Fedora 18 updates-testing report

2013-11-12 Thread updates
The following Fedora 18 Security updates need testing: Age URL 207 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-6117/eucalyptus-3.2.2-1.fc18 53 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-17195/spice-gtk-0.18-3.fc18 50 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-

Re: dnf vs yum groups information

2013-11-12 Thread Rahul Sundaram
HI On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 6:17 PM, nonamedotc wrote: > If that's true - it might be a tad inconvenient? > File a bug report against dnf noting the difference and you will get an authoritative answer as to whether it is a bug or a intended design Rahul -- test mailing list test@lists.fedorapr

Re: Fedora 19 and 20 problems

2013-11-12 Thread Adam Williamson
On Tue, 2013-11-12 at 19:59 -0600, w clemmons wrote: > Hello Fedora-qa > > > First issue: > Lenovo SL510 returns from suspend extremely loud beep both in Fedora > 19 and 20. CentOS 6.4 on the same laptop does not have extremely loud > beep when returning from suspend. > > > Second issue: > > F

Re: dnf vs yum groups information

2013-11-12 Thread nonamedotc
On 11/12/2013 04:30 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote: nonamedotc (nonamed...@fedoraproject.org) said: dnf and yum are showing different information for the command {dnf/yum} groups list. Particularly, not all the DE/WM seem to be listed in dnf output but it is listed in yum. I am just wondering if thi

Re: dnf vs yum groups information

2013-11-12 Thread Bill Nottingham
nonamedotc (nonamed...@fedoraproject.org) said: > dnf and yum are showing different information for the command > {dnf/yum} groups list. > > Particularly, not all the DE/WM seem to be listed in dnf output but > it is listed in yum. I am just wondering if this is a bug or if it's > intentional. I

dnf vs yum groups information

2013-11-12 Thread nonamedotc
dnf and yum are showing different information for the command {dnf/yum} groups list. Particularly, not all the DE/WM seem to be listed in dnf output but it is listed in yum. I am just wondering if this is a bug or if it's intentional. I would much appreciate it if someone can point me to rele

[Test-Announce] 2013-11-13 @ **17:00 UTC** - F20 Final Blocker Bug Review #1

2013-11-12 Thread Mike Ruckman
# F20 Final Blocker Review meeting #1 # Date: 2013-11-13 # Time: 17:00 UTC (12:00 EST, 09:00 PST) # Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net It's time for the first Fedora 20 Final Blocker Review meeting! We'll be running through the final blockers and freeze exception bugs. To date we

[Test-Announce] Announcing the release of Fedora 20 Beta!

2013-11-12 Thread Dennis Gilmore
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 The Fedora 20 "Heisenbug" beta release has arrived with a preview of the latest fantastic, free, and open source technology currently under development. Take a peek inside: *** What is the Beta Release? *** The beta release is the last important mile

F-20 Branched report: 20131112 changes

2013-11-12 Thread Fedora Branched Report
Compose started at Tue Nov 12 09:15:02 UTC 2013 Broken deps for armhfp -- [avro] avro-mapred-1.7.5-1.fc20.noarch requires hadoop-mapreduce avro-mapred-1.7.5-1.fc20.noarch requires hadoop-client avro-thrift-1.7.5-1.fc20