Using for HTTP install started with Grub Legacy:
https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/20-Beta-RC5/Fedora/i386/os/LiveOS/squashfs.img
06 Nov
https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/20-Beta-RC5/Fedora/i386/os/isolinux/vmlinuz
21 Oct
https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/20-Beta-RC5/F
The following Fedora 18 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
201
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-6117/eucalyptus-3.2.2-1.fc18
47
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-17195/spice-gtk-0.18-3.fc18
44
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
hi all,
Beta RC5 images have been uploaded to EC2 and are available at
ami-8b4219e2 : us-east-1 image for i386
ami-2f421946 : us-east-1 image for x86_64
additionally if your looking to the AMI's they have been added to files
in the release tree
htt
NOTE: The 32- and 64-bit Security Spins are over their respective size
targets.
As per the Fedora 20 schedule [1], Fedora 20 Beta Release Candidate 5
(RC5) is now available for testing. Content information, including
changes, can be found at
https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5787#comment:29
On Wed, 2013-11-06 at 21:54 -0300, Ricardo Varas Santana wrote:
> Thanks a lot everyone!
>
> I've already got an account for RH bugzilla, and checked test days. It
> seems like I am a too late for this release as most of the testing has
> been done already.
We still have some test days coming up,
Thanks a lot everyone!
I've already got an account for RH bugzilla, and checked test days. It
seems like I am a too late for this release as most of the testing has been
done already.
Anyway, I will report any important issues I find, and check if I can help
with a few F20 bugs.
Bests
On Mon,
On Nov 6, 2013, at 12:07 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> On Nov 6, 2013, at 12:34 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
>
>> Anyone else see this?
>>
>> the last two kernels, I have updated with yum update
>> put the following into /boot/grub2/grub.cfg
>>
>> linux/vmlinuz-kernel-3.11.7-300.fc20.x86_6
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 12:40 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-11-06 at 12:39 -0800, Richard Vickery wrote:
> > Hi Gang:
> >
> >
> > I've got this "dnf-o.4.6-1...fc20" has occurred: is it worth making a
> > bug report, or is this something that I ought to ignore?
>
> You mean, an abrt cras
On Wed, 2013-11-06 at 12:39 -0800, Richard Vickery wrote:
> Hi Gang:
>
>
> I've got this "dnf-o.4.6-1...fc20" has occurred: is it worth making a
> bug report, or is this something that I ought to ignore?
You mean, an abrt crash notification? It's usually a good idea to report
those, yes.
--
Ad
Hi Gang:
I've got this "dnf-o.4.6-1...fc20" has occurred: is it worth making a bug
report, or is this something that I ought to ignore?
Richard
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Hey, folks. So here's a Beta status update: Beta RC4 was *almost* a go,
but we have one blocker in it. I have just filed the request for Beta
RC5, which should resolve that single blocker
( https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1026466 ).
Please, when RC5 lands, help out with testing if you
On Wed, 6 Nov 2013 19:23:40 + (UTC)
Andre Robatino wrote:
> Adam Williamson redhat.com> writes:
>
> > On Sat, 2013-11-02 at 14:52 +, Andre Robatino wrote:
> > > Do we or should we have a policy of automatically promoting
> > > unfixed freeze exceptions from Alpha to Beta, or Beta to Fi
I have noticed that emacs w3m does not work in F20 alpha. Emacs version
is 24.3.1, emacs-w3m-el 1.4.435 and w3m 0.5.3.
I found a post regarding this (Debian?)
http://emacs-w3m.namazu.org/ml/msg11934.html
which indicates the issue is likely related to the versions.
"Upgrading emacs-w3m to 1.4.483
On Wed, 2013-11-06 at 19:23 +, Andre Robatino wrote:
> Adam Williamson redhat.com> writes:
>
> > On Sat, 2013-11-02 at 14:52 +, Andre Robatino wrote:
> > > Do we or should we have a policy of automatically promoting unfixed freeze
> > > exceptions from Alpha to Beta, or Beta to Final? Th
On Nov 6, 2013, at 12:23 PM, Andre Robatino wrote:
> Adam Williamson redhat.com> writes:
>
>> On Sat, 2013-11-02 at 14:52 +, Andre Robatino wrote:
>>> Do we or should we have a policy of automatically promoting unfixed freeze
>>> exceptions from Alpha to Beta, or Beta to Final? The concept
Adam Williamson redhat.com> writes:
> On Sat, 2013-11-02 at 14:52 +, Andre Robatino wrote:
> > Do we or should we have a policy of automatically promoting unfixed freeze
> > exceptions from Alpha to Beta, or Beta to Final? The concept doesn't make
> > sense for blockers, since those have to
On Nov 6, 2013, at 12:34 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
> Anyone else see this?
>
> the last two kernels, I have updated with yum update
> put the following into /boot/grub2/grub.cfg
>
> linux /vmlinuz-kernel-3.11.7-300.fc20.x86_64
> root=/dev/mapper/luks-alphanumericbit
>
> Has to be fixed before r
#fedora-blocker-review: f20beta-blocker-review-7
Minutes:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2013-11-06/f20-blocker-review.2013-11-06-17.00.html
Minutes (text):
http://meetbot.fedo
BTW, the behavior of RC3 and RC4 is not *exactly* the same - for example, in
text install for i386 RC3 vs. RC4, the positions of the root and user spokes
are different - this is an example of
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=929177 .
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Adam Williamson redhat.com> writes:
>
> On Wed, 2013-11-06 at 03:23 +, Andre Robatino wrote:
> > The install images for 20 Beta RC3 and RC4 are definitely NOT identical. The
> > checksums are different, and just looking at the DVD, the options under
> > "Installation source" are different (R
On Tue, 2013-11-05 at 23:33 +0100, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
> Is it intentional that there is no mount point suggestion in manual
> partitioning in Anaconda? I can only see plain text filed where I should
> enter desired partition mount point manually. It's not a problem but I'm
> worried that I
# F20 Beta Blocker Review meeting #6
# Date: 2013-11-06
# Time: 17:00 UTC (12:00 EST, 09:00 PST)
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net
It's time for another round of F20 beta blocker bug review! Please note
the time change to 17:00 UTC due to the recent change in standard time
for
Compose started at Wed Nov 6 08:15:02 UTC 2013
Broken deps for i386
--
[OpenEXR_CTL]
OpenEXR_CTL-1.0.1-16.fc20.i686 requires libImath.so.6
OpenEXR_CTL-1.0.1-16.fc20.i686 requires libIlmThread.so.6
OpenEXR_CTL-1.0.1-16
#420: Power management testday
---+---
Reporter: jskarvad | Owner:
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 20
Component: Test Day |Version:
Resolution:| Keywords:
Blocked By:
Compose started at Wed Nov 6 09:15:02 UTC 2013
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[blueman]
blueman-1.23-7.fc20.armv7hl requires obex-data-server >= 0:0.4.3
blueman-1.23-7.fc20.armv7hl requires gvfs-obexftp
[bwm-ng]
bwm-ng-0.6
25 matches
Mail list logo
