[Test-Announce] 2013-10-23 @ 16:00 UTC - F20 Beta Blocker Bug Review #5

# F20 Beta Blocker Review meeting #5 # Date: 2013-10-23 # Time: 16:00 UTC (12:00 EDT, 09:00 PDT) # Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net It's time for some more blocker review fun tomorrow, folks. Scheduled to be the last one before Beta, but it's not looking that way :( We'll be r

Fedora 18 updates-testing report

The following Fedora 18 Security updates need testing: Age URL 186 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-6117/eucalyptus-3.2.2-1.fc18 32 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-17195/spice-gtk-0.18-3.fc18 29 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-

Fedora 19 updates-testing report

The following Fedora 19 Security updates need testing: Age URL 69 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-14814/python-glanceclient-0.9.0-3.fc19 34 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-17121/vino-3.8.1-3.fc19 25 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA

Re: conditional blocker language

On Oct 22, 2013, at 1:33 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Tue, 2013-10-22 at 11:23 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Blocker_Bug_FAQ >> >> Existing: When a bug causes a criterion not to be met in some but not all >> cases, the teams involved in the release process wil

Re: conditional blocker language

On 10/22/2013 07:33 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: On Tue, 2013-10-22 at 11:23 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Blocker_Bug_FAQ Existing: When a bug causes a criterion not to be met in some but not all cases, the teams involved in the release process will make a judgement

Re: conditional blocker language

On Tue, 2013-10-22 at 11:23 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Blocker_Bug_FAQ > > Existing: When a bug causes a criterion not to be met in some but not all > cases, the teams involved in the release process will make a judgement as to > whether the impact of the bug is

conditional blocker language

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Blocker_Bug_FAQ Existing: When a bug causes a criterion not to be met in some but not all cases, the teams involved in the release process will make a judgement as to whether the impact of the bug is severe enough to consider the release as a whole not to meet the

Re: gtk3 broken/missing icons on kde

Rex Dieter wrote: > Matthias Clasen wrote: > >> On Sat, 2013-10-19 at 14:01 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote: >>> Adam Williamson wrote: >>> >>> > Hi folks, and welcome to the Fedora 20 Beta blocker bug news... >>> >>> can't find any criteria currently that covers application icons (though >>> do mentio

F-20 Branched report: 20131022 changes

Compose started at Tue Oct 22 09:15:02 UTC 2013 Broken deps for armhfp -- [blueman] blueman-1.23-7.fc20.armv7hl requires obex-data-server >= 0:0.4.3 blueman-1.23-7.fc20.armv7hl requires gvfs-obexftp [bwm-ng] bwm-ng-0.6

Re: [Fedora QA] #429: temporary membership in sysadmin-qa for atodorov so that beaker trial can continue

#429: temporary membership in sysadmin-qa for atodorov so that beaker trial can continue --+ Reporter: tflink | Owner: tflink Type: task | Status: new Priority: minor| Milestone: Component: permissions |

Re: [Fedora QA] #429: temporary membership in sysadmin-qa for atodorov so that beaker trial can continue

#429: temporary membership in sysadmin-qa for atodorov so that beaker trial can continue --+- Reporter: tflink | Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: minor| Milestone: Component: permissions |Version:

[Fedora QA] #429: temporary membership in sysadmin-qa for atodorov so that beaker trial can continue

#429: temporary membership in sysadmin-qa for atodorov so that beaker trial can continue -+-- Reporter: tflink | Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: minor| Milestone: Component: permissions | Version: