On 10/17/13 13:53, Joachim Backes wrote:
> did anybody try to install F20-Beta-TC... in a VirtualBox-4.3 (from
> virtualbox.org) VM?
>
> My experience: The netinst iso is booted, but no progress (I don't see
> any anaconda action, the screen remains black).
>
> Going backup to VirtualBox-4.2 will i
On 10/17/13 13:53, Joachim Backes wrote:
> Hi testers,
>
> did anybody try to install F20-Beta-TC... in a VirtualBox-4.3 (from
> virtualbox.org) VM?
>
> My experience: The netinst iso is booted, but no progress (I don't see
> any anaconda action, the screen remains black).
>
> Going backup to Virtu
Hi testers,
did anybody try to install F20-Beta-TC... in a VirtualBox-4.3 (from
virtualbox.org) VM?
My experience: The netinst iso is booted, but no progress (I don't see
any anaconda action, the screen remains black).
Going backup to VirtualBox-4.2 will install fine the test f20 beta
testcandid
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 03:18:47PM -0400, Richard Ryniker wrote:
>
> I have a similar usbmuxd problem in F20 Beta TC4. After installation,
> during the first "yum update" I noticed a message about a usbmuxd
> scriptlet error.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996231
> [root@localhost
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 8:33 AM, Mike Chambers wrote:
> Tried your script but got an exit code, ugh can't remember it now.
That was my fault, sorry. The quoting was screwed up and an escape
character was transposed. (I blame Monday. :-p)
The correct line should be:
ExecStart=/bin/bash -c "un
On Oct 16, 2013, at 9:02 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 10/16/2013 08:12 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>> Is a 64bit host expected to support running a 32bit guest OS in qemu/kvm? Or
>> do archs need to match?
>
> 64-bit guets on 64-bit host exposing a 64-bit environment - works just
> fine; supported,
On Wed, 2013-10-16 at 15:35 -0400, Richard Ryniker wrote:
> I installed F20 Beta TC4 (KDE) on a Samsung Book 9 plus with no serious
> difficulty, but touchpad operation is sometimes erratic and I see this in
> syslog:
Well, yeah, that looks like a bug. To be reported against the kernel.
Reporting
I installed F20 Beta TC4 (KDE) on a Samsung Book 9 plus with no serious
difficulty, but touchpad operation is sometimes erratic and I see this in
syslog:
Oct 16 02:47:18 localhost kernel: [3.407835] usb 2-7: unable to read config
index 0 descriptor/start: -71
Oct 16 02:47:18 localhost kernel:
On Wed, 2013-10-16 at 15:18 -0400, Richard Ryniker wrote:
> The usbmuxd problems reported by yum in your post are likely unrelated to
> the lsb issue.
>
> I have a similar usbmuxd problem in F20 Beta TC4. After installation,
> during the first "yum update" I noticed a message about a usbmuxd
> sc
The usbmuxd problems reported by yum in your post are likely unrelated to
the lsb issue.
I have a similar usbmuxd problem in F20 Beta TC4. After installation,
during the first "yum update" I noticed a message about a usbmuxd
scriptlet error. This message vanished among messages from hundreds of
Sorry, a keyboarding mistake.
On 10/16/2013 11:15 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2013-10-16 at 09:19 -0700, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote:
... and they broke the cookies open to get at the stuffing:
Chuck, this isn't a random off-topic discussion list. There are more
appropriate forums for t
On Wed, 2013-10-16 at 09:19 -0700, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote:
> ... and they broke the cookies open to get at the stuffing:
Chuck, this isn't a random off-topic discussion list. There are more
appropriate forums for that. Thanks.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitte
On Wed, 2013-10-16 at 15:39 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 10/16/2013 03:08 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > clone-of-a-private-RHEL-bug thing.
>
> Which is the problem RHEL bugs should not be cloned to to Fedora but the
> other way around since we are upstream for RHEL.
Um. That doesn
On 10/16/2013 09:51 AM, Mike Chambers wrote:
Did an F20 install with KDE. When I went to System Settings to set auto
login like I always do, it was missing.
So I discovered ssdm was the display manager, and kdm not even
installed. So I installed KDM, configured auto-login as usual, it still
wo
... and they broke the cookies open to get at the stuffing:
http://www.foxnews.com/health/2013/10/15/college-study-finds-oreo-cookies-are-as-addictive-as-drugs/?intcmp=features
--
Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX c...@omen.com www.omen.com
Developer of Industrial ZMODEM(Tm) for Embedded Applicatio
- Original Message -
> Did an F20 install with KDE. When I went to System Settings to set auto
> login like I always do, it was missing.
>
> So I discovered ssdm was the display manager, and kdm not even
> installed. So I installed KDM, configured auto-login as usual, it still
> wouldn't
Did an F20 install with KDE. When I went to System Settings to set auto
login like I always do, it was missing.
So I discovered ssdm was the display manager, and kdm not even
installed. So I installed KDM, configured auto-login as usual, it still
wouldn't do auto-login. I discovered I had to ch
On 10/16/2013 03:08 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
clone-of-a-private-RHEL-bug thing.
Which is the problem RHEL bugs should not be cloned to to Fedora but the
other way around since we are upstream for RHEL.
JBG
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fed
On Wed, 2013-10-16 at 12:50 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 10/16/2013 11:59 AM, Richard Ryniker wrote:
> > Unnecessary "private" designation for a bug report might be due to
> >
> >https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1011916
> >
> > which complains that a bug reporter has to
On Wed, 2013-10-16 at 12:41 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 10/16/2013 02:14 AM, Andre Robatino wrote:
> > dlehman proposedhttps://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1019500 as a
> > Beta Blocker, andhttps://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1019502 as a
> > Final Blocker, but both
Eric Blake wrote:
No support for running a 64-bit guest on a 32-bit host (hardware just
doesn't expose enough memory).
Your competitors software supports this configuration as long as virtualization
extensions are available on the host CPU.
Not that I'm requesting it, but a little FYI for Ch
On 10/16/2013 08:12 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> Is a 64bit host expected to support running a 32bit guest OS in qemu/kvm? Or
> do archs need to match?
64-bit guets on 64-bit host exposing a 64-bit environment - works just
fine; supported, uses hardware acceleration.
32-bit guest on 64-bit host exp
Dne středa, 16. října 2013 16:12:21 CEST, Chris Murphy napsal(a):
Is a 64bit host expected to support running a 32bit guest OS in
qemu/kvm? Or do archs need to match?
I believe, if the CPU does support that (are we talking aboout x86_64?), KVM
won't stand in the way
anyways, you can always u
Is a 64bit host expected to support running a 32bit guest OS in qemu/kvm? Or do
archs need to match?
Chris Murphy
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
On 10/16/2013 11:59 AM, Richard Ryniker wrote:
Unnecessary "private" designation for a bug report might be due to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1011916
which complains that a bug reporter has to decide about "private" status
before possibly sensitive information in the report c
Last Thursday was Gnome Test Day [1]. Thanks to all of you
who attended, whether you tested Gnome, helped people on
IRC or helped us with Test Day management. I want to
thank namely to Alexander Todorov, who helped us with
management and to Matthias Claasen for being on IRC for
people to help.
Tog
On 10/16/2013 02:14 AM, Andre Robatino wrote:
dlehman proposedhttps://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1019500 as a
Beta Blocker, andhttps://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1019502 as a
Final Blocker, but both are private, so they need to be fixed before the
meeting.
Great yet another
Compose started at Wed Oct 16 09:15:03 UTC 2013
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[blueman]
blueman-1.23-7.fc20.armv7hl requires obex-data-server >= 0:0.4.3
blueman-1.23-7.fc20.armv7hl requires gvfs-obexftp
[bwm-ng]
bwm-ng-0.6
Unnecessary "private" designation for a bug report might be due to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1011916
which complains that a bug reporter has to decide about "private" status
before possibly sensitive information in the report can be examined.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.f
29 matches
Mail list logo
