The following Fedora 17 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
370
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-10269/revelation-0.4.14-1.fc17
182
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-0455/fedora-business-cards-1-0.1.beta1.fc17
110
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/up
The following Fedora 18 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
183
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-0416/fedora-business-cards-1-0.1.beta1.fc18
117
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-3935/puppet-3.1.1-1.fc18
110
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/
On Wed, 2013-07-03 at 16:47 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Hi folks! Taking into account the feedback on the first draft of the
> revised criteria, I've updated the draft page with a few changes:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Adamwill/Draft_final_criteria_sandbox
(snip)
> I'd also li
On Jul 9, 2013 11:40 PM, "John Morris" wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2013-07-09 at 20:34 -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
> > This email was not helpful nor being excellent to each other. It also
shows
> > a biased view that shows that the user didn't even try the version that
> > shipped in at least alp
On Wed, 10 Jul 2013, John Morris wrote:
On Wed, 2013-07-10 at 14:09 +0200, Karel Volný wrote:
Dne středa, 10. července 2013 5:13:22 CEST, John Morris napsal(a):
...
But then I remembered that if things have really went wrong you could boot
with init=/usr/bin/bash.
how do these advices help
On Wed, 10 Jul 2013, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
On 07/10/2013 12:32 PM, Karel Volný wrote:
Dne úterý, 9. července 2013 16:57:22 CEST, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
napsal(a):
No need too, Bill will just close this WONTFIX and reach through the
screen and smack you on the back of your head or Vác
On Wed, 2013-07-10 at 14:09 +0200, Karel Volný wrote:
> Dne středa, 10. července 2013 5:13:22 CEST, John Morris napsal(a):
> ...
> > But then I remembered that if things have really went wrong you could boot
> > with init=/usr/bin/bash.
>
> how do these advices help when the system is already so
On Wed, 2013-07-10 at 11:50 -0500, Kevin Martin wrote:
> Or maybe this from the not-reportable file (a message, by the way, that makes
> no sense at the point where it says "free and Nouveau
> driver"):
>
> Your problem seems to be caused by NVIDIA graphics driver
>
> The NVIDIA graphics driver
On Wed, 2013-07-10 at 11:36 -0500, John Morris wrote:
> > Works fine here. What you're describing does not sound like the normal
> > lock screen at all, to me. The lock screen has the user name and a
> > password text entry box beneath it. Anything you type shows up in that
> > box.
>
> Boot up
> Works fine here. What you're describing does not sound like the normal
> lock screen at all, to me. The lock screen has the user name and a
> password text entry box beneath it. Anything you type shows up in that
> box.
Boot up, push the mouse away from the center of the screen and wait.
Onc
On 2013-07-10 7:18, Kevin Martin wrote:
On 07/09/13 23:03, Ankur Sinha wrote:
On Tue, 2013-07-09 at 21:17 -0500, Kevin Martin wrote:
So how should I report this? Is there some way to force ABRT to
report this?
Chrome? I thought ABRT only reports issues for Fedora packages? You
may
be able
#389: Proposed Test Day - AD trusts with POSIX attributes in AD and support for
old clients
---+---
Reporter: dpal | Owner: adamwill
Type: task | Status: assigned
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 19
Component: Test
On 07/09/13 23:03, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-07-09 at 21:17 -0500, Kevin Martin wrote:
>> So how should I report this? Is there some way to force ABRT to
>> report this?
>
> Chrome? I thought ABRT only reports issues for Fedora packages? You may
> be able to save the ABRT log and manually
Thanks anyone involved. You can see the write-up here:
https://kparal.wordpress.com/2013/07/10/the-heroes-of-fedora-updates-testing-in-q2-2013/
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
On 07/10/2013 12:32 PM, Karel Volný wrote:
Dne úterý, 9. července 2013 16:57:22 CEST, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
napsal(a):
No need too, Bill will just close this WONTFIX and reach through the
screen and smack you on the back of your head or Václav will just
find you with something to throw at yo
Dne úterý, 9. července 2013 16:57:22 CEST, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" napsal(a):
No need too, Bill will just close this WONTFIX and reach
through the screen and smack you on the back of your head or
Václav will just find you with something to throw at you, either
way you need to find a helmet and
Thanks to all for their opinion.
Now the last question: Could init sent on ctr-alt-del at least TERM and
KILL to all processes in case, everything else failed ?
Could systemd do that?
My answers are YES and NO, but I may be wrong.
For systemd I saw (after power interruption) in the log this:
Dne středa, 10. července 2013 5:13:22 CEST, John Morris napsal(a):
If you want sysrq and understand the implications you can enable it
...
But then I remembered that if things have really went wrong you could boot
with init=/usr/bin/bash.
how do these advices help when the system is already
Have glanced at:
http://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/man/systemd-cryptsetup-generator.html
I have a keyfile for all luks, excluding /root which is passphrase.
keyfiles is stored in /root
The /root is the only luks-foo listed in /etc/grub2.cfg
Has worked up to recently.
How can I force sy
On 2013-07-09 23:40, John Morris wrote:
On Tue, 2013-07-09 at 20:34 -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
This email was not helpful nor being excellent to each other. It also
shows
a biased view that shows that the user didn't even try the version
that
shipped in at least alpha onward which does
20 matches
Mail list logo
