Re: user list

2013-07-06 Thread Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
On 07/07/2013 03:32 AM, Scott Robbins wrote: One reason people complain is because RedHat has at times, blithely put in Fedora-isms, which are often aimed more at the single user laptop, into their RHEL releases, where some things can be inappropriate. Fedora is not limited to single users syst

Re: user list

2013-07-06 Thread Scott Robbins
On Sat, Jul 06, 2013 at 07:21:52PM -0700, Richard Vickery wrote: > On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 6:08 PM, David wrote: > > On 7/6/2013 9:02 PM, Richard Vickery wrote: > >> of users to get into the system has been replaced by a bar. It's > >> replacement is not so necessary for those of us who are famili

Re: user list

2013-07-06 Thread Richard Vickery
On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 6:08 PM, David wrote: > On 7/6/2013 9:02 PM, Richard Vickery wrote: >> A nit-picking issue, (forgive me for my lack of tech-speak): I just >> updated to "Linux 3.9.9-301.fc19.x86_64" and found that the nice list >> of users to get into the system has been replaced by a bar.

Re: Fedora 17 updates-testing report

2013-07-06 Thread Michael Cronenworth
On 07/06/2013 08:41 PM, upda...@fedoraproject.org wrote: The following Fedora 17 Security updates need testing: Age URL 366https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-10269/revelation-0.4.14-1.fc17 178https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-0455/fedora-business-cards-

Fedora 17 updates-testing report

2013-07-06 Thread updates
The following Fedora 17 Security updates need testing: Age URL 366 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-10269/revelation-0.4.14-1.fc17 178 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-0455/fedora-business-cards-1-0.1.beta1.fc17 106 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/up

Re: user list

2013-07-06 Thread David
On 7/6/2013 9:02 PM, Richard Vickery wrote: > A nit-picking issue, (forgive me for my lack of tech-speak): I just > updated to "Linux 3.9.9-301.fc19.x86_64" and found that the nice list > of users to get into the system has been replaced by a bar. It's > replacement is not so necessary for those of

user list

2013-07-06 Thread Richard Vickery
A nit-picking issue, (forgive me for my lack of tech-speak): I just updated to "Linux 3.9.9-301.fc19.x86_64" and found that the nice list of users to get into the system has been replaced by a bar. It's replacement is not so necessary for those of us who are familiar with Linux, especially if we bo

Re: [Fedora-spins] Proposal: Spins process amendment for Fedora 20 cycle

2013-07-06 Thread Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
On 07/06/2013 05:01 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: People creating spins should be allowed to create sub community surrounding their spins and will not be able to do that with those insane requirements. If they have a "sub community" shouldn't that mean there's at least one other person in it that c

Re: [Fedora-spins] Proposal: Spins process amendment for Fedora 20 cycle

2013-07-06 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, 05 Jul 2013 20:44:32 + "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > On 07/05/2013 05:03 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > Greetings. > > > > I'd like to propose some changes to the spins process for F20. > > I'm sending this just to the spins and test lists first, to try and > > hash out things, then we

Re: [Fedora-spins] Proposal: Spins process amendment for Fedora 20 cycle

2013-07-06 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, 05 Jul 2013 13:18:49 -0700 Adam Williamson wrote: ...snip... > We already have test cases for all of these. No need for new ones. ok. How can we denote the ones we desire tested for these? Basic Desktop? > > At the Alpha milestone, all approved spins will be created by > > rel-eng.

rawhide report: 20130706 changes

2013-07-06 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
Compose started at Sat Jul 6 08:15:02 UTC 2013 Broken deps for x86_64 -- [avgtime] avgtime-0-0.6.git20130201.fc20.x86_64 requires libphobos-ldc.so.60()(64bit) [derelict] derelict-tcod-3-20.20130626gite70c293.fc20.i686 requir