As per the Fedora 19 schedule [1], Fedora 19 Final Release Candidate 1
(RC1) is now available for testing. Content information, including
changes, can be found at
https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5623#comment:18 . Please see the
following pages for download links (including delta ISOs) and t
The following Fedora 18 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
167
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-0416/fedora-business-cards-1-0.1.beta1.fc18
101
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-3935/puppet-3.1.1-1.fc18
94
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/
The following Fedora 17 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
354
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-10269/revelation-0.4.14-1.fc17
166
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-0455/fedora-business-cards-1-0.1.beta1.fc17
94
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/up
On Sun, 2013-06-23 at 23:54 +1200, Gavin Flower wrote:
> On 23/06/13 23:47, Christian Menzel wrote:
>
> > Hi, I upgraded to F19 from F18 via fedup and noticed that powertop
> > is not working anymore. It repeats constantly the following 2
> > messages:
> >
> >
> > BUG: requesting unregistered p
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 7:28 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Honestly, I don't quite get why anyone would run a
> 32-bit guest, unless you're somehow still stuck with a 32-bit only host
> machine
>
performance?
http://superuser.com/questions/407072/why-do-some-applications-run-faster-on-a-32-bit-gue
On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 10:33:10PM -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Fred Smith wrote:
>
> > While trying to work thru problem with my netbook not going to sleep
> > when the lid is closed (in relation to some of the bugs discussed on
> > this last in the last several days) I had cause to do a yum update
On Mon, 2013-06-24 at 19:31 -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> >On Mon, 2013-06-24 at 15:21 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote:
> >
> >> QA:Testcase_Boot_Methods_Xen_Para_Virt
> >
> >Konrad, are you able to give F19 Final TC6 or later (RC1 may be built
> >today) a shot and che
On Mon, 2013-06-24 at 18:57 -0400, Fernando Cassia wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 1:34 AM, Adam Williamson
> wrote:
> > I wonder if anyone else has tested F19 (32bit) on Virtualbox
> guest
>
>
> Yes, several people.
>
> Hi Adam,
>
> Apparently not w
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 1:34 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > I wonder if anyone else has tested F19 (32bit) on Virtualbox guest
>
> Yes, several people.
Hi Adam,
Apparently not with the guest additions installed. There is a bug, that
affects the X server only in the 32bit Fedora. It's been repor
On Mon, 2013-06-24 at 15:21 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote:
> QA:Testcase_install_repository_NFS_variation
> QA:Testcase_install_repository_HTTP/FTP_graphical
> QA:Testcase_install_repository_NFS_graphical
I will at least get to these today, and try and hit up the ks/updates
path ones too.
--
Adam Wil
On Mon, 2013-06-24 at 15:21 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote:
> QA:Testcase_Boot_Methods_Xen_Para_Virt
Konrad, are you able to give F19 Final TC6 or later (RC1 may be built
today) a shot and check Xen is OK? Dennis, does any of your testing hit
this test case?
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monk
On Mon, 2013-06-24 at 07:22 -0400, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> > that is, with the old spin-kickstarts and without the above update,
> > we're 19215872 bytes oversize; with the update but old spin-kickstarts,
> > we're 17118720 bytes oversize (the update saves ~2.1MB); and with the
> > update and lat
On Mon, 2013-06-24 at 15:21 +0200, drago01 wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 3:15 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > Bruno Wolff III (br...@wolff.to) said:
> >> On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 18:04:55 -0400,
> >> Matthias Clasen wrote:
> >> >rpm db 82M
> >>
> >> I vaguely remember a discussion abo
=
#fedora-blocker-review: f19final-blocker-review-8
=
Minutes:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2013-06-24/f19final-blocker-review-8.2013-06-24-16.00.html
Minutes (text):
http://
Josef improved the script a bit, you can see the as-of-now test case stats here:
http://kparal.fedorapeople.org/testcase_stats/Category_Installation_validation_testing.html
(sort it by "Last in")
We definitely need to execute:
QA:Testcase_install_repository_NFS_variation
QA:Testcase_Anaconda_upd
On 06/23/2013 10:04 PM, Frank McCormick wrote:
On 06/23/2013 08:18 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 03:54:33PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
bash -x grub2-mkconfig -o /boot/grub2/grub.cfg
Post the result somewhere, then post the URL here. Sounds like an OS Prober
issue, which is
On Mon, 2013-06-24 at 09:15 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Bruno Wolff III (br...@wolff.to) said:
> > On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 18:04:55 -0400,
> > Matthias Clasen wrote:
> > >rpm db 82M
> >
> > I vaguely remember a discussion about dropping this for live images
> > because it gets reb
On Mon, 2013-06-24 at 09:14 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > - We have both js and mozjs17. js is still used by gjs, libpeas,
> > libproxy-mozjs and gnome-shell. Possible savings: 7M
>
> I thought Colin was fixing everything to use mosjz17. Is that a F-20
> thing?
It missed f19, yes.
--
test m
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 3:15 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Bruno Wolff III (br...@wolff.to) said:
>> On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 18:04:55 -0400,
>> Matthias Clasen wrote:
>> >rpm db 82M
>>
>> I vaguely remember a discussion about dropping this for live images
>> because it gets rebuilt ever
Bruno Wolff III (br...@wolff.to) said:
> On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 18:04:55 -0400,
> Matthias Clasen wrote:
> >rpm db 82M
>
> I vaguely remember a discussion about dropping this for live images
> because it gets rebuilt every boot when needed. My memory is that we
> ended up removing th
> - We have both js and mozjs17. js is still used by gjs, libpeas,
> libproxy-mozjs and gnome-shell. Possible savings: 7M
I thought Colin was fixing everything to use mosjz17. Is that a F-20
thing?
Bill
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject
Compose started at Mon Jun 24 09:15:02 UTC 2013
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[avgtime]
avgtime-0-0.5.git20120724.fc19.x86_64 requires
libphobos-ldc.so.60()(64bit)
[derelict]
derelict-ogg-3-13.20130516gitd8aa11d.fc19.i686 require
Join us on irc.freenode.net in #fedora-meeting-2 for this important
meeting, wherein we shall determine the readiness of the Fedora 19.
Thursday, June 27, 2013 17:00 UTC (1 PM EDT, 10 AM PDT, 19:00 CEST)
"Before each public release Development, QA and Release Engineering meet
to determine if the
Compose started at Mon Jun 24 08:15:03 UTC 2013
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[aries-blueprint]
aries-blueprint-0.3.1-5.fc19.noarch requires asm2
[chmsee]
chmsee-2.0-5.git0acc572a.fc20.x86_64 requires libxpcom.so()(64bit)
[cxf]
- Original Message -
> - Original Message -
> > On Sat, 2013-06-22 at 22:17 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2013-06-22 at 11:00 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 2013-06-21 at 14:14 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > https://bugzilla.
- Original Message -
> On Sat, 2013-06-22 at 22:17 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Sat, 2013-06-22 at 11:00 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2013-06-21 at 14:14 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=958426 - "19 Fin
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 11:41 AM, Pedro Francisco
wrote:
> Gnome's MTP support is not working with my Galaxy Nexus. PTP does work.
Seems to work fine here with my Nexus 4
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Gnome's MTP support is not working with my Galaxy Nexus. PTP does work.
MTP mode ---
usb 2-2: new high-speed USB device number 4 using ehci-pci
usb 2-2: New USB device found, idVendor=04e8, idProduct=685c
usb 2-2: New USB device strings: Mfr=2, Product=3, SerialNumber=4
usb 2-2: Product: Gala
28 matches
Mail list logo
