The following Fedora 17 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
342
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-10269/revelation-0.4.14-1.fc17
154
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-0455/fedora-business-cards-1-0.1.beta1.fc17
82
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/up
The following Fedora 18 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
155
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-0416/fedora-business-cards-1-0.1.beta1.fc18
89
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-3935/puppet-3.1.1-1.fc18
82
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/
On Wed, 2013-06-12 at 18:46 -0400, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Jun 12, 2013, at 4:24 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
> wrote:
>
> > On 06/12/2013 02:38 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> >>>
> >> I can kinda see Johann's point, which is that - since most dual boot
> >> installs will require a resize - if we
On Tue, 2013-06-11 at 19:00 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> Desktop team...I know you have this thing about not reading RH
> bugs...but it really does mean you miss out on what looks like some
> valuable information. Can't it be re-considered? Couldn't you at least
> task someone to take a swee
On Jun 12, 2013, at 4:24 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 06/12/2013 02:38 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>>>
>> I can kinda see Johann's point, which is that - since most dual boot
>> installs will require a resize - if we don't 'support' resize, we're
>> really not 'supporting' dual boot i
On 06/12/2013 02:38 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2013-06-11 at 19:17 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 06/11/2013 12:37 AM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
Installing to a freespace should be uncontroversial indeed it's the
resize I was referring to and as afaik when you buy a set of hardware
w
On Wed, 2013-06-12 at 12:20 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Jun 2013 09:09:02 -0700
> Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> > > Actually, just calling it "Next" instead of "Done" would help a lot
> > > to provide some hope that you might eventually get to select partitions
> > > :-).
> >
> > Like
On Wed, 12 Jun 2013 09:09:02 -0700
Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Actually, just calling it "Next" instead of "Done" would help a lot
> > to provide some hope that you might eventually get to select partitions
> > :-).
>
> Like I said, that's exactly what it was labeled before, and people
> didn't
On Wed, 2013-06-12 at 06:19 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 19:25:29 -0700
> Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> > It is very useful if you want to be absolutely sure that a given disk
> > will not be used at all
>
> But a option in the tree view to say "Protect this disk from any
> change
2013-06-12 15:07, Kalev Lember skrev:
> 2013-06-12 13:18, Lawrence Graves skrev:
>> I installed Fedora 19 TC2 and after update it failed to display .
>
> Likely https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=973542
... and now with a fix:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gnome-shell-3.8.3-2.f
Compose started at Wed Jun 12 09:15:02 UTC 2013
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[avgtime]
avgtime-0-0.5.git20120724.fc19.x86_64 requires
libphobos-ldc.so.60()(64bit)
[derelict]
derelict-ogg-3-13.20130516gitd8aa11d.fc19.i686 require
2013-06-12 13:18, Lawrence Graves skrev:
> I installed Fedora 19 TC2 and after update it failed to display .
Likely https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=973542
--
Kalev
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Compose started at Wed Jun 12 08:15:02 UTC 2013
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[bind10]
bind10-1.0.0-3.fc20.i686 requires liblog4cplus-1.1.so.5
bind10-1.0.0-3.fc20.x86_64 requires liblog4cplus-1.1.so.5()(64bit)
bind10-dhcp-
On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 19:25:29 -0700
Adam Williamson wrote:
> It is very useful if you want to be absolutely sure that a given disk
> will not be used at all
But a option in the tree view to say "Protect this disk from any
changes" would work as well, and also give you the opportunity
to actually i
On Thu, 2013-06-06 at 12:58 -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> >
> Please send me the te files that you created, or the original avc messages.
>
>
After the last selinux related updates all is working as expected.
No need of custom modules.
Thanks Daniel and to all of you.
Congrats for the new Fedor
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 4:00 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-06-11 at 10:22 -0400, Martin Holec wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> this is quick summary of Fedora 19 Gnome[1] Test Day.
>> Thanks to everybody who joined this event. Especially developers and QEs who
>> were available during all day on I
On 06/09/2013 09:42 PM, Richard Vickery wrote:
In the middle of updating , I got these; how important are they? and,I
supopose, is the command to recover "db_runrecovery"?
error: rpmdb: BDB0113 Thread/process 3820/139765024729088 failed:
BDB1507 Thread died in Berkeley DB library
error: db5 erro
On Wed, 2013-06-12 at 00:27 -0500, John Morris wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-06-10 at 19:09 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> > You are 'Done' picking disks, though, and there's a big chunk of text on
> > the screen saying "They will be left untouched until you click on the
> > main menu's "Begin Installa
18 matches
Mail list logo
