On Sat, 2013-06-08 at 23:06 +0200, Branko Grubic wrote:
> On Sun, 2013-06-09 at 00:16 +0400, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> > $ systemd-analyze blame
> > 29.565s chronyd.service
> > 29.468s avahi-daemon.service
> > 27.942s firewalld.service
> > 27.813s restorecond.servi
The following Fedora 18 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
151
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-0416/fedora-business-cards-1-0.1.beta1.fc18
85
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-3935/puppet-3.1.1-1.fc18
78
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/
The following Fedora 17 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
338
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-10269/revelation-0.4.14-1.fc17
150
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-0455/fedora-business-cards-1-0.1.beta1.fc17
78
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/up
>Might it be possible to defer construction of the yum database until
>Firstboot?
Just want to make it clear this is something to consider for F20. I
think it is too late to make this sort of change in F19.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedorapro
On Sat, 8 Jun 2013 13:02:31 -0400
Tom Horsley wrote:
> Finally found it: There was no /etc/sysconfig/network
> file.
And I see there is a bugzilla for this as well (which
I couldn't find till I knew what the problem was :-).
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=972353
--
test mailing lis
On Sat, 2013-06-08 at 23:06 +0200, Branko Grubic wrote:
> On Sun, 2013-06-09 at 00:16 +0400, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> > $ systemd-analyze blame
> > 29.565s chronyd.service
> > 29.468s avahi-daemon.service
> > 27.942s firewalld.service
> > 27.813s restorecond.servic
On Sun, 2013-06-09 at 00:16 +0400, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> $ systemd-analyze blame
> 29.565s chronyd.service
> 29.468s avahi-daemon.service
> 27.942s firewalld.service
> 27.813s restorecond.service
> 27.695s gdm.service
> 20.003s plymouth-quit-wa
On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 12:06:32PM +0300, Cristian Sava wrote:
> virtual environment. All needed is stock or was packaged on F19
> (rpmbuild -ta ... / rpmbuild -ba ...) and all is working fine (selinux
It took me a while to figure out you're not talking about Fedora
packages but RPMs/specfiles pro
John Reiser wrote on Sat, 08 Jun 2013 07:37:56
-0700:
>The database consists of a directory for each installed package, and
>each directory contains 8 symlinks for the attributes of that package.
>So if 1000 packages are installed then 9000 new files are created.
I can imagine a superior data ba
On Sat, 2013-06-08 at 12:32 -0400, Joerg Lechner wrote:
> Hi,
> I made a new installation, I feel that I can understand this process a
> little better after the help of John
> Thank You
John's right, but half an hour is still pretty slow. Is it an old system
you're installing on? From USB or DVD o
The following Fedora 19 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
53
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-5801/mantis-1.2.15-1.fc19
25
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-8116/clamav-0.97.8-1.fc19
14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-9102/
Greetings all,
I am a long-time Fedora-enthusiast. Long-time as in since Fedora Core
1. I've always been an early adopter of releases although I've never
officially signed up as a tester.
Switching to my Network-Manager inquiry ... I'm currently using
NM-0.9.8.2-1, kernel 3.9.4-301_x86_64
On Sat, 8 Jun 2013 10:39:09 -0400
Tom Horsley wrote:
> Anyone know what might be missing that prevents this
> stuff from working?
Finally found it: There was no /etc/sysconfig/network
file.
The ifup initscript pukes when it can't find that file.
I copied the one from fedora 18, and all my bridg
I disabled NetworkManager, I enabled network, I copied in all my
/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-* files, but I don't get
any networking on my fedora 19 install.
I've got this box connected to a dd-wrt router doing
tagged packets for vlan support, so the network setup
is a tad complex :-). Yo
Joerg Lechner wrote:
> ... on an old PC (524MB Ram, 1,6 GHz, board KVTA5, 2 disks: 20GB Fedora
> tests, 250GB Windows XP, PATA)
> ... The process installing the bootloader at the end of the installation
> process took about half an hour.
It is best to investigate using VT2. Type (where is
Fu
Compose started at Sat Jun 8 09:15:02 UTC 2013
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[deltacloud-core]
deltacloud-core-rhevm-1.1.3-1.fc19.noarch requires rubygem(rbovirt) >=
0:0.0.18
[dragonegg]
dragonegg-3.1-19.fc19.x86_64 requires gcc
Compose started at Sat Jun 8 08:15:03 UTC 2013
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[bind10]
bind10-1.0.0-3.fc20.i686 requires liblog4cplus-1.1.so.5
bind10-1.0.0-3.fc20.x86_64 requires liblog4cplus-1.1.so.5()(64bit)
bind10-dhcp-
17 matches
Mail list logo