F19 Beta karma requests (final)

2013-05-23 Thread Adam Williamson
Hey folks! We signed off on F19 Beta today, huge thanks to everyone who helped test. RC4 will be shipped as the Beta. Now we should push the updates that were included in RC4 from the side repo to stable, so we need karma on: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-8761/gdm-3.8.1.1-5.f

redhat-lsb dependency issues

2013-05-23 Thread piruthiviraj natarajan
I tried installing google-chrome but the package redhat-lsb has dependency issue. It requires a spax as dependency which is not available in fedora repos. Its available as a subpackage in star.x86_64 0:1.5.1-11.fc19 . But even after installing star manually the dependency issue persists for redhat

Re: [Fedora QA] #346: Proposed Test Day - Virtualization

2013-05-23 Thread Fedora QA
#346: Proposed Test Day - Virtualization ---+--- Reporter: crobinso | Owner: Type: task | Status: closed Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 19 Component: Test Day |Version: Resolution: fixed | Keywords: Blocke

F-19 Branched report: 20130523 changes

2013-05-23 Thread Fedora Branched Report
Compose started at Thu May 23 09:15:02 UTC 2013 Broken deps for x86_64 -- [byzanz] byzanz-0.3-0.5.fc17.x86_64 requires libpanel-applet-4.so.0()(64bit) [deltacloud-core] deltacloud-core-rhevm-1.1.3-1.fc19.noarch requires rubyge

Fedora 17 updates-testing report

2013-05-23 Thread updates
The following Fedora 17 Security updates need testing: Age URL 321 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-10269/revelation-0.4.14-1.fc17 134 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-0455/fedora-business-cards-1-0.1.beta1.fc17 62 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/up

Re: netiquette (Re: Password strength checker not for root account)

2013-05-23 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2013-05-23 at 12:44 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > Those that do not follow the official project mailing list guidelines > risk the appearance and smiting from POC and will be sentenced to 3 > weeks of java triaging ;) Nonono, they will be sentenced to clean up the texlive spec

Re: netiquette (Re: Password strength checker not for root account)

2013-05-23 Thread Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
On 05/23/2013 11:51 AM, Karel Volný wrote: Dne Čt 23. května 2013 11:51:19, Lars Seipel napsal(a): On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 07:48:23AM -0700, richard.vicker...@gmail.com wrote: [removed tons of garbage in a single gigantic line] Could we please keep to bottle-posting? This kind of forces the read

rawhide report: 20130523 changes

2013-05-23 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
Compose started at Thu May 23 08:15:03 UTC 2013 Broken deps for x86_64 -- [dragonegg] dragonegg-3.1-19.fc19.x86_64 requires gcc = 0:4.7.2-9.fc19 [ekiga] ekiga-4.0.1-1.fc19.x86_64 requires libedata-book-1.2.so.17()(64bit) [good

netiquette (Re: Password strength checker not for root account)

2013-05-23 Thread Karel Volný
Dne Čt 23. května 2013 11:51:19, Lars Seipel napsal(a): > On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 07:48:23AM -0700, richard.vicker...@gmail.com wrote: > [removed tons of garbage in a single gigantic line] > Could we please keep to bottle-posting? This kind of forces > the reader to read the entire post and get the

Re: Password strength checker not for root account

2013-05-23 Thread Lars Seipel
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 07:48:23AM -0700, richard.vicker...@gmail.com wrote: [removed tons of garbage in a single gigantic line] Could we please keep to bottle-posting? This kind of forces the reader to read the entire post and get the context  As much as I agree: you are aware that you're asking

Re: [Fedora QA] #346: Proposed Test Day - Virtualization

2013-05-23 Thread Fedora QA
#346: Proposed Test Day - Virtualization ---+--- Reporter: crobinso | Owner: Type: task | Status: closed Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 19 Component: Test Day |Version: Resolution: fixed | Keywords: Blocke

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 19 Beta Release Candidate 3 (RC3) Available Now!

2013-05-23 Thread Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
On 05/23/2013 12:57 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: On Wed, 2013-05-22 at 17:23 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 05/22/2013 01:45 PM, John Reiser wrote: On 05/22/2013 01:24 PM, drago01 wrote: Which means you'd be better off with file system level compression. Yes, if you have administrator privileges