NOTE: The 64-bit Live LXDE is over its size target (700 MiB) and will
not fit on a standard 700 MiB CD.
As per the Fedora 19 schedule [1], Fedora 19 Beta Release Candidate 4
(RC4) is now available for testing. Content information, including
changes, can be found at
https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 06:13:55PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Can you elaborate on those? (Or point me to something; I tried to Google
> > but only found you saying a similar thing in a different post.)
> dgilmore could do a better job of it, but basically, the way lmc was
> initially design
On Wed, 2013-05-22 at 21:12 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 05:57:57PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > that that's going quite slowly (livemedia-creator is supposed to be the
> > brand new thing, but it had some design problems.)
>
> Can you elaborate on those? (Or point m
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 05:57:57PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> that that's going quite slowly (livemedia-creator is supposed to be the
> brand new thing, but it had some design problems.)
Can you elaborate on those? (Or point me to something; I tried to Google but
only found you saying a simil
On 05/22/2013 05:23 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 05/22/2013 01:45 PM, John Reiser wrote:
>> On 05/22/2013 01:24 PM, drago01 wrote:
>>> Which means you'd be better off with file system level compression.
>>
>> Yes, if you have administrator privileges and strategic planning,
>> and if you can tolerat
On Wed, 2013-05-22 at 17:23 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 05/22/2013 01:45 PM, John Reiser wrote:
> > On 05/22/2013 01:24 PM, drago01 wrote:
> >> Which means you'd be better off with file system level compression.
> >
> > Yes, if you have administrator privileges and strategic planning,
> > and if
On 05/22/2013 01:45 PM, John Reiser wrote:
On 05/22/2013 01:24 PM, drago01 wrote:
Which means you'd be better off with file system level compression.
Yes, if you have administrator privileges and strategic planning,
and if you can tolerate a read-only fs (or your fs can handle overwrites),
the
On 05/22/2013 01:24 PM, drago01 wrote:
> Which means you'd be better off with file system level compression.
Yes, if you have administrator privileges and strategic planning,
and if you can tolerate a read-only fs (or your fs can handle overwrites),
then compression of the filesystem itself often
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 10:12 PM, John Reiser wrote:
> On 05/22/2013 12:04 PM, Clemens Eisserer wrote:
>> As UPX requires executeables to be decompressed during startup (and
>> furthermore does not support ELF shared libraries),
>
> An executable main program which has been compressed by UPX
> *ca
On 05/22/2013 12:04 PM, Clemens Eisserer wrote:
> As UPX requires executeables to be decompressed during startup (and
> furthermore does not support ELF shared libraries),
An executable main program which has been compressed by UPX
*can* use ELF shared libraries, and nearly all programs on Linux
On Wed, 2013-05-22 at 14:23 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 12:12:17 -0700,
>Adam Williamson wrote:
> >
> >What might be a _smarter_ way to do it might be to set up some kind of
> >cleverer mechanism for making the matching kickstarts available. It
> >seems like there s
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Clemens Eisserer wrote:
> As UPX requires executeables to be decompressed during startup
have you ever used upx? the executable decompresses itself in ram when
its executed, the process is totally seamless to the end user and in
fact the executable loads FASTER t
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 12:12:17 -0700,
Adam Williamson wrote:
What might be a _smarter_ way to do it might be to set up some kind of
cleverer mechanism for making the matching kickstarts available. It
seems like there should be some way we can have them injected into the
images and put on th
On Wed, 2013-05-22 at 13:11 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 10:57:28 -0700,
>John Reiser wrote:
> >On 05/22/2013 08:30 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> >
> >> The old fedora-install-fedora.ks was used,
> >> 9d0717ccdad4151072a54d8f974367cad42c061d
> >> had to be picked up.
On Wed, 2013-05-22 at 16:22 +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:
> Same with rawhide.
>
> This is just a warning after upgrading.
>
> Prior to this no problems here.
Yeah, that's due to the image being taken out of the package to try and
save space. It's slightly ugly but shouldn't cause any critic
Hi,
> I guess the devs have heard ab UPX?
> http://rpm.pbone.net/index.php3/stat/4/idpl/20036777/dir/fedora_18/com/upx-3.08-2.fc18.x86_64.rpm.html
>
> http://upx.sourceforge.net/
As UPX requires executeables to be decompressed during startup (and
furthermore does not support ELF shared libraries)
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 1:42 AM, Andre Robatino
wrote:
> NOTE: The 64-bit Live LXDE is over its size target (700 MiB) and will
> not fit on a standard 700 MiB CD.
I guess the devs have heard ab UPX?
http://rpm.pbone.net/index.php3/stat/4/idpl/20036777/dir/fedora_18/com/upx-3.08-2.fc18.x86_64.rpm.
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 10:57:28 -0700,
John Reiser wrote:
On 05/22/2013 08:30 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
The old fedora-install-fedora.ks was used,
9d0717ccdad4151072a54d8f974367cad42c061d
had to be picked up. The missing groups are part of environments, so
these were dropped http://paste.
On 05/22/2013 08:30 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> The old fedora-install-fedora.ks was used,
> 9d0717ccdad4151072a54d8f974367cad42c061d
> had to be picked up. The missing groups are part of environments, so
> these were dropped http://paste.fedoraproject.org/13689/69226468/
It would be nice if th
#fedora-blocker-review: f19beta-blocker-review-8
Minutes:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2013-05-22/f19beta-blocker-review-8.2013-05-22-16.07.html
Minutes (text):
http://meet
- Original Message -
> On Wed, 2013-05-22 at 00:42 -0400, Andre Robatino wrote:
> > NOTE: The 64-bit Live LXDE is over its size target (700 MiB) and will
> > not fit on a standard 700 MiB CD.
> >
> > As per the Fedora 19 schedule [1], Fedora 19 Beta Release Candidate 3
> > (RC3) is now ava
See bottom... Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone.
let me hijack ... does the strenght meter still think that a correct horse
battery stapple-like password is weak?
K.
Dne Út 21. května 2013 12:43:30, Adam Williamson napsal(a):
> On Tue, 2013-05-21 at 21:41 +0200, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
> > On 21.05.2013 21:36, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > >
On Wed, 2013-05-22 at 10:27 +0200, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
>
> Thanks, I'll finally learn how to prepare my own Fedora installation
> image. It'd be more beneficial than watch "Welcome screen" again and
> again and again.
Ok, glad you solved your problem. I also just learned that you can hit
Compose started at Wed May 22 09:15:03 UTC 2013
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[byzanz]
byzanz-0.3-0.5.fc17.x86_64 requires libpanel-applet-4.so.0()(64bit)
[deltacloud-core]
deltacloud-core-rhevm-1.1.3-1.fc19.noarch requires rubyge
Compose started at Wed May 22 08:15:02 UTC 2013
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[airinv]
airinv-1.00.0-3.fc19.i686 requires libsoci_mysql.so.3.1
airinv-1.00.0-3.fc19.i686 requires libsoci_core.so.3.1
airinv-1.00.0-3.fc19.x86
On Tue, 2013-05-21 at 12:20 +0300, Cristian Sava wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-05-21 at 09:21 +0300, Cristian Sava wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > I need to have alias network interfaces.
> > What is the desired way to do this in F19?
> >
> > My actual setup (without alias):
> > [root@physics sysconfig]# ls networ
On 22.05.2013 01:21, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-05-21 at 22:54 +0200, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
>> Is it possible to disable this "feature"? It might be funny when you are
>> 10 years old, new Linux user and just gotten your first computer from
>> your parents. For all other cases it's
Same with rawhide.
This is just a warning after upgrading.
Prior to this no problems here.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
29 matches
Mail list logo
