[Test-Announce] Fedora 19 Beta Release Candidate 2 (RC2) Available Now!

NOTE: The 64-bit Live LXDE is over its size target (700 MiB) and will not fit on a standard 700 MiB CD. As per the Fedora 19 schedule [1], Fedora 19 Beta Release Candidate 2 (RC2) is now available for testing. Content information, including changes, can be found at https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng

Re: su starts behaving oddly sometimes on F19

On Fri, 2013-05-17 at 08:14 +0200, Jan Synacek wrote: > On 05/17/2013 07:29 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > This is a weird bug I've seen 3 or 4 times since upgrading to F19, and > > am having trouble pinning down. > > > > Occasionally, after my session has been up for some time, runs of 'su' > > s

Re: su starts behaving oddly sometimes on F19

Same here. Either before entering or after entering is slow. But not sure for what reason... -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

su starts behaving oddly sometimes on F19

This is a weird bug I've seen 3 or 4 times since upgrading to F19, and am having trouble pinning down. Occasionally, after my session has been up for some time, runs of 'su' start behaving oddly. After I enter the root password, it takes a long time - longer than the delay that's always happened w

Re: Fedora 19 Beta RC1 install

On 05/16/2013 09:30 PM, Lawrence Graves wrote: > When will the anaconda fix be added to Fedora 19 Beta RC1 in order to > complete an install. You can use the workaround right now: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=963503#c29 RC2 has been initiated: https://fedorahosted.org/rel-en

Re: Fedora 19 Beta RC1 install

On May 16, 2013, at 10:30 PM, Lawrence Graves wrote: > When will the anaconda fix be added to Fedora 19 Beta RC1 in order to > complete an install. When you yum install it. Or wait until there's an RC2. Chris Murphy-- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://

Fedora 19 Beta RC1 install

When will the anaconda fix be added to Fedora 19 Beta RC1 in order to complete an install. At the moment still unable to do an install. Have sent a bug report. -- All things are workable but don't all things work. Prov. 3:5 & 6 -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: h

Fedora 17 updates-testing report

The following Fedora 17 Security updates need testing: Age URL 315 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-10269/revelation-0.4.14-1.fc17 127 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-0455/fedora-business-cards-1-0.1.beta1.fc17 56 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/up

Fedora 18 updates-testing report

The following Fedora 18 Security updates need testing: Age URL 128 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-0416/fedora-business-cards-1-0.1.beta1.fc18 62 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-3935/puppet-3.1.1-1.fc18 55 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/

Re: Minor rawhide headsup

Thanks, it works. -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: getting removed from bug cc's as reporter

It's modified, I think this bug will be fixed soon. You get rid of it. :-) Thanks for reporting. Am 16.05.2013 22:31, schrieb Chris Murphy: On May 16, 2013, at 2:07 PM, Michael Spahn wrote: Hi, you can edit your mail settings here [1]. But it's a feature not a bug a reporter should get al

Re: getting removed from bug cc's as reporter

On May 16, 2013, at 2:07 PM, Michael Spahn wrote: > Hi, > > you can edit your mail settings here [1]. > > But it's a feature not a bug a reporter should get all these mails because > usually he is affected and waiting for a solution. I understand that, but in this case the bug is sorted out,

Re: getting removed from bug cc's as reporter

Hi, you can edit your mail settings here [1]. But it's a feature not a bug a reporter should get all these mails because usually he is affected and waiting for a solution. I would suggest to filter to a folder. Regards Michael [1] - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email

getting removed from bug cc's as reporter

I know how to do this if I'm not the bug reporter, but in the case of 963503 I am the bug reporter, and I'm getting a lot of emails I don't need. If there's a suggestion, great, otherwise I'll just filter it. Chris -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin

Re: PackageKit: Could not get update details

On Thu, 2013-05-16 at 10:50 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > Is this a showstopper for graphical updates? If so it should be > nominated as a Beta blocker. Thanks! If all is true, then +1 Blocker. -- Best Regards, Igor Gnatenko -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: ht

Re: PackageKit: Could not get update details

On Thu, 2013-05-16 at 18:14 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Thu, 16 May 2013 15:44:19 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote: > > > Different issue, there's something funky going on with encoding in > > yum/python and it's tripping up PackageKit. Can you file a bug please. > > > > Richard. > > 963810

Re: Fedora 19 Beta RC1

On Thu, 2013-05-16 at 11:20 -0600, Lawrence Graves wrote: > Fedora 19 Beta RC1 will not install. > -- > All things are workable but don't all things work. Prov. 3:5 & 6 See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=963503 -- Best Regards, Igor Gnatenko -- test mailing list test@lists.fedorap

Fedora 19 Beta RC1

Fedora 19 Beta RC1 will not install. -- All things are workable but don't all things work. Prov. 3:5 & 6 -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: PackageKit: Could not get update details

On Thu, 16 May 2013 15:44:19 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote: > Different issue, there's something funky going on with encoding in > yum/python and it's tripping up PackageKit. Can you file a bug please. > > Richard. 963810 -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://a

F18: Request for testing / karma

Hi, After upgrading to kernel 3.9.2 I have hit a rather bad bug where the kernel exposes rfkill device types that gnome-bluetooth and gnome-control-center do not know about causing gnome-shell to crash with a fail whale on login. I have fixed it upstream and backported the fixes to F18: https://a

Minor rawhide headsup

ModemManager had an issue that caused (at least my) yum updates to fail. There is a fixed build (ModemManager-0.7.990-2.git20130515.fc20) that you can grab from koji as one way to get today's updates. (Using yum update -y --exclude=ModemManager should also get most stuff updated.) -- test maili

Re: PackageKit: Could not get update details

On 16 May 2013 13:21, Kamil Paral wrote: > What was the command/application that you've executed? What is your locale > (type 'locale')? Different issue, there's something funky going on with encoding in yum/python and it's tripping up PackageKit. Can you file a bug please. Richard. -- test ma

Re: PackageKit: Could not get update details

On Thu, 16 May 2013 08:21:17 -0400 (EDT), Kamil Paral wrote: > What was the command/application that you've executed? What is your locale > (type 'locale')? > I've clicked on GNOME Shell's "Software Updates are available" notification, which started "gpk-update-viewer". Locale is en_US.UTF-8.

F-19 Branched report: 20130516 changes

Compose started at Thu May 16 09:15:02 UTC 2013 Broken deps for x86_64 -- [byzanz] byzanz-0.3-0.5.fc17.x86_64 requires libpanel-applet-4.so.0()(64bit) [deltacloud-core] deltacloud-core-rhevm-1.1.3-1.fc19.noarch requires rubyge

Re: PackageKit: Could not get update details

> Error Type: > Error Value: 'ascii' codec can't decode byte 0xc2 in position 49: ordinal not > in range(128) > File : /usr/share/PackageKit/helpers/yum/yumBackend.py, line 3590, in > > main() > File : /usr/share/PackageKit/helpers/yum/yumBackend.py, line 3587, in main > backend.dis

rawhide report: 20130516 changes

Compose started at Thu May 16 08:15:03 UTC 2013 Broken deps for x86_64 -- [LuxRender] LuxRender-blender-1.0-10.fc19.x86_64 requires blender(ABI) = 0:2.66 [blender] 1:fonts-blender-2.67-1.fc20.x86_64 requires blender = 0:2.67-1

PackageKit: Could not get update details

A normal "yum update" yesterday has not fixed it. Today the Updater runs into this exception again. No idea which package it refers to. It could be an already installed package found in the local RPM DB (such a problem has been encountered years ago). Could not get update details Failed to proce