On Sun, 2013-05-12 at 16:20 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> On May 12, 2013, at 4:10 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> >
> > On May 12, 2013, at 3:55 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> >>
> >> Just delete the F18 partitions? Who said you had to resize them?
> >
> > If the identical behavior occurred with
On Sun, 2013-05-12 at 16:24 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> On May 12, 2013, at 4:18 PM, "T.C. Hollingsworth"
> wrote:
> >
> > Found Windows Boot Manager on Microsoft/Boot/bootmgfw.efi
> > Windows Boot Manager is not yet supported by grub-mkconfig.
> > done
> >
> > Is this supposed to work with
On May 12, 2013, at 5:19 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> There's a debug line you can add to the grub.cfg, and possibly you'll get
> more information after the error but before the hang.
Helps to read the whole bug first. I see the debug info. I can't reproduce this
on Apple EFI hardware.
T.C. Hol
The following Fedora 18 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
124
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-0416/fedora-business-cards-1-0.1.beta1.fc18
57
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-3935/puppet-3.1.1-1.fc18
51
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/
The following Fedora 17 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
311
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-10269/revelation-0.4.14-1.fc17
123
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-0455/fedora-business-cards-1-0.1.beta1.fc17
52
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/up
On May 12, 2013, at 4:40 PM, T.C. Hollingsworth
wrote:
>
> I already use gummiboot, since GRUB2 can't boot Fedora on my system.
> [1] My main reason for trying this out was to see if GRUB2 could boot
> Windows, as that might be an interesting datapoint to add to that bug.
Not really, it's tot
On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 3:24 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> It's sorta messy to use GRUB2-EFI as a boot manager. Ideally the firmware
> manufacturer would supply a decent GUI boot manager so you can choose the OS,
> rather than rely on GRUB acting as a boot manager.
>
> The better alternative right n
On May 12, 2013, at 4:18 PM, "T.C. Hollingsworth"
wrote:
>
> Found Windows Boot Manager on Microsoft/Boot/bootmgfw.efi
> Windows Boot Manager is not yet supported by grub-mkconfig.
> done
>
> Is this supposed to work with grub2-mkconfig also, or only from anaconda?
It's sorta messy to use GRU
On May 12, 2013, at 4:10 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> On May 12, 2013, at 3:55 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>>
>> Just delete the F18 partitions? Who said you had to resize them?
>
> If the identical behavior occurred with existing ext4 installations, and the
> stated work around was to delete
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 4:14 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> If anyone has a UEFI install of Windows and can test installing F19 Beta
> TC4 alongside it, please do - the os-prober update should mean that the
> Windows install will now be present in Fedora's grub menu (before it was
> not).
I haven't
On May 12, 2013, at 3:55 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> Just delete the F18 partitions? Who said you had to resize them?
If the identical behavior occurred with existing ext4 installations, and the
stated work around was to delete the F18 install, people would be giving birth
to bovines well
On Sun, 2013-05-12 at 14:08 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> Originally I was thinking the installer's assertion that Btrfs is not
> resizable just needed a verbiage change to "Resize unsupported"
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962143
>
>
> But there's a consequence that makes this a s
Originally I was thinking the installer's assertion that Btrfs is not resizable
just needed a verbiage change to "Resize unsupported"
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962143
But there's a consequence that makes this a show stopper for Btrfs becoming the
eventual default file system.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=959727
In the case of creating two btrfs volumes, one of them consistently has a
default label "fedora" rather than the user specified name. There isn't a
release criteria that I'm finding which covers this case, but considering the
UI lets me specify
On 05/12/2013 09:24 AM, Mike Chambers wrote:
On Sat, 2013-05-11 at 14:13 -0700, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
I gave the systemctl command and rebooted.
Here is the result. I get the same result on
the target system with "telnet localhost".
Can't you use ssh instead anyway since it's o
On Sat, 2013-05-11 at 14:13 -0700, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
> I gave the systemctl command and rebooted.
> Here is the result. I get the same result on
> the target system with "telnet localhost".
>
Can't you use ssh instead anyway since it's on by default on all
installations now?
Compose started at Sun May 12 09:15:02 UTC 2013
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[byzanz]
byzanz-0.3-0.5.fc17.x86_64 requires libpanel-applet-4.so.0()(64bit)
[deltacloud-core]
deltacloud-core-1.0.5-2.fc19.noarch requires ruby(abi) =
Heya,
That's what I see while I boot today's Rawhide Kernel.
If you need more info, just ping me here.
==
...
[176092.303585] lock(&dev->device_lock);
[176092.307947]
[176092.307947] *** DEADLOCK ***
[176092.307947]
[176092.314943] 2 locks h
Compose started at Sun May 12 08:15:02 UTC 2013
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[claws-mail-plugins]
claws-mail-plugins-geolocation-3.9.0-7.fc20.x86_64 requires
claws-mail(plugin-api)(x86-64) = 0:3.9.0.122
[dragonegg]
dragonegg-3.1
19 matches
Mail list logo
