On Qua, 2013-05-08 at 22:28 +0530, piruthiviraj natarajan wrote:
> x264-libs-0.130-1.20130502git1db4621.fc20.x86_64 is a duplicate with
> x264-libs-0.129-3.20130305gite403db4.fc19.x86_64
>>Hi , can you check if today you can do ? please:
>>yum update
>>and after that
>>yum remove x264-libs-0.129
Hi
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 4:22 PM, Tom Callaway wrote:
> On 05/08/2013 02:47 PM, Dan Mashal wrote:
> > Who obsoleted gnome-panel? It is required by a ton of packages
>
> gnome-applet-sensors - probably should be blocked.
>
I have retired the rawhide branch as a provenpackager and filed a tic
On Wed, 2013-05-08 at 11:47 -0700, Dan Mashal wrote:
> Umm hi,
>
> Who obsoleted gnome-panel? It is required by a ton of packages.
>
We did, because GNOME no longer uses gnome-panel. All those packages
that require gnome-panel are applets, which are just as useless without
gnome-panel. If you w
On Wed, 2013-05-08 at 16:22 -0400, Tom Callaway wrote:
> On 05/08/2013 02:47 PM, Dan Mashal wrote:
> > Who obsoleted gnome-panel? It is required by a ton of packages.
>
> It appears to be needed by only:
> byzanz - optional panel applet, update building right now.
> cinnamon-menu-editor - Not sure
On 05/08/2013 02:47 PM, Dan Mashal wrote:
> Who obsoleted gnome-panel? It is required by a ton of packages.
It appears to be needed by only:
byzanz - optional panel applet, update building right now.
cinnamon-menu-editor - Not sure why this depends on gnome-panel.
gnome-applet-sensors - probably s
> > Compose finished at Wed May 8 12:20:02 UTC 2013
First please trim unneeded stuff from a reply.
> Umm hi,
>
> Who obsoleted gnome-panel? It is required by a ton of packages.
It was announced to the list as to why, it's dead upstream and doesn't
build with the current gnome and is in fact bro
#fedora-blocker-review: f19beta-blocker-review-4
Minutes:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2013-05-08/f19beta-blocker-review-4.2013-05-08-16.00.html
Minutes (text):
http://mee
At my friend all ok.
On Wed, 2013-05-08 at 22:48 +0530, piruthiviraj natarajan wrote:
> I spoke too fast. I have an unbootable system on all kernels I have installed.
>
> the error message right after loading the ramdisk image is
>
> audit: print k limit exceeded
>
> but I am able to reboot thou
I spoke too fast. I have an unbootable system on all kernels I have installed.
the error message right after loading the ramdisk image is
audit: print k limit exceeded
but I am able to reboot though.
Not sure if anything is related either.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To u
On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 09:35:34 -0700,
Adam Williamson wrote:
My recollection is that it's indicative of a packaging error, not a bug
in yum. The same happened in F19, btw, and the update was -1ed into
oblivion. I think _possibly_ this is what happens when you change a
directory into a symli
Adam Williamson wrote:
My recollection is that it's indicative of a packaging error, not a bug
in yum.
dnf doesn't choke on it.
- Felix
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Thanks Igor Gnatenko for the tip.
meanwhile I realize that I manually installed x264-libs from
rawhide-rpmfusion which had some conflict couple of days ago. But I
removed it and re installed the package now. I guess everything is
fine.
So i think its all my mistake.
yum install gnustep-base
Loaded
On Wed, 8 May 2013 11:30:51 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 21:27:11 +0530,
>piruthiviraj natarajan wrote:
> >Today's rawhide breaks this
> >
> >Transaction check error:
> > file /usr/lib64/GNUstep/DTDs from install of
> >gnustep-base-1.24.4-6.fc20.x86_64 conflicts wi
On Wed, 2013-05-08 at 11:30 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 21:27:11 +0530,
>piruthiviraj natarajan wrote:
> >Today's rawhide breaks this
> >
> >Transaction check error:
> > file /usr/lib64/GNUstep/DTDs from install of
> >gnustep-base-1.24.4-6.fc20.x86_64 conflicts wit
On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 21:27:11 +0530,
piruthiviraj natarajan wrote:
Today's rawhide breaks this
Transaction check error:
file /usr/lib64/GNUstep/DTDs from install of
gnustep-base-1.24.4-6.fc20.x86_64 conflicts with file from package
gnustep-base-1.24.4-5.fc20.x86_64
I have filed a bug ag
On Qua, 2013-05-08 at 21:27 +0530, piruthiviraj natarajan wrote:
> Today's rawhide breaks this
>
> Transaction check error:
> file /usr/lib64/GNUstep/DTDs from install of
> gnustep-base-1.24.4-6.fc20.x86_64 conflicts with file from package
> gnustep-base-1.24.4-5.fc20.x86_64
>
> Error Summary
It could be dangerous!!! Not verified!!!
# rpm -e --justdb --nodeps gnustep-base
# yum install gnustep-base
On Wed, 2013-05-08 at 21:27 +0530, piruthiviraj natarajan wrote:
> Today's rawhide breaks this
>
> Transaction check error:
> file /usr/lib64/GNUstep/DTDs from install of
> gnustep-base-1.
Today's rawhide breaks this
Transaction check error:
file /usr/lib64/GNUstep/DTDs from install of
gnustep-base-1.24.4-6.fc20.x86_64 conflicts with file from package
gnustep-base-1.24.4-5.fc20.x86_64
Error Summary
-
Cleared the cache, tried to update many times can't get beyond this
On Wed, 2013-05-08 at 06:37 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 05/08/2013 04:29 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Wed, 2013-05-08 at 06:25 +0400, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> >> Yes. I have internet. I think that mock hasn't /etc/resolv.conf..
> >
> > I don't think Fedora packages are supposed to require
Compose started at Wed May 8 09:15:02 UTC 2013
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[byzanz]
byzanz-0.3-0.5.fc17.x86_64 requires libpanel-applet-4.so.0()(64bit)
[cinnamon]
cinnamon-menu-editor-1.6.7-7.fc19.noarch requires gnome-panel
[d
20 matches
Mail list logo
