Hi folks! Time for the first blocker status mail of the Fedora 19 cycle.
The tl;dr summary:
Karma needed for:
*
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-5141/systemd-201-1.fc19,initial-setup-0.3.4-3.fc19
*
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-5027/libreport-2.1.3-2.f
On 08/04/13 07:52 PM, nonamedotc wrote:
On 04/08/2013 09:42 PM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
Just curious, what kernel version is included in this?
FC
[root@localhost ~]# uname -r
3.9.0-0.rc5.git1.301.fc19.x86_64
That is not what's in the Alpha RC1 images. They have 3.9.0-0.rc4.git0.1 .
--
Adam
On 04/08/2013 09:42 PM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
Just curious, what kernel version is included in this?
FC
[root@localhost ~]# uname -r
3.9.0-0.rc5.git1.301.fc19.x86_64
--
nonamedotc
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/list
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 7:43 PM, Andre Robatino
wrote:
> *IMPORTANT*: Same images as with 19 Alpha TC3, TC4, and TC5 are over
> their size targets (all DVDs and Lives with the exception of Live KDE
> and Live SoaS).
>
> As per the Fedora 19 schedule [1], Fedora 19 Alpha Release Candidate 1
> (RC1)
As always, minutes and IRC transcript available on the wiki at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Meetings/20130408
Next meeting is scheduled for 2013-04-15 at 1500 UTC in #fedora-meeting.
If you have topics you think we should bring up at the
meeting, please add them to the Wiki page at
https
*IMPORTANT*: Same images as with 19 Alpha TC3, TC4, and TC5 are over
their size targets (all DVDs and Lives with the exception of Live KDE
and Live SoaS).
As per the Fedora 19 schedule [1], Fedora 19 Alpha Release Candidate 1
(RC1) is now available for testing. Content information, including
chang
The following Fedora 17 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
276
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-10269/revelation-0.4.14-1.fc17
89
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-0455/fedora-business-cards-1-0.1.beta1.fc17
59
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/up
On 04/08/2013 07:39 PM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
I don't see any mention of Wine. It should be a blocker.
KDE and Xfce can be used instead of Gnome, but there is no substitute
for Wine.
Wine is not a blocker, let alone a alpha blocker and probably never will
be a blocker.
JBG
-
On 08/04/13 02:38 PM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
What should I use for running Win apps on Linux instead of Wine?
Not every possible capability of a Fedora system can be considered a
release blocker. There isn't any obvious alternative to wine except an
emulated copy of Windows (leg
On 04/08/2013 01:24 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 04/09/13 03:49, John Dulaney wrote:
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2013 12:39:40 -0700
From: c...@omen.com
To: test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: Re: F19 Alpha Blocker Bug Review #5 Minutes
I don't see any mention of Wine. It should be a blocker.
KDE and Xfce
On 04/09/13 03:49, John Dulaney wrote:
>> Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2013 12:39:40 -0700
>> From: c...@omen.com
>> To: test@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> Subject: Re: F19 Alpha Blocker Bug Review #5 Minutes
>>
>> I don't see any mention of Wine. It should be a blocker.
>>
>> KDE and Xfce can be used instead of
> Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2013 12:39:40 -0700
> From: c...@omen.com
> To: test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Subject: Re: F19 Alpha Blocker Bug Review #5 Minutes
>
> I don't see any mention of Wine. It should be a blocker.
>
> KDE and Xfce can be used instead of Gnome, but there is no substitute
> for Wine.
>
I don't see any mention of Wine. It should be a blocker.
KDE and Xfce can be used instead of Gnome, but there is no substitute
for Wine.
--
Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX c...@omen.com www.omen.com
Developer of Industrial ZMODEM(Tm) for Embedded Applications
Omen Technology Inc "The Hi
On Sat, Apr 06, 2013 at 10:35:32AM +0200, Joachim Backes wrote:
> sudo yum groupinstall 'Cinnamon Desktop'
>
> Loaded plugins: langpacks, refresh-packagekit
> Warning: environment Cinnamon Desktop does not exist.
> No packages in any requested group available to install or update
>
> Anybody sees
On Mon, 8 Apr 2013 13:57:43 -0400 (EDT)
Kamil Paral wrote:
> > Also, you could try disabling slug_debug on boot with the normal
>
> I see you also have the tendency to call it SLUG instead of SLUB.
> It would be a more appropriate name, I think :-)
ha. Oops.
> Also, you could try disabling slug_debug on boot with the normal
I see you also have the tendency to call it SLUG instead of SLUB.
It would be a more appropriate name, I think :-)
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin
=
#fedora-blocker-review: f19alpha-blocker-review-5
=
Minutes:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2013-04-08/f19alpha-blocker-review-5.2013-04-08-16.01.html
Minutes (text):
http:/
Join us on irc.freenode.net in #fedora-meeting-1 for this important
meeting, wherein we shall determine the readiness of the Fedora 19 Alpha.
Thursday, April 11, 2013 17:00 UTC (1 PM EDT, 10 AM PDT, 19:00 CEST)
"Before each public release Development, QA and Release Engineering meet
to determine
On Mon, 8 Apr 2013 04:36:46 -0700
"T.C. Hollingsworth" wrote:
> Rawhide kernels have debugging options enabled, which can cause
> significant slowdowns in many situations. Try using the
> rawhide-kernel-nodebug repository to get non-debug kernels for Rawhide
> and see if your problems persist:
>
It has a Intel 2nd generation video controller (sandy bridge family)
and the driver is i915 which should be the less problematic driver I
think.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
On 04/08/13 06:52, Ozan Çağlayan wrote:
>> Rawhide kernels have debugging options enabled, which can cause
>> significant slowdowns in many situations. Try using the
>> rawhide-kernel-nodebug repository to get non-debug kernels for Rawhide
>> and see if your problems persist:
>> http://fedoraproje
Compose started at Mon Apr 8 09:15:19 UTC 2013
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[aeolus-conductor]
aeolus-conductor-0.10.6-2.fc19.noarch requires ruby(abi) = 0:1.9.1
[alexandria]
alexandria-0.6.9-4.fc19.noarch requires ruby(abi) >=
> Rawhide kernels have debugging options enabled, which can cause
> significant slowdowns in many situations. Try using the
> rawhide-kernel-nodebug repository to get non-debug kernels for Rawhide
> and see if your problems persist:
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/RawhideKernelNodebug
Ah I knew a
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 4:26 AM, Ozan Çağlayan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I don't know where to start for debugging but current rawhide on my
> SandyBridge laptop is barely usable. Even a window switch takes 1-2
> seconds. I looked over powertop and top outputs, load average when
> idle (even no gnome-termin
Hi,
I don't know where to start for debugging but current rawhide on my
SandyBridge laptop is barely usable. Even a window switch takes 1-2
seconds. I looked over powertop and top outputs, load average when
idle (even no gnome-terminal, ran the commands on VT) can be between
0.8-1.1. Xorg is gener
Compose started at Mon Apr 8 08:15:20 UTC 2013
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[TurboGears2]
TurboGears2-2.1.4-5.fc19.noarch requires python-webob <= 0:1.1.1
[aeolus-conductor]
aeolus-conductor-0.10.6-2.fc19.noarch requires ruby(ab
Thanks both.
Sent from Subor Gameplayer
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
27 matches
Mail list logo
