Fedora 17 updates-testing report

2013-03-23 Thread updates
The following Fedora 17 Security updates need testing: Age URL 261 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-10269/revelation-0.4.14-1.fc17 73 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-0455/fedora-business-cards-1-0.1.beta1.fc17 43 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/up

Re: Criterion proposal: firstboot / initial-setup / gnome-initial-setup, user creationa

2013-03-23 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sat, 2013-03-23 at 23:02 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > On 03/23/2013 08:07 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Sat, 2013-03-23 at 07:32 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > > > >> The criteria should *only* be focusing on the common denominator in both > >> these tools the rest should

Re: Criterion proposal: firstboot / initial-setup / gnome-initial-setup, user creationa

2013-03-23 Thread Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
On 03/23/2013 08:07 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: On Sat, 2013-03-23 at 07:32 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: The criteria should *only* be focusing on the common denominator in both these tools the rest should be left out from the criteria. No hidden crap or meaning anywhere. Sorry, but I

Re: Criterion proposal: firstboot / initial-setup / gnome-initial-setup, user creationa

2013-03-23 Thread Ankur Sinha
On Sat, 2013-03-23 at 11:15 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > Um? I don't think firstboot does that. There's nothing to make > firstboot > run on upgrades. So far as I know, there's no code anywhere that > fiddles > with user accounts on upgrade in the normal case, they're just left > alone. Ah, yes

Re: Espeak gags Fedora 19 and rawhide

2013-03-23 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sat, 23 Mar 2013 11:12:35 -0700 Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote: > Tried installing from today's local rsyncs or f19 and rawhide > using the F18 pxeboot installation. Even a "basic desktop" > install fails with an error on the espeak package, let alone > xfce or kde. https://bugzilla.redh

Re: Espeak gags Fedora 19 and rawhide

2013-03-23 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sat, 2013-03-23 at 11:12 -0700, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote: > Tried installing from today's local rsyncs or f19 and rawhide > using the F18 pxeboot installation. Even a "basic desktop" > install fails with an error on the espeak package, let alone > xfce or kde. Way ahead of ya: https

Re: Criterion proposal: firstboot / initial-setup / gnome-initial-setup, user creationa

2013-03-23 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sat, 2013-03-23 at 20:44 +1100, Ankur Sinha wrote: > Hi Adam, > > On Fri, 2013-03-22 at 17:00 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > We modify the post-install requirements like this: > > > > * A system installed with a graphical package set must boot to an > > initial setup utility on the first bo

Espeak gags Fedora 19 and rawhide

2013-03-23 Thread Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R
Tried installing from today's local rsyncs or f19 and rawhide using the F18 pxeboot installation. Even a "basic desktop" install fails with an error on the espeak package, let alone xfce or kde. The images and liveos directories disappeared from the fc19 rsync so I was unable to attempt installi

Re: abrt broken for f19

2013-03-23 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sat, 23 Mar 2013 13:19:34 +0100 Michael Schwendt wrote: ...snip... Cannot answer those issues, but... > In GNOME Shell I get desktop notifications about problems that have > been detected. Yet when I click "Report", nothing happens. Sometimes > ABRT reports kernel problems, but claims that

Re: abrt broken for f19

2013-03-23 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Sat, 16 Mar 2013 14:01:23 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > Just a heads-up: abrt for F19 is currently busted for two reasons. It has become more troublesome even before that for multiple reasons. Failures to use the retrace server. Long time-out before the message that something has been unsu

Re: Unable to run mock builds for rawhide on Fedora 18: ERROR: Could not find useradd in chroot, maybe the install failed?

2013-03-23 Thread Daniel J Walsh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/22/2013 11:13 PM, Ankur Sinha wrote: > Hi folks, > > I sent this mail to devel earlier, and got zilch. Any clues on what's > wrong? Is the rawhide buildroot borked? Is it a mock bug? How do we test > builds for rawhide? > > I've been having t

Re: Criterion proposal: firstboot / initial-setup / gnome-initial-setup, user creationa

2013-03-23 Thread Ankur Sinha
Hi Adam, On Fri, 2013-03-22 at 17:00 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > We modify the post-install requirements like this: > > * A system installed with a graphical package set must boot to an > initial setup utility on the first boot after installation. The > firstboot utility must be able to creat

Re: Criterion proposal: firstboot / initial-setup / gnome-initial-setup, user creationa

2013-03-23 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sat, 2013-03-23 at 07:32 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > The criteria should *only* be focusing on the common denominator in both > these tools the rest should be left out from the criteria. > > No hidden crap or meaning anywhere. Sorry, but I can't parse this at all. The proposal fo

Re: Criterion proposal: firstboot / initial-setup / gnome-initial-setup, user creationa

2013-03-23 Thread Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
On 03/23/2013 12:00 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: Our current firstboot-related criteria call out 'firstboot' by name: * A system installed with a graphical package set must boot to the 'firstboot' utility on the first boot after installation. The firstboot utility must be able to create a working