Hey, folks. CCing anaconda list on this one due to the changes to the
partitioning requirements (see below) - please send replies to test@,
though, to avoid a thread fork.
Further to my previous mail -
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/2013-March/114198.html -
I've now got a firs
Hey folks. wwoods reminded me today that we were meant to expand the
upgrade test case set. We re-wrote the upgrade criterion to cover all
release-blocking desktops and minimal installs, but we didn't expand the
test case set to cover those cases.
The changes seemed like a pretty obvious deriv
The following Fedora 17 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
252
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-10269/revelation-0.4.14-1.fc17
64
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-0455/fedora-business-cards-1-0.1.beta1.fc17
34
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/up
On Mar 14, 2013, at 2:18 PM, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 09:12:58PM +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
>>
>> Le Jeu 14 mars 2013 20:57, Adam Williamson a écrit :
>>
>>> So - don't get bitten by this :) If you really want to get on the F19
>>> branch, then just make sure you hand-che
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 09:12:58PM +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
>
> Le Jeu 14 mars 2013 20:57, Adam Williamson a écrit :
>
> > So - don't get bitten by this :) If you really want to get on the F19
> > branch, then just make sure you hand-check your grub config file before
> > rebooting.
>
Le Jeu 14 mars 2013 20:57, Adam Williamson a écrit :
> So - don't get bitten by this :) If you really want to get on the F19
> branch, then just make sure you hand-check your grub config file before
> rebooting.
Thank you for posting this I was trying to understand why grub refused to
propose ne
So I installed fedora-release from the F19 repo and did a yum
distro-sync today. Then I installed a new kernel build. Then I rebooted.
Then nothing would boot at all.
It turns out this is because the release name of Fedora 19 is:
Schrödinger's Cat
with a single quote used as an apostrophe. Th
- Original Message -
> Gnome still fails with "something gone wrong".
May well be because I tried to enable the Wayland clutter backend yesterday for
some testing, and didn't expect it to be preferred of X. We've fixed that this
morning.
> I guess we can do without Gnome anyway.
Alw
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 6:46 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
>>> Summary:
>>> Added Packages: 1
>>> Removed Packages: 1
>>> Upgraded Packages: 45
>>> Size of added packages: 5107 (5.0 k)
>>> Size change of modified packages: 8168436 (7.8 M)
>>> Size of removed packages: 29396 (29 k)
>>> Size change: 814
>> Summary:
>> Added Packages: 1
>> Removed Packages: 1
>> Upgraded Packages: 45
>> Size of added packages: 5107 (5.0 k)
>> Size change of modified packages: 8168436 (7.8 M)
>> Size of removed packages: 29396 (29 k)
>> Size change: 8144147 (7.8 M)
>> Compose finisheded at Thu Mar 14 10:51:53 UTC 20
#366: OpenStack test day request for April 2nd
--+--
Reporter: pbrady| Owner:
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone:
Component: Test Day | Version:
Keywords:| Blocked By:
Blocking:
11 matches
Mail list logo
