As always, minutes and IRC transcript available on the wiki at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Meetings/20130311
Next meeting is scheduled for 2013-03-18 at 1500 UTC in #fedora-meeting.
If you have topics you think we should bring up at the
meeting, please add them to the Wiki page at
https
On 11/03/13 08:17 AM, Kamil Paral wrote:
I'm not fully convinced on the presentation style, I find the
collapsible comments to be more visible than the criteria themselves
(they are bold and highlighted, so they draw more attention), but
that's something that we can tweak easily.
I tried to com
Ankur thanks for for you repliy.
I will hold until next kernel update and if the problem persist
I will BZ it. In the interim I will try to debug the boot failure
Best regards
- Original Message -
On Mon, 2013-03-11 at 18:40 -0400, ergodic wrote:
> It will not boot in my machine
No issue
On 09/03/13 01:09 PM, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
On 03/09/2013 03:57 PM, drago01 wrote:
On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 7:14 PM, Clyde E. Kunkel
wrote:
The notification area seems to be missing. On purpose, or is it a bug?
It isn't missing and it isn't a bug. You just have to push your mouse
against the
On 11/03/13 03:35 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
- Original Message -
Hey folks! So I had an action item from the meeting on Monday:
"adamw to draft up changes to the test day process docs to
accommodate
test days being on any day, test day co-ordinator to ensure they're
balanced out"
In f
On 11/03/13 09:41 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Greetings.
I'd like to propose we create a rawhide tracker bug.
Probibly name it: RawhideBlocker
(But I don't care what colour the bikeshed is)
This bug would be used for the following types of bugs against the
'rawhide' version:
- bugs that prevent th
On Mon, 2013-03-11 at 18:40 -0400, ergodic wrote:
> It will not boot in my machine
No issue booting here.
Linux dhcppc1 3.8.2-206.fc18.x86_64 #1 SMP Fri Mar 8 15:03:34 UTC 2013
x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Please file a bug.
--
Thanks,
Warm regards,
Ankur: "FranciscoD"
Please only print if
Before I file a Bugzilla, has anyone have problems with
kernel-3.8.2-206.fc18.x86_64?
It will not boot in my machine. Asus P5K Delux, Core2 Quad CPU @ 2.40GHz, 6GiB
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
#336: ARM as primary arch
---+---
Reporter: jdulaney | Owner: jdulaney
Type: task | Status: assigned
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 19
Component: Release criteria |Version:
Resolu
On Mon, 11 Mar 2013 05:52:09 -0400 (EDT)
Kamil Paral wrote:
> > > I have a feeling that I haven't explained properly that the core
> > > of the proposal is a SOP change, and the web app workflow is just
> > > a bonus to make it prettier. Is it clearer now? Do you still have
> > > the same concern
On Mon, 11 Mar 2013 17:45:26 +0200
moshe nahmias wrote:
> I like better the grey background with normal text, it makes the lines
> easier to find and breaks the monotonous white background.
> On the other hand it's a matter of taste more then anything.
I'm also +1 to the grey background. It brea
On Fri, 08 Mar 2013 17:24:38 -0800
Adam Williamson wrote:
> DESIGN STUFF
>
>
> * group the criteria into a few sections, and made (almost) each
> individual criterion a sub-section - this might seem a bit odd at
> first, but it breaks up the 'wall of text' flow, makes the table of
> - bugs that break the rawhide buildroot. In practice these are
> usually
> noticed pretty quickly and the offending build is just untagged
> until
> it can be fixed, but there could be cases where the fix is more
> complex and has a bug associated with it.
For those of us who are not ski
Greetings.
I'd like to propose we create a rawhide tracker bug.
Probibly name it: RawhideBlocker
(But I don't care what colour the bikeshed is)
This bug would be used for the following types of bugs against the
'rawhide' version:
- bugs that prevent the daily rawhide compose from completing.
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 11:45 AM, moshe nahmias wrote:
> I like better the grey background with normal text, it makes the lines
> easier to find and breaks the monotonous white background.
> On the other hand it's a matter of taste more then anything.
I have to agree here -- I like the gray backg
I like better the grey background with normal text, it makes the lines
easier to find and breaks the monotonous white background.
On the other hand it's a matter of taste more then anything.
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 5:17 PM, Kamil Paral wrote:
> > I'm not fully convinced on the presentation style
> I'm not fully convinced on the presentation style, I find the
> collapsible comments to be more visible than the criteria themselves
> (they are bold and highlighted, so they draw more attention), but
> that's something that we can tweak easily.
I tried to come up with a few more designs of the
Compose started at Mon Mar 11 08:15:06 UTC 2013
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[HippoDraw]
HippoDraw-python-1.21.3-6.fc19.x86_64 requires
libboost_python.so.1.50.0()(64bit)
[OpenEXR_Viewers]
OpenEXR_Viewers-1.0.2-10.fc19.x86_64 re
On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 8:24 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> I don't think I've completely nailed the *design*, though, so it's
> important to remember these two things are separable, to a degree.
I think the layout and the content are much better, so thank you.
Sure, the design isn't perfect -- but
> Looks good, but I do have 2 things, one that isn't clear to me and
> one suggestion to make things clearer.
Thanks for your feedback!
> On the "Package sets" paragraph, it says "the installer must be able
> to install each of the release blocking desktops, as well as the
> minimal package set."
#362: Test day Request for 6/6/13
---+---
Reporter: dpal | Owner: tflink
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 19
Component: Test Day |Version:
Resolution:| Keywords:
Blocked
- Original Message -
> Hey folks! So I had an action item from the meeting on Monday:
>
> "adamw to draft up changes to the test day process docs to
> accommodate
> test days being on any day, test day co-ordinator to ensure they're
> balanced out"
>
> In fact, though, looking at the wiki
> > I have a feeling that I haven't explained properly that the core of
> > the proposal is a SOP change, and the web app workflow is just a
> > bonus to make it prettier. Is it clearer now? Do you still have
> > the same concerns?
>
> To an extent, yeah. I guess I just feel like the 'manual' vers
- Original Message -
> May be I didn't understand you right or I don't understand the whole
> point of FE so tell me if I'm wrong.
> As I understand it your proposal is that a bug that no one is willing
> to fix can't be a FE, right?
> If that's the case then I think it's wrong, since th
u - please check!
This is a reminder of the upcoming QA meeting. Please add any topic
suggestions to the meeting wiki page:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Meetings/20130311
The current proposed agenda is included below.
== Proposed Agenda Topics ==
1. Previous meeting follow-up
2. Fedora 19
25 matches
Mail list logo
