On 05/03/13 05:53 PM, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
The Fedora-19-Nightly-20130225.08 live cd cant partition a disk with an
existing os
and existing room, the 0303 composition that followed is broken, I understood a
new
one was on route.
Either my bz searching could use for improvement, or I must b
On 05/03/13 09:09 PM, Ankur Sinha wrote:
On Wed, 2013-03-06 at 15:48 +1100, Ankur Sinha wrote:
I tried installing rawhide via a netiso. Apparently, Anaconda does not
let you configure repositories at the moment. I found this[1] on
googling.
Clarifying: This is with the F18 installer's anaconda
On 04/03/13 08:23 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Mon, 4 Mar 2013 21:14:36 -0500
Shalom Ben-Zvi wrote:
OK
I didn't use yum with *--nogpgcheck* and probably that's why I
didn't have the expected results.
Possibly. If you re-run the distro-sync with --nogpgcheck does it
change anything?
I did it
On 03/06/13 15:48, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
>> Why don't you try setting up a smaller share to see if that influences
>> anything?
>>
>>
> Mounts of 1.52 TB and 44 GB shares fail the same way.
Try tracing the network exchange? Trying using a different Windows
box/version? I don't
On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 09:27:49PM -0800, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
> After a routine yum update at omen.com,
> the previously reported mount.cifs breakage has spread from rawhide
> to Fedora 18.
>
> It gives:
> mount error(22): Invalid argument
> Refer to the mount.cifs(8) manual page
On 03/05/2013 11:16 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 03/06/13 15:10, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
On 03/05/2013 11:04 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 03/06/13 14:40, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
On 03/05/2013 10:04 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
mount -t cifs //silly/Pictures /home/egreshko/silly -o
g
On 03/03/13 12:41 PM, Andre Robatino wrote:
John Dulaney fedoraproject.org> writes:
The test list is not the place to post problems with proprietary software that
is not in the Fedora repos.
It's not proprietary, everything except Oracle's extension pack is GPL2.
https://www.virtualbox.org/
On 03/03/13 04:28 AM, Eduardo Jorge wrote:
It's very important to update Mesa from version 9.0.0 to 9.0.3.
Versions 9.0.1, 9.0.2 and 9.0.3 accumulate a lot of bug fixes.
Thank you.
Fedora's graphics stack maintainers are deeply involved in the
maintenance of the kernel, X, and mesa. Yo
On 03/06/13 15:16, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> The only difference I can surmise is that my command refers to a 2 TB share
>> on a 64 bit Windows 7 machine.
>> >
>> > If I change the address from the .17 to a nonexistent .127 the invalid
>> > argument error goes away.
>> > (the command times out).
>> >
Hi folks,
Just tried this one in both virt-manager (qemu-kvm) and gnome-boxes and
it would show the "Start fedora" screen, after which it'd fall to a
dracut shell with errors to do with an unrecognized file system. The
screen-shot is here[1]. I checked up journalctl but it gave the same
error at t
On 03/06/13 15:10, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
> On 03/05/2013 11:04 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> On 03/06/13 14:40, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
>>> On 03/05/2013 10:04 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
mount -t cifs //silly/Pictures /home/egreshko/silly -o
gid=egreshko,uid=egreshko,pass
On 03/05/2013 11:04 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 03/06/13 14:40, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
On 03/05/2013 10:04 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
mount -t cifs //silly/Pictures /home/egreshko/silly -o
gid=egreshko,uid=egreshko,password=xx,username=xx
root@omen etc]# mount -t cifs //192.168.1
On 03/06/13 14:40, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
> On 03/05/2013 10:04 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> mount -t cifs //silly/Pictures /home/egreshko/silly -o
>> gid=egreshko,uid=egreshko,password=xx,username=xx
> root@omen etc]# mount -t cifs //192.168.1.17/S /s -o
> gid=omen,uid=caf,passw
On 03/06/13 14:42, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
> On 03/05/2013 10:04 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> On 03/06/13 13:27, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
>>> After a routine yum update at omen.com,
>>> the previously reported mount.cifs breakage has spread from rawhide to
>>> Fedora 18.
>>>
>>>
On 03/05/2013 10:04 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 03/06/13 13:27, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
After a routine yum update at omen.com,
the previously reported mount.cifs breakage has spread from rawhide to Fedora
18.
It gives:
mount error(22): Invalid argument
Refer to the mount.cifs(8) manu
On 03/05/2013 10:04 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
mount -t cifs //silly/Pictures /home/egreshko/silly -o
gid=egreshko,uid=egreshko,password=xx,username=xx
root@omen etc]# mount -t cifs //192.168.1.17/S /s -o
gid=omen,uid=caf,password=,username=caf
mount error(22): Invalid argument
Refer to
On 03/06/13 13:27, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
> After a routine yum update at omen.com,
> the previously reported mount.cifs breakage has spread from rawhide to Fedora
> 18.
>
> It gives:
> mount error(22): Invalid argument
> Refer to the mount.cifs(8) manual page (e.g. man mount.cifs)
>
After a routine yum update at omen.com,
the previously reported mount.cifs breakage has spread from rawhide to
Fedora 18.
It gives:
mount error(22): Invalid argument
Refer to the mount.cifs(8) manual page (e.g. man mount.cifs)
man mount.cifs has not changed at all.
Is this botch breakage or a
On Wed, 2013-03-06 at 15:48 +1100, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> I tried installing rawhide via a netiso. Apparently, Anaconda does not
> let you configure repositories at the moment. I found this[1] on
> googling.
Clarifying: This is with the F18 installer's anaconda.
>
> Thinking aloud here: do you th
> If anyone has some time and is willing to help out, could you try to get
> a rawhide install by booting a f18 dvd/netinstall and trying to enable
> just the rawhide repo and disable the rest. Does anaconda even allow
> you to do this anymore these days? Does it work?
I booted Fedora-18-x86_64-DV
On Tue, 2013-03-05 at 12:35 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> If anyone has some time and is willing to help out, could you try to
> get
> a rawhide install by booting a f18 dvd/netinstall and trying to enable
> just the rawhide repo and disable the rest. Does anaconda even allow
> you to do this anymore
>If anyone has some time and is willing to help out, could you try to get
>a rawhide install by booting a f18 dvd/netinstall and trying to enable
>just the rawhide repo and disable the rest. Does anaconda even allow
>you to do this anymore these days? Does it work?
Yeah, I read through it hoping
The Fedora-19-Nightly-20130225.08 live cd cant partition a disk with an
existing os
and existing room, the 0303 composition that followed is broken, I understood a
new
one was on route.
Either my bz searching could use for improvement, or I must be blind, but I was
sure
there was an open bug o
While there was a Fedora 19 blocker bug review meeting scheduled for
tomorrow, there are currently no blockers proposed and only one freeze
exception proposed for F19 alpha.
It seems a bit excessive to call a meeting to review a single bug and
thus, the review meeting tomorrow is canceled.
Tim
The following Fedora 17 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
243
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-10269/revelation-0.4.14-1.fc17
84
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-20092/libproxy-0.4.11-1.fc17
59
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-20
#360: MariaDB test day for F19
---+---
Reporter: hhorak| Owner:
Type: defect| Status: closed
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 19
Component: Test Day |Version:
Resolution: fixed | Keywords:
Blocked By:
Greetings.
I'm looking to revamp our rawhide wiki page:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/Rawhide
The (lengthy) section on "installing rawhide" is confusing and I
suspect out of date. ;)
If anyone has some time and is willing to help out, could you try to get
a rawhide install by booti
On Tue, 05 Mar 2013 10:54:58 -0800
Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
> I installed the development and creative workstation from today's
> rawhide. After booting Gnome did its "something gone wrong" screen.
>
> I then installed the Xfce desktop. As usual, xfce4-terminal had to be
> installed
I installed the development and creative workstation from today's rawhide.
After booting Gnome did its "something gone wrong" screen.
I then installed the Xfce desktop. As usual, xfce4-terminal had to be
installed manually. Xfce should get some more attention as Xfce seems
to be the only front
On Tue, 5 Mar 2013 10:10:56 -0700
Tim Flink wrote:
> As we're due to have our first blocker review meeting tomorrow, I'm
> going to be taking the tracking app down for maintenance and upgrade
> later today.
>
> I assume that nobody is using it at the moment, so I'll be bringing
> the app down at
As we're due to have our first blocker review meeting tomorrow, I'm
going to be taking the tracking app down for maintenance and upgrade
later today.
I assume that nobody is using it at the moment, so I'll be bringing the
app down at 18:00 UTC. The upgrade shouldn't take long and I expect to
be do
#296: Fix blocker bug tracker page and replace it with a static HTML page
-+---
Reporter: adamwill| Owner: tflink
Type: task| Status: closed
Priority: major
Compose started at Tue Mar 5 08:15:06 UTC 2013
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[HippoDraw]
HippoDraw-python-1.21.3-6.fc19.x86_64 requires
libboost_python.so.1.50.0()(64bit)
[condor]
condor-plumage-7.9.1-0.1.fc19.4.x86_64 requires
#360: MariaDB test day for F19
---+---
Reporter: hhorak| Owner:
Type: defect| Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 19
Component: Test Day |Version:
Resolution:| Keywords:
Blocked By:
On 03/05/2013 05:02 AM, test-requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org wrote:
Send test mailing list submissions to
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
or, via email, send a message wi
On Mon, 4 Mar 2013 21:23:23 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Mar 2013 21:14:36 -0500
> Shalom Ben-Zvi wrote:
>
> > OK
> > I didn't use yum with *--nogpgcheck* and probably that's why I
> > didn't have the expected results.
>
> Possibly. If you re-run the distro-sync with --nogpgcheck does
36 matches
Mail list logo
