On Mon, 4 Mar 2013 21:14:36 -0500
Shalom Ben-Zvi wrote:
> OK
> I didn't use yum with *--nogpgcheck* and probably that's why I
> didn't have the expected results.
Possibly. If you re-run the distro-sync with --nogpgcheck does it
change anything?
> I did it correctly now and I have the rawhide r
On Mon, 2013-03-04 at 17:58 -0700, Lawrence Graves wrote:
> Does anyone know why vmware workstation won't compile? I am running the
> lastest kernel 3.8.1-201. It ran before the update of kernel.
> --
> All things are workable but don't all things work. Prov. 3:5 & 6
"won't compile" is too vague
OK
I didn't use yum with *--nogpgcheck* and probably that's why I didn't have
the expected results.
I did it correctly now and I have the rawhide repo , updated and all went
fine.
only now I can't boot,
Its a uefi installation, secore boot disabled.
I restarted after the yum --releasever=rawhide
On 03/04/2013 08:42 AM, Fedora Rawhide Report wrote:
[mediawiki119-HTTP302Found]
mediawiki119-HTTP302Found-2.0.1-3.fc19.noarch requires mediawiki119
[mediawiki119-RSS]
mediawiki119-RSS-2.16-4.fc19.noarch requires mediawiki119
[mediawiki119-intersection]
mediawiki119-inters
Does anyone know why vmware workstation won't compile? I am running the
lastest kernel 3.8.1-201. It ran before the update of kernel.
--
All things are workable but don't all things work. Prov. 3:5 & 6
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.o
113898.html
As agreed in the QA meeting earlier today [1] , I've enabled the
defaultcc plugin in the Fedora QA trac.
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Meetings/20130304
There were a minor kinks in the process (as seen from a few stray
emails) but I think that trac should be sending out emai
#81: Add i18n release criteria
---+---
Reporter: jlaska| Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: reopened
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 14
Component: Release criteria |Version:
Resolut
On Tue, 05 Mar 2013 00:55:23 +0200, shalom9...@gmail.com wrote:
> I did:
> # yum --releasever=rawhide install fedora-release-rawhide
> # yum --releasever=rawhide distro-sync
> I compared the yum.repos.d folder to the original before the update and
> nothing changed there, like my repos are still
#356: Blocker Proposal is Slow
---+-
Reporter: tflink| Owner: tflink
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: Undetermined Future
Hello list
I'm new to fedora. and I usually like a rolling release.
So I just upgraded a fresh fedora 18 kde install to rawhide using the
instructions here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/Rawhide?rd=Rawhide
I did:
# yum --releasever=rawhide install fedora-release-rawhide
# yum --releasev
#360: MariaDB test day for F19
---+---
Reporter: hhorak| Owner:
Type: defect| Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 19
Component: Test Day |Version:
Resolution:| Keywords:
Blocked By:
On 01/03/13 12:19 AM, Kamil Paral wrote:
By the way, I see this topic relevant just for developers of one of Fedora QA
apps, it doesn't really influence the testers community in any way - the email
notifications influence them (and the solution is clear there), not the trac
location. So I wou
#360: MariaDB test day for F19
---+---
Reporter: hhorak| Owner:
Type: defect| Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 19
Component: Test Day |Version:
Resolution:| Keywords:
Blocked By:
#360: MariaDB test day for F19
---+---
Reporter: hhorak| Owner:
Type: defect| Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 19
Component: Test Day |Version:
Resolution:| Keywords:
Blocked By:
Compose started at Mon Mar 4 08:15:12 UTC 2013
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[HippoDraw]
HippoDraw-python-1.21.3-6.fc19.x86_64 requires
libboost_python.so.1.50.0()(64bit)
[condor]
condor-plumage-7.9.1-0.1.fc19.4.x86_64 requires
- Original Message -
> - Original Message -
> > Hey, Jaroslav - sorry I didn't catch this before, but can you edit
> > the
> > F19 QA schedule and move all the blocker review meetings to
> > Wednesdays?
> > We started doing the meetings on Wednesdays in the last cycle and
> > it
> >
#360: MariaDB test day for F19
---+---
Reporter: hhorak| Owner:
Type: defect| Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 19
Component: Test Day |Version:
Resolution:| Keywords:
Blocked By:
#360: MariaDB test day for F19
---+---
Reporter: hhorak| Owner:
Type: defect| Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 19
Component: Test Day |Version:
Resolution:| Keywords:
Blocked By:
#360: MariaDB test day for F19
---+---
Reporter: hhorak| Owner:
Type: defect| Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 19
Component: Test Day |Version:
Resolution:| Keywords:
Blocked By:
#360: MariaDB test day for F19
---+---
Reporter: hhorak| Owner:
Type: defect| Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 19
Component: Test Day |Version:
Resolution:| Keywords:
Blocked By:
#353: Fedora 19 test day for FreeIPA
---+---
Reporter: dpal | Owner:
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 19
Component: Test Day |Version:
Resolution:| Keywords:
Blocked By:
#355: System Certificates test day
---+---
Reporter: stefw | Owner:
Type: task | Status: closed
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 19
Component: Test Day |Version:
Resolution: fixed | Keywords:
Blocked By:
Frustrated by the lack of an operating telnet server in Fedora 18,
I installed the current rawhide 3.9 kernel onto Fedora 18 on a
test machine.
Results: operation appears normal. Wine still works.
Telnetd works properly.
mount.cifs fails with an invalid argument complaint,
just as with rawhide
not a good choice of app with which to 'test your
tablet'. Especially not the night before a meeting. For three hours solid.
This is a reminder of the upcoming QA meeting. Please add any topic
suggestions to the meeting wiki page:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Meetings/20130304
The c
24 matches
Mail list logo
