Re: manual disk configuration problems

On Fri, 2012-12-07 at 16:35 -0500, Claude Jones wrote: > What I'm trying to do: put F18 Beta on two drives > I want the first 250 GB drive to have /boot /swap and / > I want the second 2 TB drive to have /home > I'm making /boot ext2 and all the other partitions ext4 (I haven't kept > up with all

Re: Schedule, test days, and freeze

On Fri, 2012-12-07 at 14:53 -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 15:30:14 -0500, >Matthew Miller wrote: > >So, this: > > > > > >says the final change deadline is 2012-12-11 and it agrees with

Re: Schedule, test days, and freeze

On Fri, 2012-12-07 at 15:30 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > So, this: > > > says the final change deadline is 2012-12-11 and it agrees with > >

Re: why not a partition assignment mode? (Re: community etiquette (Re: Rename anaconda to cryptoconda?))

On Fri, 2012-12-07 at 17:42 -0600, Daniel Krawchuk wrote: > I consider myself a basic user and what Chris describes is what I do > every time I install the latest release on my laptop from the livecd, > a process that has always taken a couple of minutes of configuration > followed by however long

[Test-Announce] Fedora 18 Final Test Compose 1 (TC1) Available Now!

As per the Fedora 18 schedule [1], Fedora 18 Final Test Compose 1 (TC1) is now available for testing. Content information, including changes, can be found at https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5406 . Please see the following pages for download links (including delta ISOs) and testing instructi

Re: why not a partition assignment mode? (Re: community etiquette (Re: Rename anaconda to cryptoconda?))

I consider myself a basic user and what Chris describes is what I do every time I install the latest release on my laptop from the livecd, a process that has always taken a couple of minutes of configuration followed by however long copying the image took. I re-use my existing partitions, /, /h

Re: Prevent F18 anaconda from overwriting bootloader

On Fri, 2012-12-07 at 15:38 -0600, Ian Pilcher wrote: > As of "smoke 4" it looks like I am finally able to install Fedora 18 > onto a new LV within an existing VG (a VG built from 2 separate software > RAID devices no less)! > > I did this in a test VM, and I'm darn glad that I did, because it loo

Re: Prevent F18 anaconda from overwriting bootloader

On Dec 7, 2012, at 2:38 PM, Ian Pilcher wrote: > > How can I prevent anaconda from overwriting my existing bootloader? Freshly made. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=885240 -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/

Prevent F18 anaconda from overwriting bootloader

As of "smoke 4" it looks like I am finally able to install Fedora 18 onto a new LV within an existing VG (a VG built from 2 separate software RAID devices no less)! I did this in a test VM, and I'm darn glad that I did, because it looks like it would have trashed the existing (grub "legacy") bootl

manual disk configuration problems

What I'm trying to do: put F18 Beta on two drives I want the first 250 GB drive to have /boot /swap and / I want the second 2 TB drive to have /home I'm making /boot ext2 and all the other partitions ext4 (I haven't kept up with all the new filing systems, so maybe this is too backwards looking

Re: Reclaim disk space doesn't reuse existing swap, should it?

John Reiser wrote on Fri, 07 Dec 2012 07:30:50 -0800 >NO! NO! NO! Do NOT format any partition, including swap partitions, >except when explicitly requested. I want to share _some_ swap partitions, >but running mkswap destroys the UUID and/or label which other /etc/fstab >depend on. I still thi

Re: Schedule, test days, and freeze

On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 02:53:14PM -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > Blocker bugs can still be fixed after the 11th. > And after final is declared gold we still have a bit of time to get > zero day updates out. In the case of the FirewallD feature and its implications, zero day is too late. -- Mat

Re: Schedule, test days, and freeze

On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 15:30:14 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: So, this: says the final change deadline is 2012-12-11 and it agrees with Th

Re: Reclaim disk space doesn't reuse existing swap, should it?

On Dec 7, 2012, at 8:30 AM, John Reiser wrote: > NO! NO! NO! Do NOT format any partition, including swap partitions, > except when explicitly requested. I wish anaconda didn't force reformats to install, but it does and I think it's a problem. > That would be a change from past practice.

Schedule, test days, and freeze

So, this: says the final change deadline is 2012-12-11 and it agrees with The Test Days schedule

Re: systemd: Failed to initialize SELinux context: Permission denied

Daniel J Walsh wrote on 12/07/2012 14:40:55: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 12/07/2012 11:26 AM, john.flor...@dart.biz wrote: > > Daniel J Walsh wrote on 12/07/2012 10:46:11: > >> > >> On 12/07/2012 08:44 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > >>> On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 08:2

Re: Please help test packages!

On 12/05/12 22:59, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Wed, 05 Dec 2012 16:46:50 -1000, Erinn Looney-Triggs wrote: > >>> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Update_feedback_guidelines >>> >>> Thanks! >>> >> >> Well I never knew about that handy little tool. Thanks for pointing that >> out, knocked out a bun

Re: systemd: Failed to initialize SELinux context: Permission denied

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 12/07/2012 11:26 AM, john.flor...@dart.biz wrote: > Daniel J Walsh wrote on 12/07/2012 10:46:11: >> >> On 12/07/2012 08:44 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: >>> On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 08:22:10 -0500, john.flor...@dart.biz wrote: Thinking seli

Re: Manual Partitioning and LVM, Re: Puzzled

On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 15:36:29 -0500, Gene Czarcinski wrote: The problem turned out to be an "old" mobo with an enabled floppy interface with nothing attached. Disable the interface in the BIOS and things work. However, that should not have hung up the install. This issue sounds familia

Re: new criterion proposal: core kickstart commands

On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 11:08:27AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > > Initially I said that if commands need to change or go away, they should be > > marked deprecated for a release or two. Similarly, certain commands could be > > marked as Experimental (btrfs) or Unstable (autopart, say). > > Then,

Re: converting from Beta to Final release

On Fri, 2012-12-07 at 14:23 -0500, Claude Jones wrote: > Will full reinstall be required? I've got a fresh F18 install here and > I'm spending more time than I should on it, but, if it is going to be > possible to just convert it to final release, I'll keep going As always, no, if you keep yum u

converting from Beta to Final release

Will full reinstall be required? I've got a fresh F18 install here and I'm spending more time than I should on it, but, if it is going to be possible to just convert it to final release, I'll keep going -- Claude Jones Brunswick, MD, USA -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsub

Re: new criterion proposal: core kickstart commands

On Fri, 2012-12-07 at 13:11 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 07:27:58AM -0500, Kamil Paral wrote: > > Which brings me to another point. In kickstart there are commands which > > use a functionality we don't block the GUI on. For example there is a > > btrfs command, but until

Re: Canon printer/scanner driver installation problem Fedora 18 Beta

> > > # yum provides '*/libtiff.so.3' > > > > > > libtiff-compat-4.0.2-5.fc18 > > > > libtiff-compat is no longer included with later builds for Fedora 18. > > That query was running on rawhide so it looks like that in this moment > rawhide repos still provide it. Odd. It has been remo

Re: new criterion proposal: core kickstart commands

On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 07:27:58AM -0500, Kamil Paral wrote: > Which brings me to another point. In kickstart there are commands which > use a functionality we don't block the GUI on. For example there is a > btrfs command, but until recenly btrfs wasn't displayed in Anaconda GUI I've read but not

Re: Canon printer/scanner driver installation problem Fedora 18 Beta

On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 12:23:40PM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Thu, 6 Dec 2012 15:58:53 -0700, Michal Jaegermann wrote: > > > On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 01:22:52AM -0500, Joerg Lechner wrote: > > > > > > > > > Thank You for Your help. I found libpng12.so.0in the Rawhide > > > package (

Re: systemd: Failed to initialize SELinux context: Permission denied

Daniel J Walsh wrote on 12/07/2012 10:46:11: > > On 12/07/2012 08:44 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 08:22:10 -0500, john.flor...@dart.biz wrote: > >> > >> Thinking selinux might be preventing the relabel from happening (?!?) I > >> rebooted with selinux=0 so that I coul

Re: systemd: Failed to initialize SELinux context: Permission denied

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 12/07/2012 08:44 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 08:22:10 -0500, john.flor...@dart.biz wrote: >> >> Thinking selinux might be preventing the relabel from happening (?!?) I >> rebooted with selinux=0 so that I could reconfig /e

Re: Reclaim disk space doesn't reuse existing swap, should it?

On 12/07/2012 06:47 AM, Richard Ryniker wrote: > Probably not. There are too many possibilities to make reasonable any > default except "do what the user explicitly says is desired". Except that for many years installing has collected all discoverable swap partitions, and put them into /etc/fstab

Re: Reclaim disk space doesn't reuse existing swap, should it?

Probably not. There are too many possibilities to make reasonable any default except "do what the user explicitly says is desired". The usual problems are hot-swap devices (USB, ESATA, etc.) that may be present during installation but not later, and swap spaces intended for other operating system

F-18 Branched report: 20121207 changes

Compose started at Fri Dec 7 09:15:42 UTC 2012 New package: libnetfilter_cthelper-1.0.0-3.fc18 User-space infrastructure for connection tracking helpers New package: peervpn-0.029-1.fc18 A VPN software using full mesh network topology Updated Packages: NetworkM

Re: systemd: Failed to initialize SELinux context: Permission denied

On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 08:22:10 -0500, john.flor...@dart.biz wrote: Thinking selinux might be preventing the relabel from happening (?!?) I rebooted with selinux=0 so that I could reconfig /etc/sysconfig/selinux having SELINUX=permissive, touched /.autorelabel and rebooted again. This time I

Re: systemd: Failed to initialize SELinux context: Permission denied

Bruno Wolff III wrote on 12/06/2012 23:48:07: > On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 15:39:55 -0500, >john.flor...@dart.biz wrote: > > > >Yeah, if I was actually worried about security in this case, that would've > >been my usual approach. I had it turned off to bring greater visibility > >to other erro

Re: selinux-policy-3.11.1-57 and 3.11.1-58 breaking access to 'storage' drives

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 12/07/2012 01:46 AM, Ankur Sinha wrote: > On Mon, 2012-12-03 at 12:53 -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote: >> In bohdi, people have reported that -59 fixed the problem going forward. >> But people already affected need to relabel. > > Looks like I got cau

Re: Liberation 2.0 Vs Liberation 1.0 (Need comments)

> No worries. Simply yum update will revert this change. :) > Building liberation 1.07.2-11 with epoch for F18 Perfect, thanks Pravin. It's good to switch to a new technology, but just when it is really ready, not sooner. I'm very glad about the decision that was made. -- test mailing list test@

Re: new criterion proposal: core kickstart commands

> I agree with Matt. Kickstart is not only a lowest common denominator > it is > a critical functionality for tons of our testing and deployment > tools. We > don't want revolutionary change in kickstart and we definitely cannot > have > it be broken. Slow, gradual change properly documented is cri

Re: Liberation 2.0 Vs Liberation 1.0 (Need comments)

On 6 December 2012 17:52, Kamil Paral wrote: > > > If you do keep the current blurry fonts as default (god forbid), > > > please at least provide an easy way to switch to Fedora 17 > > > rendering > > > style. Thanks. > > > > > We all thought we need to wait for some more times for this feature.

Re: Canon printer/scanner driver installation problem Fedora 18 Beta

On Thu, 6 Dec 2012 15:58:53 -0700, Michal Jaegermann wrote: > On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 01:22:52AM -0500, Joerg Lechner wrote: > > > > > > Thank You for Your help. I found libpng12.so.0in the Rawhide > > package (libpng12-1.2.50-2.fc19.i686.rpm). For libtiff.so.3 so far I > > found nothing, >

Re: selinux-policy-3.11.1-57 and 3.11.1-58 breaking access to 'storage' drives

On Thu, 2012-12-06 at 23:38 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > Miroslav is asking us to try -60 now. Seems to have fixed the issue :) -- Thanks, Warm regards, Ankur: "FranciscoD" Please only print if necessary. Looking to contribute to Fedora? Look here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Jo

Re: selinux-policy-3.11.1-57 and 3.11.1-58 breaking access to 'storage' drives

On Thu, 2012-12-06 at 23:38 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > Miroslav is asking us to try -60 now. Updating in progress. Will relabel again, and report. -- Thanks, Warm regards, Ankur: "FranciscoD" Please only print if necessary. Looking to contribute to Fedora? Look here: https://fedoraproj