The following Fedora 16 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
22
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-17376/seamonkey-2.13.2-1.fc16
62
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-14452/bacula-5.0.3-33.fc16
0
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-
The following Fedora 17 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
22
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-17381/seamonkey-2.13.2-1.fc17
0
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-18748/android-tools-20121120git3ddc005-1.fc17
0
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/u
At the F18 Beta Go/No-Go Meeting that just occurred, it was
agreed to Go for the Fedora 18 Beta. It will be released on
Tuesday, November 27, 2012.
A massive thanks to everyone who was working hard on F18
Beta - so called "Exploding Turkey" - release and also
thanks for your patience.
Meeting
Hey folks. We just signed off on Beta (woo!), but we still need to push
the last few release blocker fixing updates stable. Can folks who have
successfully tested f17->f18 upgrades please karma:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-18606/fedup-0.7.1-1.fc18
https://admin.fedoraprojec
On Thu, 2012-11-22 at 11:03 -0700, Tim Flink wrote:
> The problem with our release validation process is where to draw the
> line between what we test and what we don't. Our test cases are pretty
> much human bash scripts and that seems to be what people expect. If
> you follow all the steps of a
On 11/22/2012 11:00 AM, Martin Krizek wrote:
Hi Tim,
Is this "...default partitioning (no less than 500MB for /boot), selecting the
default package set." really necessary? I'd say that a more valid use case
would be upgrading with any partitioning and any package set. I mean, who uses
just a def
On Thu, 22 Nov 2012 12:00:20 +0100
Martin Krizek wrote:
> Hi Tim,
>
> Is this "...default partitioning (no less than 500MB for /boot),
> selecting the default package set." really necessary? I'd say that a
> more valid use case would be upgrading with any partitioning and any
> package set. I me
Hi Tim,
Is this "...default partitioning (no less than 500MB for /boot), selecting the
default package set." really necessary? I'd say that a more valid use case
would be upgrading with any partitioning and any package set. I mean, who uses
just a default package set? Would it make sense to rem
On Tue, 2012-11-20 at 04:54 -0500, Josef Skladanka wrote:
> OK, I've replaced the testcases, incorporating your suggestions.
> At the end, I decided to go with the 'old style' encrypted install (basic
> autopart with enabled encryption).
>
> The testcases now are:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
