Re: Floppies available

No joke, wrong list. On 11/10/2012 05:45 PM, Carl G wrote: Is this a joke? 2012/11/10 Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R > I have a number of 5.25 and 3.5 inch floppies available. Claim them now before they become landfill. -- Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R c...

Re: How to interpret F18 Blocker criterion

This is starting to get off topic but: All of the critical accelerated drivers for Linux guests hosted by newer versions of VMware are in the main Linux and X.org distributions. The past few Fedora releases have included them. While Fedora may not officially support it, I have every Fedora vers

Re: How to interpret F18 Blocker criterion

On 2012-11-10 9:36, Josh Boyer wrote: 1) It's making something Fedora does not build, provide, or have any influence on part of our release process. Doubly so if you're going down the "test it using Windows or OS X as a host" route. I'm personally not thrilled at all about adding such dependen

Re: post install very slooow

On 2012-11-10 7:42, John Reiser wrote: I noticed the post install processing in f16 lasted only a few seconds, not the seemingly interminable wait a Fedora 18 install takes. If you have many partitions, then the grub2 operating system prober takes a while to construct grub.cfg: more than half a

Fedora 16 updates-testing report

The following Fedora 16 Security updates need testing: Age URL 10 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-17376/seamonkey-2.13.2-1.fc16 50 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-14452/bacula-5.0.3-33.fc16 10 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-

Fedora 17 updates-testing report

The following Fedora 17 Security updates need testing: Age URL 10 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-17381/seamonkey-2.13.2-1.fc17 10 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-17385/kdelibs-4.9.2-11.fc17 1 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012

Re: Floppies available

Is this a joke? 2012/11/10 Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R > I have a number of 5.25 and 3.5 inch floppies available. > Claim them now before they become landfill. > > -- > Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R c...@omen.com www.omen.com > Developer of Industrial ZMODEM(Tm) for Embedded Applications >

Floppies available

I have a number of 5.25 and 3.5 inch floppies available. Claim them now before they become landfill. -- Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R c...@omen.com www.omen.com Developer of Industrial ZMODEM(Tm) for Embedded Applications Omen Technology Inc "The High Reliability Software" 10255 NW Ol

[Test-Announce] Fedora 18 Beta Test Compose 8 (TC8) Available Now!

*IMPORTANT*: Both TC8 install DVDs are oversized and will not fit on single-layer DVDs. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DVD#Capacity for DVD size limits. As per the Fedora 18 schedule [1], Fedora 18 Beta Test Compose 8 (TC8) is now available for testing. Content information, including changes, c

Re: post install very slooow

>> If you have many partitions, then the grub2 operating system prober >> takes a while to construct grub.cfg: more than half a minute for my >> three dozen partitions. This is new with grub2 instead of grub. > Is there a bug for this? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=875356 -- --

Re: post install very slooow

> 36 partitions? Really? I thought GPT's 128+ partitions is actually an inside > joke, ergo "you know if we give users this particular hurt me button, some > will actually try it." 45 partitions across 4 drives in one box, 40 partitions across 4 drives in another. Several OS, several distros, m

Re: How to interpret F18 Blocker criterion

On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 7:17 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Fri, 2012-11-09 at 16:14 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: >> On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 3:49 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" >> wrote: >> > On 11/09/2012 08:34 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: >> >> >> >> Maybe you're talking about running Fedora as a vbox or vmwa

Re: test days & smolt retirement

On Sat, 10 Nov 2012 06:42:39 + "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > On 11/10/2012 06:17 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > (It's mentioned on the wiki page link I specifically pointed at in > > the email too) > > I skimmed over the announcement went to the mailing list so no > activity so how about ment

Re: post install very slooow

On Nov 10, 2012, at 4:42 PM, John Reiser wrote: >>> I noticed the post install processing in f16 lasted only >>> a few seconds, not the seemingly interminable wait >>> a Fedora 18 install takes. > > If you have many partitions, then the grub2 operating system prober > takes a while to construct

Re: How to interpret F18 Blocker criterion

On 11/09/2012 08:17 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: Well those numbers show clear dominance in vbox and vmware on the virtualzation field amongs those users that reported their smolt data so I dont think we can ignore those numbers just like that. Really? If you're installing a virtual machi

Re: post install very slooow

On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 07:42:51AM -0800, John Reiser wrote: > If you have many partitions, then the grub2 operating system prober > takes a while to construct grub.cfg: more than half a minute for my > three dozen partitions. This is new with grub2 instead of grub. Is there a bug for this? --

Re: post install very slooow

>> I noticed the post install processing in f16 lasted only >> a few seconds, not the seemingly interminable wait >> a Fedora 18 install takes. If you have many partitions, then the grub2 operating system prober takes a while to construct grub.cfg: more than half a minute for my three dozen partit

Re: How to interpret F18 Blocker criterion

On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 3:29 PM, drago01 wrote: > On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 5:14 AM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" > wrote: >> On 11/10/2012 12:39 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: >>> >>> I think there's still some host/guest confusion going on, possibly. >> >> >> I was refereeing to Fedora as an guest in vmwa

Re: How to interpret F18 Blocker criterion

On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 5:14 AM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > On 11/10/2012 12:39 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: >> >> I think there's still some host/guest confusion going on, possibly. > > > I was refereeing to Fedora as an guest in vmware,vbox,hyperv not as an host > which is in context with th

F-18 Branched report: 20121110 changes

Compose started at Sat Nov 10 09:15:51 UTC 2012 Broken deps for x86_64 -- [dhcp-forwarder] dhcp-forwarder-upstart-0.10-1801.fc18.noarch requires /sbin/initctl [dvipdfm] dvipdfm-0.13.2d-44.fc18.x86_64 requires libkpathsea.so.4(

Re: Rawhide /etc/grub2.cfg KEYTABLE SYSFONT

On Sat, 10 Nov 2012 02:27:48 -0800 (PST) Sergio wrote: > > -- > > Have you fixed /etc/default/grub ? Yes, all the obvious things seem to be done. -- Regards, Frank -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: Rawhide /etc/grub2.cfg KEYTABLE SYSFONT

--- Em sáb, 10/11/12, Frank Murphy escreveu: > De: Frank Murphy > Assunto: Rawhide /etc/grub2.cfg KEYTABLE SYSFONT > Para: test@lists.fedoraproject.org > Data: Sábado, 10 de Novembro de 2012, 6:45 > After each kernel update, > KEYTABLE, SYSFONT > re-appear on the kernel line. > > This box ha

Rawhide /etc/grub2.cfg KEYTABLE SYSFONT

After each kernel update, KEYTABLE, SYSFONT re-appear on the kernel line. This box has been yum-updated F16>F17(Rawhide)>F18>Rawhide>F19-Rawhide So what do I extra manual steps to remove "old Stuff" from the system. Fully updated using, kernel-nodebug.repo Xfce -- Regards, Frank -- test maili