On 11/04/2012 04:39 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-11-04 at 03:29 +0100, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
>> On 11/04/2012 02:50 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>>> On Sun, 2012-11-04 at 02:36 +0100, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
>>>
Also what does this mean for UEFI installations with Fedora
On Sun, 2012-11-04 at 03:29 +0100, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
> On 11/04/2012 02:50 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Sun, 2012-11-04 at 02:36 +0100, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
> >
> >> Also what does this mean for UEFI installations with Fedora? When I install
> >> F18 will it detect that the
On Nov 3, 2012, at 17:03, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> Bad news:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=759303
>
> Jesse, any chance you're going to change your mind here? :)
Not for F18.
- jlk
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedorapr
On Sat, 2012-11-03 at 19:33 -0700, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
> Please describe how to install Fedora 18 on a specified existing partition
> without affecting any other partitions (other than swap).
Boot the installer, go to custom partitioning, pick the partition you
want to use, set it
On 11/03/2012 07:22 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sat, 2012-11-03 at 22:16 -0400, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
On 11/03/2012 06:27 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Nov 3, 2012, at 7:57 PM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
The bad news: Anaconda 18.24 (approx) could not
deal with a non empty HD. I tr
On 11/04/2012 02:50 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-11-04 at 02:36 +0100, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
>
>> Also what does this mean for UEFI installations with Fedora? When I install
>> F18 will it detect that the UEFI bits already exists on the harddisk and
>> overwrite only the binary
On Sat, 2012-11-03 at 22:16 -0400, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
> On 11/03/2012 06:27 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> >
> > On Nov 3, 2012, at 7:57 PM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R
> > wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> The bad news: Anaconda 18.24 (approx) could not
> >> deal with a non empty HD. I tried a number of th
On 11/03/2012 06:27 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Nov 3, 2012, at 7:57 PM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
The bad news: Anaconda 18.24 (approx) could not
deal with a non empty HD. I tried a number of things
to no avail. Eventually I zeroed out the HD with fdisk
and rebooted the installer
The following Fedora 16 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
3
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-17376/seamonkey-2.13.2-1.fc16
43
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-14452/bacula-5.0.3-33.fc16
3
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-
The following Fedora 17 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
3
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-17381/seamonkey-2.13.2-1.fc17
3
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-17385/kdelibs-4.9.2-11.fc17
1
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012
On Sun, 2012-11-04 at 02:36 +0100, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
> Also what does this mean for UEFI installations with Fedora? When I install
> F18 will it detect that the UEFI bits already exists on the harddisk and
> overwrite only the binary bits and only add the new install to the grub menu?
On 11/04/2012 01:03 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-11-04 at 00:53 +0100, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
>> On 11/04/2012 12:10 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>>>
>>> On Nov 3, 2012, at 10:10 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>>>
I don't know, though, if it's actually been implemented yet, or if it
On Sat, 2012-11-03 at 20:30 -0400, Richard Ryniker wrote:
> >we should make this possible via a command line parameter rather than a UI
> >option; it's an 'advanced' option that's only of use to multiboot
> >pokemoners (you know...gotta catch 'em all) and is a 'dangerous' option
> >for anyone who d
>we should make this possible via a command line parameter rather than a UI
>option; it's an 'advanced' option that's only of use to multiboot
>pokemoners (you know...gotta catch 'em all) and is a 'dangerous' option
>for anyone who doesn't understand it - if you pick it when you don't know
>what yo
On Sun, 2012-11-04 at 00:10 +0100, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Nov 3, 2012, at 10:10 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> > I don't know, though, if it's actually been implemented yet, or if it's
> > still on someone's todo list. I couldn't find anything in the git log
> > for it, but I may have missed it
On Nov 4, 2012, at 12:53 AM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn
wrote:
> What I would like to see is proper support for UEFI multiboot. Right now
> installing a new Fedora next to the live one is difficult since it doesn't
> support creating individual UEFI boot entried for each installation but
> only a gl
On Sun, 2012-11-04 at 00:46 +0100, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
> On 11/03/2012 05:33 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Sat, 2012-11-03 at 17:28 +0100, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
> >> On 11/03/2012 05:03 PM, Erik P. Olsen wrote:
> >>> On 03/11/12 12:30, Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> On Nov 3,
On Sun, 2012-11-04 at 00:53 +0100, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
> On 11/04/2012 12:10 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> >
> > On Nov 3, 2012, at 10:10 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> >
> >> I don't know, though, if it's actually been implemented yet, or if it's
> >> still on someone's todo list. I couldn't
On 11/04/2012 12:10 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> On Nov 3, 2012, at 10:10 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
>> I don't know, though, if it's actually been implemented yet, or if it's
>> still on someone's todo list. I couldn't find anything in the git log
>> for it, but I may have missed it. I've adde
On 11/03/2012 05:33 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-11-03 at 17:28 +0100, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
>> On 11/03/2012 05:03 PM, Erik P. Olsen wrote:
>>> On 03/11/12 12:30, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Nov 3, 2012, at 11:14 AM, Erik P. Olsen wrote:
> I installed T7 on a vbo
On Nov 3, 2012, at 10:10 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> I don't know, though, if it's actually been implemented yet, or if it's
> still on someone's todo list. I couldn't find anything in the git log
> for it, but I may have missed it. I've added bcl and dlehman to the bug
> and asked them to comm
On Nov 3, 2012, at 7:57 PM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
>
>
> The bad news: Anaconda 18.24 (approx) could not
> deal with a non empty HD. I tried a number of things
> to no avail. Eventually I zeroed out the HD with fdisk
> and rebooted the installer.
Did you file a bug?
>
> The re
Hey, folks. There appears to be a confirmed bug breaking installs in
many (maybe all) non-English installs of Beta TC7:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872791
this is likely related to various patches that went into TC7 to improve
language selection. The anaconda devs will get on it A
On Sat, 2012-11-03 at 19:42 +, Ron Yorston wrote:
> I tried to install using the F18 Beta TC7 Live CD, but couldn't find
> any way to specify that the bootloader should go onto the root
> partition rather than the MBR. Is this possible? It used to be.
>
> I see someone has already raised a b
I tried to install using the F18 Beta TC7 Live CD, but couldn't find
any way to specify that the bootloader should go onto the root
partition rather than the MBR. Is this possible? It used to be.
I see someone has already raised a bug report:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=87282
The following Fedora 18 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-16383/libproxy-0.4.10-1.fc18
25
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-15716/libxslt-1.1.27-2.fc18
2
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-
Installed TC7 via net install on my office machine,
a Gigabyte ga-p55a-ud3 with Core I5 and 8GB ram.
A bit of good news: the time zone setting worked.
The bad news: Anaconda 18.24 (approx) could not
deal with a non empty HD. I tried a number of things
to no avail. Eventually I zeroed out the H
On Sat, 2012-11-03 at 17:28 +0100, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
> On 11/03/2012 05:03 PM, Erik P. Olsen wrote:
> > On 03/11/12 12:30, Chris Murphy wrote:
> >>
> >> On Nov 3, 2012, at 11:14 AM, Erik P. Olsen wrote:
> >>
> >>> I installed T7 on a vbox virtual machine. However, it aborts almost at
>
On 11/03/2012 05:03 PM, Erik P. Olsen wrote:
> On 03/11/12 12:30, Chris Murphy wrote:
>>
>> On Nov 3, 2012, at 11:14 AM, Erik P. Olsen wrote:
>>
>>> I installed T7 on a vbox virtual machine. However, it aborts almost at
>>> the end of installation. Don't know why. Attempted a new installation
>>>
On 03/11/12 11:14, Erik P. Olsen wrote:
I installed T7 on a vbox virtual machine. However, it aborts almost at the end
of installation. Don't know why. Attempted a new installation but it would not
allow reclaim of disk space.
I have created a new thread for the abort problem.
--
Erik
Concordi
Installing an F18 xfce system using the beta T7 system (netinst) aborts at post
installation tasks. The allotted disc space gets filled up causing the crash.
Tried with 12 GB and 16 GB, same crash.
Gnome based system installs correctly (with regard to this problem).
--
Erik
Concordia parvæ re
On 03/11/12 12:30, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Nov 3, 2012, at 11:14 AM, Erik P. Olsen wrote:
I installed T7 on a vbox virtual machine. However, it aborts almost at the end
of installation. Don't know why. Attempted a new installation but it would not
allow reclaim of disk space.
What version
Compose started at Sat Nov 3 09:15:19 UTC 2012
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[dhcp-forwarder]
dhcp-forwarder-upstart-0.10-1801.fc18.noarch requires /sbin/initctl
[dnf]
dnf-0.2.14-2.git4831982.fc18.noarch requires python-hawkey >=
On Nov 3, 2012, at 11:14 AM, Erik P. Olsen wrote:
> I installed T7 on a vbox virtual machine. However, it aborts almost at the
> end of installation. Don't know why. Attempted a new installation but it
> would not allow reclaim of disk space.
What version of anaconda is in TC7? I'm seeing 18.
With F18 I cannot get X working on a 27" imac (2011). The machine has an
ATI Radeon HD 6900M series listed as VGA controller and a Intel device
(from Z68 Express chipset) listed as Display controller.
With F17 X just worked fine using the ATI but with F18 I cannot get X to
work. I tried blacklist
I installed T7 on a vbox virtual machine. However, it aborts almost at the end
of installation. Don't know why. Attempted a new installation but it would not
allow reclaim of disk space.
--
Erik
Concordia parvæ res crescunt discordia maximæ dilabuntur
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproj
36 matches
Mail list logo
