While the last conversation around the F18 release criteria did yeild
some interesting information, it wasn't quite what I had in mind so
let's try this again :)
With all of the criteria changes we've had for F18, we'd like to get
some feedback on the current criteria to make sure that we're not
e
# F18 Beta Blocker Review meeting #5
# Date: 2012-10-24
# Time: 16:00 UTC [1] (12:00 EDT, 09:00 PDT)
# Location: #fedora-qa on irc.freenode.net
Keeping with what we've done for the last couple of weeks, we're
planning to stop around the 3 hour mark if we're not done by then and
resume on 2012-10-2
Time for another bumper meeting recap. I should stop sucking and do less
of these!
As always, minutes and IRC transcript available on the wiki at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Meetings/20121008 ,
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Meetings/20121015 and
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Meetings
The following Fedora 16 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
5
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-16421/drupal7-7.16-1.fc16
107
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-10402/bcfg2-1.2.3-1.fc16
32
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-14452/
The following Fedora 17 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
5
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-16442/drupal7-7.16-1.fc17
107
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-10391/bcfg2-1.2.3-1.fc17
5
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-16440/
On Wed, 2012-09-26 at 11:57 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote:
> > Reviving this discussion from August to make a decision on what we're
> > going to do about the mediacheck release criterion
> >
> > The current criterion reads:
> >
> > If there is an embedded checksum on any release medium, it must be
>
On 10/23/2012 09:35 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
I'm still hoping we can hold the Beta until fedup is working acceptably,
but some people are getting itchy feet since we've delayed the freeze
twice already. FESCo is still discussing it in that very ticket.
Delaying the release is better then deli
On Tue, 2012-10-23 at 22:20 +0100, Frank Murphy wrote:
> Seeing all the "obsolete" upgrade tests for Fedora 17 to 18
>
> and having looked at
> https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/946
>
> Will Fedora 17 be fedup with F18?
> Will beta be yummy?
I'm still hoping we can hold the Beta until fedup
Seeing all the "obsolete" upgrade tests for Fedora 17 to 18
and having looked at
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/946
Will Fedora 17 be fedup with F18?
Will beta be yummy?
--
Regards,
Frank
"Jack of all, fubars"
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admi
The following Fedora 18 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
5
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-16383/libproxy-0.4.10-1.fc18
14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-15716/libxslt-1.1.27-2.fc18
4
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-
On Tue, 23 Oct 2012 11:36:43 -0400 (EDT)
Kamil Paral wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > since all the upgrade testcases are basically 'obsolete', as we are
> > still waiting for FedUP, and Anaconda does not have any means of
> > upgrading installed system, I created a new sub-category of
> > 'Currently Unsu
On Tue, 23 Oct 2012 10:56:34 -0400
Josh Boyer wrote:
...snip...
> >
> > - It actually doesn't work fine. ;) From time to time it's prone to
> > rejecting new pastes with a "Sorry, you broke our server". This
> > confuses especially new folks.
>
> OK, I have seen that. It is definitely irri
> Hi,
>
> since all the upgrade testcases are basically 'obsolete', as we are
> still waiting for FedUP, and Anaconda does not have any means of
> upgrading installed system, I created a new sub-category of
> 'Currently Unsupported Testcases' in the General Tests subsection of
> https://fedoraproj
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 10:51 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Oct 2012 08:48:21 -0400
> Josh Boyer wrote:
>
>> Maybe I missed this somewhere, but why is fpaste being replaced to
>> begin with? It's been working fine for a really long time. I guess
>> I don't see the benefit of replacing it
On Tue, 23 Oct 2012 08:48:21 -0400
Josh Boyer wrote:
> Maybe I missed this somewhere, but why is fpaste being replaced to
> begin with? It's been working fine for a really long time. I guess
> I don't see the benefit of replacing it with something that doesn't
> actually replace it.
Well, a va
Hi,
since all the upgrade testcases are basically 'obsolete', as we are still
waiting for FedUP, and Anaconda does not have any means of upgrading installed
system, I created a new sub-category of 'Currently Unsupported Testcases' in
the General Tests subsection of
https://fedoraproject.org/wi
On 10/23/2012 05:54 AM, Andre Robatino wrote:
> Karel Volný redhat.com> writes:
>
>> why doesn't yum say
>> "Warning: Group virtualization has all packages installed.
>> Nothing to do"
>
> The corresponding message for a single package looks like
>
> Package virt-manager-0.9.4-1.fc17.noarch al
Karel Volný redhat.com> writes:
> why doesn't yum say
> "Warning: Group virtualization has all packages installed.
> Nothing to do"
The corresponding message for a single package looks like
Package virt-manager-0.9.4-1.fc17.noarch already installed and latest version
Nothing to do
Something a
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 8:28 AM, Athmane Madjoudj
wrote:
> On 10/23/2012 01:33 AM, Ankur Sinha wrote:
>> On Mon, 2012-10-22 at 17:05 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>>>
>>> Unless I'm missing something, this new system has no provision for
>>> viewing expired pastes. It doesn't even let you know you
Hi,
On 10/23/2012 01:33 AM, Ankur Sinha wrote:
On Mon, 2012-10-22 at 17:05 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
Unless I'm missing something, this new system has no provision for
viewing expired pastes. It doesn't even let you know you're trying to
view an expired paste, it just claims it doesn't exis
Compose started at Tue Oct 23 09:15:30 UTC 2012
Compose finished at Tue Oct 23 12:07:10 UTC 2012
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Dne Út 23. října 2012 07:46:07, Matthew Miller napsal(a):
> On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 05:56:53PM +0200, Karel Volný wrote:
> > then I see it like a good RFE material ...
> >
> > why doesn't yum say
> > "Warning: Group virtualization has all packages installed.
> > Nothing to do"
>
> "Warning! Everyth
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 05:56:53PM +0200, Karel Volný wrote:
> then I see it like a good RFE material ...
>
> why doesn't yum say
> "Warning: Group virtualization has all packages installed.
> Nothing to do"
"Warning! Everything is fine!" ?
--
Matthew Miller ☁☁☁ Fedora Cloud Architect ☁☁☁
23 matches
Mail list logo
