Hi folks,
Infra recently set up a sticky notes server for us. It's in staging
currently[1]. I've patched fpaste temporarily to point to our sticky
server rather than fpaste.org.
The builds are in updates-testing[2]. Please test the fpaste client (and
the sticky server in the process).
Please n
On Oct 18, 2012, at 4:03 PM, Antonio Olivares wrote:
>
> Now I have to change the line in grub via grub interactively and see that it
> fixes it and make a change somewhere so that subsequent kernel upgrades
> update correctly and not put '/dev/root' in there.
It would be good to track this do
Hey, folks. Just to notify the list that I updated a few validation test
cases for newUI, the interactive repository test cases:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_install_repository_HTTP/FTP_graphical
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_install_repository_Mirrorlist_graphical
https
On Thu, 2012-10-18 at 10:25 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote:
> I have started a review of all our test cases, I'll announce here if I do
> some large scale changes so people can peer review if they want.
>
> The first change is in Testcase_Mediakit_ISO_Size:
> https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title
The following Fedora 16 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
0
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-16421/drupal7-7.16-1.fc16
102
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-10402/bcfg2-1.2.3-1.fc16
26
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-14452/
The following Fedora 17 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
0
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-16442/drupal7-7.16-1.fc17
102
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-10391/bcfg2-1.2.3-1.fc17
74
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-11485/
> By the way, cannot find /dev/root is almost certainly a bootloader
> problem - the kernel parameter line may have the wrong root= buried in
> it, so dracut isn't finding a rootfs to read or mount and thus it pukes
> after it's consumed everything it can in the initramfs.
>
> --
Thank you sir!
#321: Some bugs that have fixes in updates-testing don't show it in the
'Updates'
column
--+-
Reporter: adamwill | Owner: tflink
Type: defect| Status: new
Priority: minor
On Oct 18, 2012, at 2:34 PM, Antonio Olivares wrote:
> Other people post pictures and they get approved.
They're much smaller, and even this surprises me. Of the 2-3 dozen list serves
I'm on, attachments are usually stripped without any notification or approval
process.
> Why is this a big d
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 12:34:06PM -0800, Antonio Olivares wrote:
> Other people post pictures and they get approved. Why is this a big deal?
It's the size. This list has thousands of subscribers, so when you send an
image that is megabytes in size, it generates gigabytes of traffic. I know
that
> -Original Message-
> From: li...@colorremedies.com
> Sent: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 14:11:53 -0600
> To: test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Subject: Re: removing the non booting kernels how do I troubleshoot them?
>
>
> On Oct 18, 2012, at 1:24 PM, Antonio Olivares wrote:
>>
>> I have sent a mes
On Oct 18, 2012, at 1:24 PM, Antonio Olivares wrote:
>
> I have sent a message with a picture of the debugging.
> The pictures are too big and are awaiting approval:
I think if you're sending 1.2MB files to a list serve, it's close to your first
day at the rodeo. Please don't do that. Paste i
> -Original Message-
> From: li...@colorremedies.com
> Sent: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 13:15:00 -0600
> To: test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Subject: Re: removing the non booting kernels how do I troubleshoot them?
>
>
> On Oct 18, 2012, at 11:29 AM, Antonio Olivares wrote:
>>
>> I have installed
On Oct 18, 2012, at 11:29 AM, Antonio Olivares wrote:
>
> I have installed the 3.6.1 and 3.6.2 kernels but they all fail at the same
> place. They just don't boot. I have yum erased them to have a booting
> kernel. The only one that boots.
>
> I have lspci from machine in case if its useful
> -Original Message-
> From: wingat...@inbox.com
> Sent: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 09:20:38 -0800
> To: test@lists.fedoraproject.org, test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Subject: Re: removing the non booting kernels how do I troubleshoot them?
>
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: li...@color
> From: Antonio Olivares
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: li...@colorremedies.com
> > Sent: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 13:02:03 -0600
> > To: test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > Subject: Re: removing the non booting kernels how do I troubleshoot
them?
> >
> >
> > On Oct 10, 2012, at 12:07 PM, Ant
> -Original Message-
> From: li...@colorremedies.com
> Sent: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 13:02:03 -0600
> To: test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Subject: Re: removing the non booting kernels how do I troubleshoot them?
>
>
> On Oct 10, 2012, at 12:07 PM, Antonio Olivares wrote:
>>>
>>
>> I get dracu
#308: Request for Fedora Networking Test Week
---+--
Reporter: martix| Owner: martix
Type: task | Status: assigned
Priority: major | Milestone:
Component: Test Day |Version:
Resolution:| Keywords:
Blo
The "smoke" anaconda HD setup showed signs of life
but in the end I had to wipe the HD with fdisk before
I could install.
The netinst install stalled on policycoreutils.
The DVD install worked.
I left Fedora running with WSPR and audacity active.
When I returned Noveau had freaked out again.
I a
I have started a review of all our test cases, I'll announce here if I do some
large scale changes so people can peer review if they want.
The first change is in Testcase_Mediakit_ISO_Size:
https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=QA%3ATestcase_Mediakit_ISO_Size&diff=307584&oldid=300485
I als
Compose started at Thu Oct 18 09:15:36 UTC 2012
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[almanah]
almanah-0.8.0-7.fc18.x86_64 requires libedataserverui-3.0.so.3()(64bit)
almanah-0.8.0-7.fc18.x86_64 requires libedataserver-1.2.so.16()(64bit)
#320: KDE4.9 Test Day
---+---
Reporter: benesv| Owner:
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 18
Component: Test Day |Version:
Resolution:| Keywords:
Blocked By:| B
#319: GNOME3.6 test day
---+---
Reporter: benesv| Owner:
Type: proventester request | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 18
Component: Test Day |Version:
Res
#320: KDE4.9 Test Day
--+
Reporter: benesv| Owner:
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 18
Component: Test Day | Version:
Keywords:| Blocked By:
Blocking:|
#319: GNOME3.6 test day
--+
Reporter: benesv| Owner:
Type: proventester request | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 18
Component: Test Day | Version:
Ke
Today I updated system for see new driver and also waiting for upstream
wifi driver. After update I did I just close all apps restart system then I
have really slow system.
I made it bug anda here is ;
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=867796
My Hardware :
Monster Notebook
Fe
26 matches
Mail list logo
