On Wed, 2012-09-19 at 23:35 -0700, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
> The MATE desktop web site has install packages to add
> MATE to Fedora 16 or 17. Lo and behold and deja vu,
> there it is, legacy Gnome 2 desktop.
>
> I tried compiz but that didn't work.
>
> That said, I think I've become
On Thu, 2012-09-20 at 05:46 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote:
> > Btw do we archive ( move ) those wiki pages somewhere under the QA
> > namespace when they are deprecated?
>
> Good question. I don't know. I added a warning box to the page and
> removed it from the test matrix skeleton, that should work.
On Thu, 2012-09-20 at 05:05 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote:
> > > Last but not least, we should consider removing
> > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Anaconda_traceback_debug_mode
> > > because I don't see how that helps our users. That is mainly useful
> > > for developers, but no user wil
On Thu, 2012-09-20 at 12:26 -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Stephen John Smoogen said:
> > On 20 September 2012 10:12, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R
> > wrote:
> > > yum update is up to rc6 on the kernel, but
> > >
> > > mirrors1.kernel.org::fedora/development/18/x86_64/os
> > >
>
On Sep 20, 2012, at 6:41 AM, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
> OK, I can see that a lot more needs to be done ... especially with anaconda.
> Right now I see little if any advantage to the new anaconda and sure hope
> that there is a lot more work to do.
There is. It had to be frozen to get alpha out
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 1:26 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
> Looking into it more though, the problem appears to be that you are
> looking in the wrong place. I have kernel-3.6.0-0.rc6.git0.2.fc18 in
> updates/testing/18, not development/18 (which IIRC is normal
> post-Alpha). My mirror synced that a c
Once upon a time, Stephen John Smoogen said:
> On 20 September 2012 10:12, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R
> wrote:
> > yum update is up to rc6 on the kernel, but
> >
> > mirrors1.kernel.org::fedora/development/18/x86_64/os
> >
> > is only at rc2. When will the development tree be updated?
>
>
On 20 September 2012 10:12, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
> yum update is up to rc6 on the kernel, but
>
> mirrors1.kernel.org::fedora/development/18/x86_64/os
>
> is only at rc2. When will the development tree be updated?
mirroring is a pull technology not a push technology. EG we can
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 09:12:26AM -0700, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
> yum update is up to rc6 on the kernel, but
> mirrors1.kernel.org::fedora/development/18/x86_64/os
> is only at rc2. When will the development tree be updated?
Syncing out the alpha is probably delaying things at so
yum update is up to rc6 on the kernel, but
mirrors1.kernel.org::fedora/development/18/x86_64/os
is only at rc2. When will the development tree be updated?
--
Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R c...@omen.com www.omen.com
Developer of Industrial ZMODEM(Tm) for Embedded Applications
Omen Tec
On 20/09/12 17:08, drago01 wrote:
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 5:47 PM, Frank Murphy wrote:
What app does New-Anaconda use to set the keyboard?
Not sure what you mean by "app" it does have its own keyboard layout
dialog (see pyanaconda/ui/gui/spokes/keyboard.py /
pyanaconda/ui/gui/spokes/keyboard
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 5:47 PM, Frank Murphy wrote:
> What app does New-Anaconda use to set the keyboard?
Not sure what you mean by "app" it does have its own keyboard layout
dialog (see pyanaconda/ui/gui/spokes/keyboard.py /
pyanaconda/ui/gui/spokes/keyboard.glade in the anaconda sources).
--
What app does New-Anaconda use to set the keyboard?
--
Regards,
Frank
"Jack of all, fubars"
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
On 20/09/12 16:04, David Lehman wrote:
On Thu, 2012-09-20 at 15:59 +0100, Frank Murphy wrote:
On 20/09/12 15:28, Joachim Backes wrote:
Hi testers,
I tried to install f18 alpha (inside VirtualBox) using a prepartitioned
disk (12 GB). During partitioning, I selected the review/customize
toggle b
On Thu, 2012-09-20 at 15:59 +0100, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On 20/09/12 15:28, Joachim Backes wrote:
> > Hi testers,
> >
> > I tried to install f18 alpha (inside VirtualBox) using a prepartitioned
> > disk (12 GB). During partitioning, I selected the review/customize
> > toggle button.
> >
>
> Where
On Thu, 2012-09-20 at 16:28 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote:
> Hi testers,
>
> I tried to install f18 alpha (inside VirtualBox) using a prepartitioned
> disk (12 GB). During partitioning, I selected the review/customize
> toggle button.
>
> The upcoming dialog presents two possibilities: "New Fedora
On 20/09/12 15:28, Joachim Backes wrote:
Hi testers,
I tried to install f18 alpha (inside VirtualBox) using a prepartitioned
disk (12 GB). During partitioning, I selected the review/customize
toggle button.
Where is the review/customize button?
--
Regards,
Frank
"Jack of all, fubars"
--
tes
Hi testers,
I tried to install f18 alpha (inside VirtualBox) using a prepartitioned
disk (12 GB). During partitioning, I selected the review/customize
toggle button.
The upcoming dialog presents two possibilities: "New Fedora 18-Alpha
Installation" and "Unknown".
Problem: If selecting "unknown"
OK, I can see that a lot more needs to be done ... especially with
anaconda. Right now I see little if any advantage to the new anaconda
and sure hope that there is a lot more work to do.
Options of permitting the user choices in NIC selection and
configuration, choice in Disk partition layou
Compose started at Thu Sep 20 08:15:06 UTC 2012
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[almanah]
almanah-0.8.0-7.fc18.x86_64 requires libedataserverui-3.0.so.3()(64bit)
almanah-0.8.0-7.fc18.x86_64 requires libedataserver-1.2.so.16()(64bit)
> Btw do we archive ( move ) those wiki pages somewhere under the QA
> namespace when they are deprecated?
Good question. I don't know. I added a warning box to the page and removed it
from the test matrix skeleton, that should work. It's still reachable through
categories.
--
test mailing list
On 09/20/2012 04:32 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>Last but not least, we should consider removing
>https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Anaconda_traceback_debug_mode
>because I don't see how that helps our users. That is mainly useful
>for developers, but no user will ever use that, they will
> > > Last but not least, we should consider removing
> > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Anaconda_traceback_debug_mode
> > > because I don't see how that helps our users. That is mainly
> > > useful
> > > for developers, but no user will ever use that, they will use
> > > updates.img
> > I have updated our test case with the new instructions:
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Anaconda_save_traceback_to_bugzilla
> >
> >
> > We have more test cases regarding bug reporting from Anaconda:
> >
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Anaconda_save_traceback_to_
#289: Howto: debug kernel
-+
Reporter: kparal | Owner:
Type: task| Status: closed
Priority: major | Milestone:
Component: Wiki|Version:
Resolution: fixed | Keywords:
Blocked By: | Blocking:
On Wed, 2012-09-19 at 21:32 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> > Last but not least, we should consider removing
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Anaconda_traceback_debug_mode
> > because I don't see how that helps our users. That is mainly useful
> > for developers, but no user will
26 matches
Mail list logo
