On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 2:59 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> * Any component which prominently identifies a Fedora release version
> number or phase (Alpha, Beta, Final) must do so correctly
>
With the changes in anaconda UI, this criteria makes alot of sense to
prevent confusion regarding version n
On 08/28/2012 09:29 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
Sorry for the essay, hope it all makes sense! Comments, suggestions,
improvements, complaints welcome.
"Design team considers KDE SIG responsible for that, it's not part of
the 'official' artwork stuff. So basically, we're down to bootloaders
It makes a lot of sense and I think this is a need delinataion
On Aug 28, 2012 5:34 PM, "Kevin Fenzi" wrote:
> I like it, makes sense. +1.
>
> kevin
>
> --
> test mailing list
> test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
>
--
test maili
The following Fedora 16 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
53
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-10314/revelation-0.4.14-1.fc16
7
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-12367/keepalived-1.2.3-2.fc16
7
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2
The following Fedora 17 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
7
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-12377/keepalived-1.2.5-2.fc17
54
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-10269/revelation-0.4.14-1.fc17
7
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2
I like it, makes sense. +1.
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Hey, folks. So discussion around
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=849982 rather indicates that
our existing release criteria relating to artwork are problematic. I
talked to the design team on IRC this morning, looking at the criteria
in their initial context (see
http://meetbot.fed
Adam,
All of these look good to me
On Aug 28, 2012 3:52 PM, "Adam Williamson" wrote:
> On 2012-08-21 18:10, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
>> Hey, folks. As discussed a couple of weeks back, I've always believed
>> the boot.iso, DVD and live boot method test cases ought to test bare
>> metal booting o
On 2012-08-21 18:10, Adam Williamson wrote:
Hey, folks. As discussed a couple of weeks back, I've always believed
the boot.iso, DVD and live boot method test cases ought to test bare
metal booting of actual physical optical media: we have no other test
cases specifically for this, and we do have
On Tue, 28 Aug 2012 10:33:05 -0600
Tim Flink wrote:
> Since bugzilla is down at the moment, I've disabled sync on the
> blocker bug tracking application until it comes back up.
>
> I'll re-enable sync once it comes back up but I wanted to send out a
> heads up in case anyone notices that it isn'
Since bugzilla is down at the moment, I've disabled sync on the blocker
bug tracking application until it comes back up.
I'll re-enable sync once it comes back up but I wanted to send out a
heads up in case anyone notices that it isn't syncing any more.
Tim
signature.asc
Description: PGP signat
# F18 Alpha Blocker Review meeting #5
# Date: 2012-08-29
# Time: 16:00 UTC [1] (12:00 EDT, 09:00 PDT)
# Location: #fedora-bugzappers on irc.freenode.net
Note: This is the new time for regular blocker review meetings
We'll be running through the alpha blockers and nice-to-haves. The
current list o
#312: OpenStack test day request for Aug 30th
---+-
Reporter: pbrady| Owner:
Type: defect| Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone:
Component: Test Day |Version:
Resolution:| Keywords:
Blocked By:
abrt has grammatical errors and I have attached a patch here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=852298
--
*Benjamin Kerensa*
*http://benjaminkerensa.com*
*"I am what I am because of who we all are" - Ubuntu*
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://ad
14 matches
Mail list logo
