Hey, folks. As discussed a couple of weeks back, I've always believed
the boot.iso, DVD and live boot method test cases ought to test bare
metal booting of actual physical optical media: we have no other test
cases specifically for this, and we do have other test cases
specifically for USB medi
#300: Proposed Test Day - Fedora Jam
---+
Reporter: jvlomax | Owner: jvlomax
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 18
Component: Test Day |Version:
Resolution:| Keywords: fe
Hey, folks. Just in case anyone's wondering what's happening about a
TC4/RC1 build...
I think it'd be best to have a new anaconda build in it, since we have
several significant anaconda fixes to include. Apparently, any anaconda
build now effectively relies on yum-3.4.3-32.fc18 or higher, whic
#312: OpenStack test day request for Aug 30th
---+-
Reporter: pbrady| Owner:
Type: defect| Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone:
Component: Test Day |Version:
Resolution:| Keywords:
Blocked By:
#300: Proposed Test Day - Fedora Jam
---+
Reporter: jvlomax | Owner: jvlomax
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 18
Component: Test Day |Version:
Resolution:| Keywords: fe
#300: Proposed Test Day - Fedora Jam
---+
Reporter: jvlomax | Owner: jvlomax
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 18
Component: Test Day |Version:
Resolution:| Keywords: fe
#300: Proposed Test Day - Fedora Jam
---+
Reporter: jvlomax | Owner: jvlomax
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 18
Component: Test Day |Version:
Resolution:| Keywords: fe
A version of the new blocker tracking app has been up for a little
while but the code is finally public and the app has a new home!
The blocker app now lives at:
http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/
A quick link to the current release blockers is at:
http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/cu
# F18 Alpha Blocker Review meeting #4
# Date: 2012-08-22
# Time: 16:00 UTC [1] (12:00 EDT, 09:00 PDT)
# Location: #fedora-bugzappers on irc.freenode.net
Note: This is the new time for regular blocker review meetings
We'll be running through the beta blockers and nice-to-haves. The
current list of
#311: Bug #847644 does not show up as a proposed blocker in the new blocker
tracker
---+---
Reporter: adamwill | Owner: tflink
Type: defect| Status: new
Priority: critical
#312: OpenStack test day request for Aug 30th
---+-
Reporter: pbrady| Owner:
Type: defect| Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone:
Component: Test Day |Version:
Resolution:| Keywords:
Blocked By:
#312: OpenStack test day request for Aug 30th
---+-
Reporter: pbrady| Owner:
Type: defect| Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone:
Component: Test Day |Version:
Resolution:| Keywords:
Blocked By:
#312: OpenStack test day request for Aug 30th
--+--
Reporter: pbrady| Owner:
Type: defect| Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone:
Component: Test Day | Version:
Keywords:| Blocked By:
Blocking:
The following Fedora 16 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
7
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-11813/xfig-3.2.5-32.b.fc16
7
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-11843/libvirt-0.9.6.2-1.fc16
6
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-1
> Adam Williamson redhat.com> writes:
>
> > I think this is a good idea, yeah. Wording the criterion could be a
> > little tricky, though - it feels like one of those areas where you
> > have
> > to be careful and precise about how you encapsulate 'works'. How
> > important are false negatives? F
15 matches
Mail list logo
