#301: Translations Testing Day Proposal
---+---
Reporter: pycrash | Owner:
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 18
Component: Test Day |Version:
Resolution:| Keywords:
Blocked By
On Wed, 2012-08-15 at 17:29 -0400, john.flor...@dart.biz wrote:
> > > > From: Adam Williamson
> > >
> > > > This is probably a terrible time to try preupgrade. It gets no
> major
> > > > love until Beta, usually. If your goal is a working install of
> F18,
> > > your
> > > > best option at prese
As per the Fedora 18 schedule [1], Fedora 18 Alpha Test Compose 2 (TC2)
is now available for testing. (Lives are expected to be available
later.) Content information, including changes, can be found at
https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5284#comment:4 . Please see the
following pages for downl
systemtap-2.0-0.2.git10c737f.fc18
vfrnav-20120815-1.fc18
votca-csg-1.2.1-5.fc18
xorg-x11-drv-intel-2.20.3-1.fc18
Details about builds:
activemq-protobuf-1.1-2.fc18 (FEDORA-2012-11969)
ActiveMQ Protocol
The following Fedora 17 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
1
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-11876/emacs-24.1-4.fc17
40
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-10269/revelation-0.4.14-1.fc17
1
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-11
The following Fedora 16 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
1
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-11813/xfig-3.2.5-32.b.fc16
1
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-11843/libvirt-0.9.6.2-1.fc16
1
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-1
> > > From: Adam Williamson
> >
> > > This is probably a terrible time to try preupgrade. It gets no major
> > > love until Beta, usually. If your goal is a working install of F18,
> > your
> > > best option at present is a yum update from F17, following the
> > > directions at
> > > https://fed
On Wed, 2012-08-15 at 16:47 -0400, john.flor...@dart.biz wrote:
> > From: Adam Williamson
>
> > This is probably a terrible time to try preupgrade. It gets no major
> > love until Beta, usually. If your goal is a working install of F18,
> your
> > best option at present is a yum update from F17,
> From: Adam Williamson
> This is probably a terrible time to try preupgrade. It gets no major
> love until Beta, usually. If your goal is a working install of F18, your
> best option at present is a yum update from F17, following the
> directions at
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/
> Upgrading_
On Wed, 2012-08-15 at 16:19 -0400, john.flor...@dart.biz wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I'm new to preupgrade and playing with Fedora test builds (alpha,
> beta, TC, RC or otherwise), but hardly new to Fedora. I'm hoping to
> do some early testing of F18 before it's released so I've built myself
> a F17 V
Hi All,
I'm new to preupgrade and playing with Fedora test builds (alpha, beta,
TC, RC or otherwise), but hardly new to Fedora. I'm hoping to do some
early testing of F18 before it's released so I've built myself a F17 VM,
fully updated it and have started the whole preupgrade process. I thin
On Wed, 2012-08-15 at 11:20 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Aug 15, 2012, at 9:09 AM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> >
> > Calling test composes something with "alpha" in the name is also a problem.
>
> The word "alpha" describes the test compose because TC1 by itself could apply
> to either the pre-alph
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 11:20:43 -0600,
Chris Murphy wrote:
*shrug* OK. I am however confused on the distinction between TC's and RC's.
TCs can be built when there are still blockers. In theory we shouldn't even
be trying to compose RCs without believing all blockers are resolved.
I thin
On Aug 15, 2012, at 9:09 AM, Adam Jackson wrote:
>
> Calling test composes something with "alpha" in the name is also a problem.
The word "alpha" describes the test compose because TC1 by itself could apply
to either the pre-alpha, pre-beta, or pre-final releases. So if alpha isn't
used as a d
#311: Bug #847644 does not show up as a proposed blocker in the new blocker
tracker
---+---
Reporter: adamwill | Owner: tflink
Type: defect| Status: new
Priority: critical
#311: Bug #847644 does not show up as a proposed blocker in the new blocker
tracker
---+---
Reporter: adamwill | Owner: tflink
Type: defect| Status: new
Priority: critical
#310: Proposed Test Day - realmd/sssd/AD
---+---
Reporter: stefw | Owner:
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 18
Component: Test Day |Version:
Resolution:| Keywords:
Blocked B
#311: Bug #847644 does not show up as a proposed blocker in the new blocker
tracker
---+---
Reporter: adamwill | Owner: tflink
Type: defect| Status: new
Priority: critical
# F18 Alpha Blocker Review meeting #3
# Date: 2012-08-16
# Time: 16:00 UTC [1] (12:00 EDT, 09:00 PDT)
# Location: #fedora-bugzappers on irc.freenode.net
I'm too used to the meetings being on Fridays. Despite my notice that
future meetings will be on Wednesdays, I forgot to send out an
announcement
#311: Bug #847644 does not show up as a proposed blocker in the new blocker
tracker
---+---
Reporter: adamwill | Owner: tflink
Type: defect| Status: new
Priority: critical
#311: Bug #847644 does not show up as a proposed blocker in the new blocker
tracker
--+
Reporter: adamwill | Owner: tflink
Type: defect| Status: new
Priority: critical
The following Fedora 18 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
0
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-11900/libotr-3.2.1-1.fc18
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora 18 updates-testing
cgnslib-3.1-3.r4.fc18
eekboard-1.0.8-1.fc18
fawkes-0.4.2-12.fc18
On 8/15/12 9:42 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
It would be far more honest to just call this alpha 1.
Sorry, I don't get it - is the problem calling Alpha gold, as it's
definitely not gold final release.
Calling alpha "gold" is a problem, sure.
Calling test composes something with "alpha" in th
- Original Message -
> On 8/13/12 10:33 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> > It is a test compose of the Alpha. Alpha comes before Beta which
> > comes
> > before Final. For each of Alpha, Beta and Final, we do test
> > composes and
> > then release candidates. The first test compose of the Al
On 8/15/12 2:40 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
We've discussed various ways to re-jig the structure in the past, but
something that simplistic certainly isn't it. We have specific
requirements for the Alpha, Beta and Final releases: they _must_ meet
those requirements in order to be shipped.
I was
On 08/15/2012 08:17 PM, Joachim Backes wrote:
>> 3.5.0-2 seems to be buggy! Try kernel-3.5.1-1 from Bodhi!
> Sorry, I meant: From *Koji* and not *Bodhi*!
>
Either way 3.5.1-1 *is* the current kernel in the updates repository.
So, a yum update will suffice.
--
Programming today is a race
On 08/15/2012 02:12 PM, Joachim Backes wrote:
> On 08/15/2012 02:07 PM, Sawrub wrote:
>> Hello All,
>>
>> On August 11 the latest Kernel 'kernel-3.5.0-2.fc17.x86_64' was updated
>> via YUM and on rebooting the machine, there was an error similar to
>> 'Welcome to emergency mode. Use systemctl def
On 08/15/2012 02:07 PM, Sawrub wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> On August 11 the latest Kernel 'kernel-3.5.0-2.fc17.x86_64' was updated
> via YUM and on rebooting the machine, there was an error similar to
> 'Welcome to emergency mode. Use systemctl default or ^D to active
> default mode' for a second d
Chuck Anderson wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 09:33:36PM -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
>> Chuck Anderson wrote:
>>
>> > I ran into a comedy of errors today after I did a new F17 installation
>> > yesterday. Here are a couple:
>> >
>> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848148
>> > Error
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 5:30 AM, Chuck Anderson wrote:
> I ran into a comedy of errors today after I did a new F17 installation
> yesterday. Here are a couple:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848148
> Error in PREIN scriptlet in rpm package wireshark-1.6.9-1.fc17.x86_64
>
> (and w
On 08/14/2012 10:30 PM, Chuck Anderson wrote:
I ran into a comedy of errors today after I did a new F17 installation
yesterday. Here are a couple:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848148
Error in PREIN scriptlet in rpm package wireshark-1.6.9-1.fc17.x86_64
(and why does yum still le
31 matches
Mail list logo
