#310: Proposed Test Day - realmd/sssd/AD
--+
Reporter: stefw | Owner:
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 18
Component: Test Day | Version:
Keywords:| Blocked By:
Blocking
On 2012-08-14 5:26, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 8:21 AM, Adam Jackson
wrote:
On 8/13/12 10:33 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
It is a test compose of the Alpha. Alpha comes before Beta which
comes
before Final. For each of Alpha, Beta and Final, we do test
composes and
then release
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 09:33:36PM -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Chuck Anderson wrote:
>
> > I ran into a comedy of errors today after I did a new F17 installation
> > yesterday. Here are a couple:
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848148
> > Error in PREIN scriptlet in rpm packag
Chuck Anderson wrote:
> I ran into a comedy of errors today after I did a new F17 installation
> yesterday. Here are a couple:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848148
> Error in PREIN scriptlet in rpm package wireshark-1.6.9-1.fc17.x86_64
>
> (and why does yum still let the trans
The following Fedora 16 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
0
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-11813/xfig-3.2.5-32.b.fc16
0
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-11843/libvirt-0.9.6.2-1.fc16
0
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-1
The following Fedora 17 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
0
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-11876/emacs-24.1-4.fc17
39
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-10269/revelation-0.4.14-1.fc17
0
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-11
I ran into a comedy of errors today after I did a new F17 installation
yesterday. Here are a couple:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848148
Error in PREIN scriptlet in rpm package wireshark-1.6.9-1.fc17.x86_64
(and why does yum still let the transaction succeed, creating problems
in
Hi guys,
I'm very glad to join at Fedora Bug Zappers Team. Before I work with
Fedora LInux, I worked with Slackware and Gentoo Linux since 2001
at ISP (before college).
Currently I live in the city of Sao Carlos - São Paulo, Brazil. I'm a
student
of Computer Science at the University of São Paulo
On Tue, 2012-08-14 at 09:09 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Aug 2012 09:58:32 -0500
> Mike Chambers wrote:
>
> > Is Fedora 18, at some point, suppose to be using the F18 testing
> > directory for updates and such, before it moves to the actual F18
> > tree? Assuming this happens when Alpha
On Tue, 14 Aug 2012 09:58:32 -0500
Mike Chambers wrote:
> Is Fedora 18, at some point, suppose to be using the F18 testing
> directory for updates and such, before it moves to the actual F18
> tree? Assuming this happens when Alpha comes out or something? Or am
> I missing something?
Yes. We wi
Is Fedora 18, at some point, suppose to be using the F18 testing
directory for updates and such, before it moves to the actual F18 tree?
Assuming this happens when Alpha comes out or something? Or am I
missing something?
--
Mike Chambers
Madisonville, KY
"Best little town on Earth!"
--
test m
David Timms iinet.net.au> writes:
> By the way, since people might be keeping up with rawhide repo, does
> anyone still make jigdo definitions for the Fedora test/release isos.
> For me these would save a huge amount of time/bandwidth (that I don't
> have) ?
If rsync is available, it should s
On 08/14/2012 11:59 PM, Andre Robatino wrote:
The most likely problem is a truncated download. Make sure your downloaded file
is in fact 1434024108 bytes. If it's shorter, you can use wget -c to complete
the download. If it still doesn't match, you can use rsync to fix the download
as described
On 08/14/2012 11:14 PM, David Timms wrote:
Can someone confirm md5sum ...diso matches the -MD5SUM file ?
Don't bother. I realized that I had downloaded to a different folder,
and so the one I was checking against was a partial download only (10Mb
of 1.3GB). Thanks anyway.
--
test mailing list
David Timms iinet.net.au> writes:
> I downloaded the DVD diso and MD5SUM files, but the local MD5SUM
> mismatches (Fedora 17 x86_64):
>
> $ md5sum Fedora-17_18-Alpha.TC1-x86_64-DVD.diso
> 76fc8798ac584d57d911a796c4fb5cec Fedora-17_18-Alpha.TC1-x86_64-DVD.diso
>
> $ cat Fedora-17_18-Alpha.TC1-
I downloaded the DVD diso and MD5SUM files, but the local MD5SUM
mismatches (Fedora 17 x86_64):
$ md5sum Fedora-17_18-Alpha.TC1-x86_64-DVD.diso
76fc8798ac584d57d911a796c4fb5cec Fedora-17_18-Alpha.TC1-x86_64-DVD.diso
$ cat Fedora-17_18-Alpha.TC1-x86_64-MD5SUM
67c4fceb95fc335e33be10e3de4df3aa *F
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 8:21 AM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On 8/13/12 10:33 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
>> It is a test compose of the Alpha. Alpha comes before Beta which comes
>> before Final. For each of Alpha, Beta and Final, we do test composes and
>> then release candidates. The first test comp
On 8/13/12 10:33 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
It is a test compose of the Alpha. Alpha comes before Beta which comes
before Final. For each of Alpha, Beta and Final, we do test composes and
then release candidates. The first test compose of the Alpha is by
definition the earliest and most likely-t
The following Fedora 16 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
0
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-11813/xfig-3.2.5-32.b.fc16
0
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-11843/libvirt-0.9.6.2-1.fc16
39
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-1
The following Fedora 17 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
0
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-11838/libvirt-0.9.11.5-1.fc17
39
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-10269/revelation-0.4.14-1.fc17
4
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2
Hi guys,
I'm very glad to join at Fedora Bug Zappers Team. I,m a beginner in the
use Fedora. But i have motivation to provide my dedication in the next
fedora development. So, my hope is acceptable in this project.
As consideration, i have little experience like system administration
database as
21 matches
Mail list logo
