On Tue, 2012-06-19 at 21:25 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> As always, minutes and IRC transcript available on the wiki at
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Meetings/20120618
>
> Next meeting is scheduled for 2012-06-25 at 1500 UTC in #fedora-meeting.
> If you have topics you think we should bri
As always, minutes and IRC transcript available on the wiki at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Meetings/20120618
Next meeting is scheduled for 2012-06-25 at 1500 UTC in #fedora-meeting.
If you have topics you think we should bring up at the meeting, please
add them to the Wiki page at
https://fe
Hello!
The runoff election for the remaining Fedora Board seat has concluded.
There was one remaining seat available. A total of 182 votes were cast,
meaning a candidate could accumulate up to 364 votes (182 * 2). The
results are shown below.
# votes | name
-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
El Tue, 19 Jun 2012 17:49:22 -0700
Rob Healey escribió:
> Greetings:
>
> I have been anxiously awaiting for a usable nightly bouild live cd for
> rawhide since it flipped and started creating the nightly builds
> based on Rawhide! So far the failure
Greetings:
I have been anxiously awaiting for a usable nightly bouild live cd for
rawhide since it flipped and started creating the nightly builds based on
Rawhide! So far the failures have seemed to be major issues of why not.
This one seems like such a little issue! I hope that it can be reso
The following Fedora 15 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-9008/boost-1.46.0-4.fc15
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-9329/roundcubemail-0.7.2-2.fc15
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-7246/libsoup-2.3
The following Fedora 16 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-9029/boost-1.47.0-7.fc16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-9037/thunderbird-lightning-1.5-2.fc16,thunderbird-13.0-1.fc16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/update
On 06/19/2012 08:33 PM, Tim Flink wrote:
Any thoughts on other reasonable features to look into or other
comments/thoughts?
Looks good I personally would prefer having the Bug ID and Bodhi links
tied together on the right site since I would use that the most but
that's subjected to the eye of
Richard Shaw wrote:
> I wonder, is the package name "libnettle" acceptable? Generally the
> main package name needs to be the same as the upstream name, which is
> just nettle.
You're right. Fixed.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 15:33:49 -0500,
Tim Flink wrote:
Any thoughts on other reasonable features to look into or other
comments/thoughts?
It seems to provide the information we need.
Does it handle nested blocker bugs?
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
htt
So, I've been working to update the script that updates the blocker bug
tracking page.
I have the basic bugzilla search functionality working but before I
start spending time on small features or beautification, I figured I
would ask for comments.
The demo page is at:
http://tflink.fedorapeople
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> Nettle contains many pieces so I've taken an alternative approach to
> packaging it.
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833573
Yes, I noticed the separate libraries but was doing a minimal packaging job.
I wonder, is the
Richard Shaw wrote:
> nettle was easy enough to package[1]... Took about 10 minutes, but I
> don't have any real interest in maintaining it...
>
> Someone want to pick it up?
Nettle contains many pieces so I've taken an alternative approach to
packaging it.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.c
With NV3x adapters experiencing 3D screen corruption in F16/F17, and the
abysmal gnome-shell performance of nvidia's 173.14.35 driver, I
attempted a yum upgrade to rawhide for a look at Mesa-8.1, which I
understand has a new driver. Unfortunately, that installation won't
start up.
So, I've b
The 389 Project team is pleased to announce the release of
389-ds-base-1.2.10.10 and 1.2.11.5 for Testing. 1.2.10.10 contains a
fix for a crashing issue:
#390 [abrt] 389-ds-base-1.2.10.6-1.fc16: slapi_attr_value_cmp: Process
/usr/sbin/ns-slapd was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
https://fedor
Scriptlet failures that happen on uninstall can be detected by doing a yum
reinstall on the package. However, testers don't normally do this, so they
usually don't get detected until the next update, and it can be difficult to
find which of the many updates is generating the error message. Would it
The following Fedora 15 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-9008/boost-1.46.0-4.fc15
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-9329/roundcubemail-0.7.2-2.fc15
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-7246/libsoup-2.3
The following Fedora 16 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-9029/boost-1.47.0-7.fc16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-9037/thunderbird-lightning-1.5-2.fc16,thunderbird-13.0-1.fc16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/update
Steve Dickson wrote:
>It was never removed, since its needed for the NFS server. The service
>is no longer enabled when nfs-utils is installed or upgrade since the
>NFS client now used a keyring based upcall to do its ID mapping...
>
OK, thanks for correcting my failed memory.
--
Sent from
19 matches
Mail list logo
