On Thu, 2012-06-07 at 23:17 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 17:14:05 -0700,
>Adam Williamson wrote:
> >
> >Thoughts? We could theoretically require only the whole-system overlay
> >to work, not the separate /home overlay, but the separate /home overlay
> >possibility ex
On 07/06/12 23:49, drago01 wrote:
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 11:51 PM, Rob Healey wrote:
Greetings:
Is anyone else getting this problem in rawhide?
No optical drive found.
K3b did not find any optical device in your system.
Solution: Make sure HAL daemon is running, it is used by K3b for finding
Hi Adam,
I shall definitely give those a look and see where I can help out, thanks!
On 8 June 2012 03:17, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-06-07 at 23:30 +0530, Sri Krishna wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I've been sitting in on these lists for a couple of months now, and
> > I've been approved
On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 17:14:05 -0700,
Adam Williamson wrote:
Thoughts? We could theoretically require only the whole-system overlay
to work, not the separate /home overlay, but the separate /home overlay
possibility exists for a good reason - the whole-system overlay is very
easy to exhaust
Hey, folks. During F17 cycle we added some validation tests for writing
images to USB, but we don't have explicit criteria covering this. I'm
proposing two new criteria for this, and a minor adjustment to an
existing criterion.
Alpha:
Change existing criterion:
* The installer must boot (if appr
#260: Cover USB-written images better in installation validation testing
---+---
Reporter: adamwill | Owner: jskladan
Type: task | Status: closed
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 17
Component: Wiki |Version:
R
During the F17 cycle, we found that live image persistence was broken:
http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=740280
and further found that there was no criterion covering this. At the time
the issue was first discussed, we agreed we should add a criterion to
cover live image persistence. (In
The following Fedora 15 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-8114/libreoffice-3.3.4.1-5.fc15
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-9008/boost-1.46.0-4.fc15
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-6630/dokuwiki-0-
On Fri, 2012-06-08 at 01:55 +0300, Kalev Lember wrote:
> On 06/08/2012 12:44 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Well, what do you mean by 'use it', exactly? F17 has GTK+ 3.4. 3.5 is a
> > new major version - it's not API/ABI compatible. If you were going to
> > backport it to F17 you'd have to either i
On 06/08/2012 12:44 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Well, what do you mean by 'use it', exactly? F17 has GTK+ 3.4. 3.5 is a
> new major version - it's not API/ABI compatible. If you were going to
> backport it to F17 you'd have to either install it alongside 3.4 - in
> which case you would not, in pra
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 11:51 PM, Rob Healey wrote:
> Greetings:
>
> Is anyone else getting this problem in rawhide?
>
> No optical drive found.
> K3b did not find any optical device in your system.
> Solution: Make sure HAL daemon is running, it is used by K3b for finding
> devices.
Hal is dead.
Greetings:
Is anyone else getting this problem in rawhide?
No optical drive found.
K3b did not find any optical device in your system.
Solution: Make sure HAL daemon is running, it is used by K3b for finding
devices.
In using gnome-tweak-tool, I have nautilus displayed on the desktop, so I
can
On Thu, 2012-06-07 at 23:30 +0530, Sri Krishna wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've been sitting in on these lists for a couple of months now, and
> I've been approved as a Bugzapper. But I didn't really have any idea
> how to continue with it, and for one reason or another I haven't had
> the time to pursue
On Wed, 2012-06-06 at 23:50 -0400, Rob Healey wrote:
> Dear erald Henriksen:
>
> >I can see from the download.gnome.org site, that they have gtk
> +-3.5.4, and
> >the Fedora koji repository only has gtk+-1.2.10-72 ...
>
> Fedora has packages for gtk+ 1, 2 and 3.
>
> Search koji for gtk3 (the rpm
On Wed, 2012-06-06 at 12:53 -0700, Rob Healey wrote:
> Dear Adam:
>
> >> Would it be a bad idea, to download this and re-compile it for
> fc17???
>
> > Um. Probably, yes. Why would you want to do that?
> --
> Adam Williamson
>
> The only reason why, would be to use it now rather than having to w
Hello,
I've been sitting in on these lists for a couple of months now, and I've
been approved as a Bugzapper. But I didn't really have any idea how to
continue with it, and for one reason or another I haven't had the time to
pursue it till now.
Can anyone help me wrap my head around how to do this
Compose started at Thu Jun 7 08:15:04 UTC 2012
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[389-admin]
389-admin-1.1.28-1.fc18.i686 requires libicuuc.so.48
389-admin-1.1.28-1.fc18.i686 requires libicui18n.so.48
389-admin-1.1.28-1.fc18.
On Wed, 2012-06-06 at 12:53 -0700, Rob Healey wrote:
>
> The only reason why, would be to use it now rather than having to wait
> for FC18 to stabilize a little more first. If this is such a bad
> idea, then I will wait for rawhide?
Rawhide is not that bad currently.
Of course, everybody ha
18 matches
Mail list logo
