After having installed systemd-44-8.fc17 *and* applying the most recent
F17 updates (includes a *glibc* update) , the reboot problem has
deteriorated:
1) Even going from runlevel 5 into runlevel 3 and then rebooting (was
previously a workaround) no more helps.
2) Booting directly into to runlevel
Adam Williamson wrote:
/boot on RAID was, for a long time, considered a problematic
configuration and is explicitly excepted from the release criteria. I
believe the anaconda team's attitude towards this configuration is
becoming somewhat more liberal, though, so we may have to re-consider
the cr
On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 06:38:21PM -0700, Antonio Olivares wrote:
>
> I don't see in the reports that the package(s) are broken,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=814451
I am not sure how did you manage to install
samba4-client-4.0.0-41alpha18.fc17 though. Do you still have installed
> Packages skipped because of dependency problems:
> 1:samba4-client-4.0.0-45alpha18.fc17.i686 from updates-testing
> 1:samba4-common-4.0.0-45alpha18.fc17.i686 from updates-testing
> 1:samba4-dc-4.0.0-45alpha18.fc17.i686 from updates-testing
> 1:samba4-dc-libs-4.0.0-45alpha18.fc17.i
On 05/02/2012 06:57 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
The image boots and installation (with *defaults*) begins. It gets to
160 packages of 1212 and errors on perl.
"A unpack error occurred when installing the perl package..."
I burned the image to a real DVD and installation succeeded.
My gues
On 05/02/2012 11:26 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-04-29 at 02:24 -0500, Mike Chambers wrote:
>> Did an upgrade from F16 to current F17 tree + updates on my server and
>> all seemed well.
>>
>> Except for dovecot..which after the upgrade, it seemed to error on my
>> client side (via imap
Dear folks,
for a good while now, I have kept getting the following every time I yum update
:
Loaded plugins: langpacks, presto, refresh-packagekit
Cleaning repos: fedora updates updates-testing
Cleaning up Everything
No delta-package files removed by presto
Loaded plugins: langpacks, presto, r
On 05/02/2012 03:24 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
It's good of you to do this, but it would be even_better_ if you'd
follow the test cases at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test#USB_Stick
, file bugs on any failures, and enter your results into the matrix, with
Dude, the only reason I continued the discussion here is because you did. :-)
You're right, this is not the place. I'll take it up with the GIMP folks.
Jik
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
On Wed, 2012-05-02 at 17:45 -0400, Jonathan Kamens wrote:
> On 05/02/2012 05:36 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Sun, 2012-04-29 at 09:48 -0400, Jonathan Kamens wrote:
> > > I agree. The save vs. export thing in the new version of gimp is
> > > mind-numbingly stupid.
> > Makes perfect sense to me
On Wed, 2012-05-02 at 16:24 -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> On 05/02/2012 04:22 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Sat, 2012-04-28 at 20:30 +0100, Frank Murphy wrote:
> >> On 28/04/12 20:26, antonio wrote:
> >>> I upgraded from F-16 to F-17 Beta, then upgraded to find that I
> >>> couldn't delete my
On Wed, 2012-05-02 at 03:02 -0600, Tim Flink wrote:
> # F17 Final Blocker Review meeting #3
> # Date: 2012-05-03
> # Time: 17:00 UTC [1] (13:00 EDT, 10:00 PDT)
> # Location: #fedora-bugzappers on irc.freenode.net
>
> Note the non-usual time - Thursday instead of Friday.
>
> We were able to get th
Frequent hangs for anywhere from a second to 30 seconds. Lack of responsiveness
to key and button presses. Delays from when I clicked a scroll bar and dragged
it to when the window actually scrolled. Frequent long delays from when an
external app tried to launch a page to when the tab actually o
On Tue, 2012-05-01 at 14:46 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> I would like to propose https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809111 as
> a
> blocker or https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=750794 as they are
> related. I am surprised that this hasn't been brought up already as I am
> una
On Tue, 2012-05-01 at 10:14 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Tue, 01 May 2012 09:50:22 -0400
> Jonathan Kamens wrote:
>
> > Does anybody have any thoughts?
>
> My only thought is that firefox became popular mainly because
> it wasn't a slow bloated mess, now it has evolved into a slow
> bloated mes
Another option would have been the LibreOffice approach... Warn the user about
saving in a non-native format but allow it (and allow the warning to be turned
off).
Another option would have been for the save dialog to default to FCC but allow
the user to change it to any other format. Instead,
On Mon, 2012-04-30 at 13:35 -0400, ergodic wrote:
> Has anyone experienced Palimpsest discrepancies?
>
> Palimsest in Fedora 16 reports a disk (MAXTOR STM3320620AS) as
> failing: "DISK HAS MANY BAD SECTORS" etc.
> SMART: 197 Current pending Sector Count Value -4 sectors.
>
> Palimsest in Fedora
On 05/02/2012 05:36 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sun, 2012-04-29 at 09:48 -0400, Jonathan Kamens wrote:
I agree. The save vs. export thing in the new version of gimp is mind-numbingly
stupid.
Makes perfect sense to me. It's the same logic used in Audacity. You are
always losing information wh
On Sun, 2012-04-29 at 09:48 -0400, Jonathan Kamens wrote:
> I agree. The save vs. export thing in the new version of gimp is
> mind-numbingly stupid.
Makes perfect sense to me. It's the same logic used in Audacity. You are
always losing information when 'saving' to an image format - the record
of
On Sun, 2012-04-29 at 02:24 -0500, Mike Chambers wrote:
> Did an upgrade from F16 to current F17 tree + updates on my server and
> all seemed well.
>
> Except for dovecot..which after the upgrade, it seemed to error on my
> client side (via imap) about namespace and inbox=yes and no namespace or
>
On Wed, 2012-05-02 at 13:48 -0700, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
>
> On 05/02/2012 01:28 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Wed, 2012-05-02 at 07:36 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote:
> >>> Here is the "default" I use. Askmothod is ignored.
> >>> I installed 3312 apps on the last pxeboot install.
> >
Il 02/05/2012 22:54, Daniel J Walsh ha scritto:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/02/2012 04:35 PM, antonio montagnani wrote:
Il 02/05/2012 22:24, Daniel J Walsh ha scritto: On 05/02/2012 04:22 PM,
Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sat, 2012-04-28 at 20:30 +0100, Frank Murphy wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/02/2012 04:35 PM, antonio montagnani wrote:
> Il 02/05/2012 22:24, Daniel J Walsh ha scritto: On 05/02/2012 04:22 PM,
> Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sat, 2012-04-28 at 20:30 +0100, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On 28/04/12 20:26, antonio wrote:
>>>
On 05/02/2012 01:28 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2012-05-02 at 07:36 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote:
Here is the "default" I use. Askmothod is ignored.
I installed 3312 apps on the last pxeboot install.
Don't use root= argument, that might cause a lot of problems, just repo=.
Please don't t
Il 02/05/2012 22:24, Daniel J Walsh ha scritto:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/02/2012 04:22 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sat, 2012-04-28 at 20:30 +0100, Frank Murphy wrote:
On 28/04/12 20:26, antonio wrote:
I upgraded from F-16 to F-17 Beta, then upgraded to find that I
Il 02/05/2012 22:24, Daniel J Walsh ha scritto:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/02/2012 04:22 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sat, 2012-04-28 at 20:30 +0100, Frank Murphy wrote:
On 28/04/12 20:26, antonio wrote:
I upgraded from F-16 to F-17 Beta, then upgraded to find that I
On Wed, 2012-05-02 at 07:36 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote:
> > Here is the "default" I use. Askmothod is ignored.
> > I installed 3312 apps on the last pxeboot install.
>
> Don't use root= argument, that might cause a lot of problems, just repo=.
>
> Please don't top-post.
Have we checked that the n
On Sat, 2012-04-28 at 23:46 -0500, Michael Hennebry wrote:
> What should I do about the messages?
> Would yum reinstalling some packages, e.g. selinux-policy-targeted, help?
> What are the consequences of just ignoring them?
At this point I'd say file a bug against selinux-policy for that issue,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/02/2012 04:22 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-04-28 at 20:30 +0100, Frank Murphy wrote:
>> On 28/04/12 20:26, antonio wrote:
>>> I upgraded from F-16 to F-17 Beta, then upgraded to find that I
>>> couldn't delete my own files!!! after d
On Sat, 2012-04-28 at 12:40 -0700, Thomas Gilliard wrote:
> ==Testing of f17 TC2 in USB==
It's good of you to do this, but it would be even _better_ if you'd
follow the test cases at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test#USB_Stick
, file bugs on any failures, and e
On Sat, 2012-04-28 at 20:30 +0100, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On 28/04/12 20:26, antonio wrote:
> > I upgraded from F-16 to F-17 Beta, then upgraded to find that I couldn't
> > delete my own files!!! after disabling Selinux and enabling it again
> > (i.e. relabeling) everything is o.k.Anybody experienci
The Gnome Boxes test day is currently scheduled for tomorrow,
2012-05-03 but the wiki page is still has no test cases and thus is not
ready for tomorrow.
After talking to Petr Schindler this morning, we agreed that it would
be best to delay the test day by one week to the currently empty
2012-05-1
#276: Gnome Boxes Test Day
---+---
Reporter: vbenes| Owner: kparal
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 17
Component: Test Day |Version:
Resolution:| Keywords:
Blocked By:
Yes I had the same.
it seems config file format has changed between versions or something. You
may have some ".rpmnew" files in /etc/dovecot after the upgrade. - I copied
across the new format, added my info and was away.
On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 8:24 AM, Mike Chambers wrote:
> Did an upgrade
On 5/1/12 6:09 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
On Tue, 01 May 2012 15:51:08 -0400
Adam Jackson wrote:
- xulrunner maybe shouldn't assert PRIMARY ownership in this case
That's the point for me: What on earth in the bookmarks
sidebar needs or wants the selection? And it is a super
long delay just in fir
From: Tim Flink To: test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: Re: Testing Needed for F17 Final Blockers Message-ID:
<20120501181944.3ef06...@river.tirfa.net> Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="utf-8" On Tue, 1 May 2012 18:16:35 -0600 Tim Flink
wrote:
I just went through the sizable list of F17 f
> Here is the "default" I use. Askmothod is ignored.
> I installed 3312 apps on the last pxeboot install.
Don't use root= argument, that might cause a lot of problems, just repo=.
Please don't top-post.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraprojec
On Tue, 2012-05-01 at 16:08 -0700, Brian C. Lane wrote:
> Back in Fedora 16 we tried to advance the state of the art. We switched
> to using GPT disklabels by default, and in many cases this worked just
> fine. But it has become increasingly obvious that the hardware isn't
> ready for us. We contin
# F17 Final Blocker Review meeting #3
# Date: 2012-05-03
# Time: 17:00 UTC [1] (13:00 EDT, 10:00 PDT)
# Location: #fedora-bugzappers on irc.freenode.net
Note the non-usual time - Thursday instead of Friday.
We were able to get through some of the blockers at the review meeting
earlier today but t
Hello!
Just an heads-up, on F17 Korganizer seems to forget tasks after exiting.
Can anyone confirm this?
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
On 05/01/2012 12:40 PM, Mike Chambers wrote:
On Tue, 2012-05-01 at 09:31 -0400, Braden McDaniel wrote:
I am using NFS (v4) home directories. The server is running Fedora 16;
the client is running Fedora 17. Recently, when running Evolution on
the client, I find that Evolution becomes completel
41 matches
Mail list logo
