Fernando Cassia wrote:
> I do not have LibreOffice installed on my system, I have Apache
> OpenOffice 3.4 RC1.
Installed how? Via RPM? Gotten how/where?
> However, launching the system updater notifies me that there is an
> update available for URE-Runtime (a component of LibreOffice) and
> proc
The following Fedora 15 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-6999/samba-3.5.15-74.fc15.1
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-6996/expat-2.1.0-1.fc15
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-6395/openssl-1.0.0i-1
The following Fedora 16 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-7006/samba-3.6.5-85.fc16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-6529/argyllcms-1.4.0-1.fc16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-5833/python3-3.2.3-1
#293: proventester request
-+--
Reporter: trafalger888 | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: major| Milestone:
Component: Proventester Mentor Reques
On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 12:54:02 -0400
Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 12:56 PM, stan wrote:
> > I always compile the Fedora kernel package with a custom config that
> > tunes it for my system. The config file that worked on the 3.3.2
> > kernels fails on the 3.3.4 kernels, complaining
==
The results in this summary consider Test Updates!
==
Still broken compared with F-17+updates:
34 builds
Fixed packages compared with F-17+updates:
On Mon, 2012-04-30 at 13:35 -0400, ergodic wrote:
> Has anyone experienced Palimpsest discrepancies?
>
> Palimsest in Fedora 16 reports a disk (MAXTOR STM3320620AS) as
> failing: "DISK HAS MANY BAD SECTORS" etc.
> SMART: 197 Current pending Sector Count Value -4 sectors.
>
> Palimsest in Fedora
> Palimsest in Fedora 16 reports a disk (MAXTOR STM3320620AS) as failing:
> "DISK HAS MANY BAD SECTORS" etc.
> SMART: 197 Current pending Sector Count Value -4 sectors.
>
> Palimsest in Fedora 17 beta reports the same disk (MAXTOR STM3320620AS) as
> "OK"
> SMART: 197 Current pending Sector Co
On 30/04/12 11:35 AM, ergodic wrote:
Has anyone experienced Palimpsest discrepancies?
Palimsest in Fedora 16 reports a disk (MAXTOR STM3320620AS) as failing: "DISK HAS
MANY BAD SECTORS" etc.
SMART: 197 Current pending Sector Count Value -4 sectors.
Palimsest in Fedora 17 beta reports the same
Has anyone experienced Palimpsest discrepancies?
Palimsest in Fedora 16 reports a disk (MAXTOR STM3320620AS) as failing: "DISK
HAS MANY BAD SECTORS" etc.
SMART: 197 Current pending Sector Count Value -4 sectors.
Palimsest in Fedora 17 beta reports the same disk (MAXTOR STM3320620AS) as "OK"
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 12:56 PM, stan wrote:
> I always compile the Fedora kernel package with a custom config that
> tunes it for my system. The config file that worked on the 3.3.2
> kernels fails on the 3.3.4 kernels, complaining that CONFIG_FB_EFI is
> not defined. I have no EFI, so it is t
I always compile the Fedora kernel package with a custom config that
tunes it for my system. The config file that worked on the 3.3.2
kernels fails on the 3.3.4 kernels, complaining that CONFIG_FB_EFI is
not defined. I have no EFI, so it is turned off completely in my
config file, but it looks li
Compose started at Mon Apr 30 08:15:04 UTC 2012
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[389-admin]
389-admin-1.1.28-1.fc18.i686 requires libicuuc.so.48
389-admin-1.1.28-1.fc18.i686 requires libicui18n.so.48
389-admin-1.1.28-1.fc18.
As always, minutes and IRC transcript available on the wiki at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Meetings/20120430
Next meeting is scheduled for 2012-05-07 at 1500 UTC in #fedora-meeting.
If you have topics you think we should bring up at the meeting, please
add them to the Wiki page at
https
On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 23:35:58 +0800
Ed Greshko wrote:
> I look a all these changes related to GIMP, systemd, GNOME 3, KDE 4, grub2 as
> challenges and an Alzheimer's avoidance strategy.
I sorta do too. That's one of the reasons I started my
"Game Of Linux" web pages :-).
http://home.comcast.net/~
On 04/30/2012 07:21 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 12:26:39 +0200
> Karel Volný wrote:
>
>> I hope there doesn't exist one more step before like "in previous
>> iteration, users were bad to us, so let's break some feature to
>> do harm to them" :-)
> I have yet another theory - what
On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 07:21:08 -0400
Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 12:26:39 +0200
> Karel Volný wrote:
>
> > I hope there doesn't exist one more step before like "in previous
> > iteration, users were bad to us, so let's break some feature to
> > do harm to them" :-)
>
> I have yet a
Dne Ne 29. dubna 2012 11:40:49, Fernando Cassia napsal(a):
> On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 10:25, Karel Volný
wrote:
> > So, feel free to join me with the moment of silence for the
> > good old GIMP that is just getting buried.
>
> I share your pain. I've given up on Linux image editors.
>
> For simple
Compose started at Mon Apr 30 08:15:04 UTC 2012
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[LuxRender]
LuxRender-blender-0.8.0-13.fc17.x86_64 requires blender(ABI) = 0:2.61
[aeolus-conductor]
aeolus-conductor-0.4.0-2.fc17.noarch requires ruby(
On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 12:26:39 +0200
Karel Volný wrote:
> I hope there doesn't exist one more step before like "in previous
> iteration, users were bad to us, so let's break some feature to
> do harm to them" :-)
I have yet another theory - what if it is deliberate sabotage
by people who would pr
Hi,
Dne Ne 29. dubna 2012 19:03:18, Máirín Duffy napsal(a):
> On Sun, 2012-04-29 at 15:25 +0200, Karel Volný wrote:
> > So, feel free to join me with the moment of silence for the
> > good old GIMP that is just getting buried.
>
> If you could tone down the snark and indignation [1] you might
> h
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 10:26:28 +0100,
Adam Williamson wrote:
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
# Date: 2012-04-30
# Time: 15:00 UTC
I'm commuting to Chicago for SANS training this week and will at best
be able to have a distracted presence at the QA and blocker meetings
this week.
--
test
t I hope Tim or someone will be able to lead it.
This is a reminder of the upcoming QA meeting. Please add any topic
suggestions to the meeting wiki page:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Meetings/20120430
The current proposed agenda is included below.
== Proposed Agenda Topics ==
1. Previous meet
Hello
GSoC 2012 selection process is over ! We had a high demand
from the students and since we are offering some limited slots we
couldn't accept all the good students.
Therefore we are planning to launch a program for returning students
(who didnt select for GSoC with Fedora).
The structure of
On 30/04/12 07:56, Tony Molloy wrote:
Hi,
Before I install Fedora 17 beta can I check two things.
1. Does 17 work with GPT partitions
With my F17 KVM guests pre-formatted to GPT, yes
2. In a dual boot situation will 17 work with a previously defined LUKS
encrypted partition
Thanks,
Tony
25 matches
Mail list logo
