On Thu, 2012-04-19 at 09:07 +0300, cornel panceac wrote:
> with a chance this was already mentioned, what's a good place to learn
> how to create those .desktop files?
If you want to do it by hand, the easiest thing to do is probably just
to copy an existing one and modify it to your needs.
--
A
2012/4/19 John Morris
> On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 21:22 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> > On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 15:04 -0300, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> >
> > > I know this doesn´t solve my problem, but I´m outraged.
> >
> > In general, we expect an application to bring a suitable desktop file so
> > it
The following Fedora 15 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-5631/phpMyAdmin-3.5.0-1.fc15
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-5805/samba-3.5.14-73.fc15.1
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-5822/gallery3-3
The following Fedora 16 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-5624/phpMyAdmin-3.5.0-1.fc16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-5058/expat-2.1.0-1.fc16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-5833/python3-3.2.3-1
On Thu, 2012-04-19 at 03:26 +0100, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 21:38 -0400, Ma
>
> Honestly, I'm not sure there's any difference at all between 'mount on
> attach' and 'mount on any attempt to access' from a security POV.
http://git.gnome.org/browse/gvfs/commit/?id=e30a67f3215
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 6:39 PM, Tommy Pham wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 10:32 AM, Tommy Pham wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Felix Miata wrote:
>>> On 2012/04/18 09:42 (GMT-0700) Tommy Pham composed:
>>>
Tried a i386 F17 Beta on an old Dell Optiplex GX280 machine here at
>>
On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 21:19 -0500, John Morris wrote:
> On the other hand, has there ever been a real case found in the wild of
> an infestation that was so good at covering its tracks? The security
> problems I saw in the past were the crudest script kiddies and I haven't
> even seen one of thos
On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 21:38 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> The arguments are really going downhill here. I'm not overly interested
> in wading into this, but I'll just say that whenever we do something
> automatically, somebody will get mad. In the past, auto-mounting (and
> even just automatical
On Thu, 2012-04-19 at 02:30 +0100, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > And rpm -Va doesn't
> > show anything nasty in the packages that would give an intruder an in.
>
> If someone's owned the machine, they can make rpm -Va say whatever they
> like.
Which brings up a good point. I know that the only way
On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 21:22 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 15:04 -0300, Fernando Cassia wrote:
>
> > I know this doesn´t solve my problem, but I´m outraged.
>
> In general, we expect an application to bring a suitable desktop file so
> it is usable after you installed it. T
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 10:32 AM, Tommy Pham wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Felix Miata wrote:
>> On 2012/04/18 09:42 (GMT-0700) Tommy Pham composed:
>>
>>> Tried a i386 F17 Beta on an old Dell Optiplex GX280 machine here at
>>> work and works fine. However my new upgraded home machi
On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 16:48 -0400, Jonathan Kamens wrote:
> On 04/18/2012 04:45 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > It shows up in the file manager; it's not mounted.
> Why not?
>
> In F16, it was mounted.
>
> In Windows, it's mounted.
>
> In Mac OS, it's mounted.
>
> Why should F17 behave differen
On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 19:25 -0500, John Morris wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 18:13 +0100, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> > Not all hacks involve the attacker posting some kind of 'HAHA U HAZ BEEN
> > HACKED' notice to let you know about it. Those are the _nice_ hackers.
>
> Well they usually DO some
On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 19:12 -0500, Ian Pilcher wrote:
> On 04/17/2012 07:02 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Tue, 2012-04-17 at 18:13 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote:
> >> (but why is it *always* broken in Alphas? :-).
> >
> > The clue is in the name ;)
>
> I disagree. Alphas obviously have bugs, but
On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 15:04 -0300, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> I know this doesn´t solve my problem, but I´m outraged.
In general, we expect an application to bring a suitable desktop file so
it is usable after you installed it. That is even part of the packaging
guidelines, last I checked.
If the
On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 18:13 +0100, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Not all hacks involve the attacker posting some kind of 'HAHA U HAZ BEEN
> HACKED' notice to let you know about it. Those are the _nice_ hackers.
Well they usually DO something with a machine they have 0wn3ed. No spam
spewing forth, no
On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 19:54 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 00:05:42 +0100
> Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> > If grub2 isn't designed to be chainloaded in that way, it isn't.
>
> But it is supposed to work. I've already added a pointer to
> an upstream bug fixed not too long ago where
On 04/17/2012 07:02 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-04-17 at 18:13 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote:
>> (but why is it *always* broken in Alphas? :-).
>
> The clue is in the name ;)
I disagree. Alphas obviously have bugs, but when the *same* bug (or
different bugs with the same symptoms) are p
On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 00:05:42 +0100
Adam Williamson wrote:
> If grub2 isn't designed to be chainloaded in that way, it isn't.
But it is supposed to work. I've already added a pointer to
an upstream bug fixed not too long ago where blocklist
booting was broken and the grub maintainers considered th
On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 16:39 -0500, Michael Hennebry wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Apr 2012, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2012-04-17 at 17:39 -0500, Michael Hennebry wrote:
> >> I've booted F16.
>
> >> My old-grub stanza:
> >> title chainload to sda
> >> kernel (hd1,1)/grub2/core.img
> >>
> >>
On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 14:40 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Adam Williamson (awill...@redhat.com) said:
> > On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 13:10 -0400, Jonathan Kamens wrote:
> >
> > > Yes, I'm aware of that, but that's not what I want.
> > >
> > > If it is the position of the Fedora developers that /run
On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 13:57 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote:
> > That's still notabug, I think. See my comment. Even if it wasn't, the
> > fault isn't anaconda's.
>
> Then the bug should be moved to grub2, because it sure is a bug.
If grub2 isn't designed to be chainloaded in that way, it isn't. Like I
I suppose since all that is installed on
the /dev/sdb1 LIVE partition is
LiveOS - 130.4 MB
syslinux - 29.4 MB
Properties: 159.9 MB used
5.2 GB free
Filesystem type:msdos
the /dev/sdb2 LIVE-REPO contains a 2.5 GB .iso file.
Properties: 2.5 GB used
On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 20:34 +0300, Tomi Leppikangas wrote:
> > If you want to do a one-step upgrade you could add
> > '--enablerepo=updates-testing' to the 'distro-sync' operation.
>
> Ok this makes sense. So this is "problem" only exists when F17 is in
> beta, when released distro-upgrade would
On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 14:27 -0300, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 13:00, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> >> Should I file a bug fix about this?
> >
> > No, you'd be wasting your time. It's hidden intentionally because it's
> > considered deprecated in GNOME 3. The GNOME devs don't li
On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 14:17 -0300, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 14:00, Felix Miata wrote:
> > Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 ** a11y rocks!
> >
> > Felix Miata *** http://fm.no-ip.com/
> > --
>
> Another OS/2 user joins the Fedora Family. I remember you from the
> OS/
On 04/18/2012 03:51 PM, Thomas Gilliard wrote:
> I just did a sucessful install to an external USB HD using a USB of
> Fedora-17-Beta-x86_64-DVD.iso
> -It only used the Install Repo on the DVD(USB)
>
> ./tools_livecd-iso-to-disk.sh --format --reset-mbr
> Fedora-17-Beta-x86_64-DVD.iso /dev/sdb1
>
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 10:48 PM, Jonathan Kamens wrote:
> On 04/18/2012 04:45 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
>
> It shows up in the file manager; it's not mounted.
>
> Why not?
>
> In F16, it was mounted.
>
> In Windows, it's mounted.
>
> In Mac OS, it's mounted.
>
> Why should F17 behave differently
I just did a sucessful install to an external USB HD using a USB of
Fedora-17-Beta-x86_64-DVD.iso
-It only used the Install Repo on the DVD(USB)
./tools_livecd-iso-to-disk.sh --format --reset-mbr
Fedora-17-Beta-x86_64-DVD.iso /dev/sdb1
1-)needed an 8GB USB formatted GPT format with /dev/sdb1 f
On Wed, 18 Apr 2012, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2012-04-17 at 17:39 -0500, Michael Hennebry wrote:
I've booted F16.
My old-grub stanza:
title chainload to sda
kernel (hd1,1)/grub2/core.img
As I didn't expect it to work, I only installed the minimal version.
There are a few things
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 16:13, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> So, I´d really appreciate if someone more knowledgeable about Xorg snafus
> would give me a generic recipe to get my system back to at least vesa mode.
>
> I guess booting from grub 2.0 in single user mode would be first right?
Okay the sile
On 04/18/2012 04:45 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> It shows up in the file manager; it's not mounted.
Why not?
In F16, it was mounted.
In Windows, it's mounted.
In Mac OS, it's mounted.
Why should F17 behave differently from F17 and from every other
mainstream OS people are familiar with?
What i
Richard Ryniker (ryni...@alum.mit.edu) said:
> >If I plug it in while I'm logged in, it shows up. I log out and log back in,
> >and it still shows up.
>
> >If I reboot, plug it in during GDM, and then log in... it shows up. Under
> >what circumstance does it not show up for you?
Aha, for this la
>If I plug it in while I'm logged in, it shows up. I log out and log back in,
>and it still shows up.
>If I reboot, plug it in during GDM, and then log in... it shows up. Under
>what circumstance does it not show up for you?
If your USB stick is plugged in before you boot your system, where does
The following Fedora 15 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-5631/phpMyAdmin-3.5.0-1.fc15
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-5805/samba-3.5.14-73.fc15.1
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-5822/gallery3-3
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 12:12, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> So, I´m running out of clues as to what to do. I´m curious if any of you
> running F17 with the testing repos experienced any hiccup wrt X not
> starting up?.
>
> If not, I´d really appreciate clues wrt how to get my system back to a
> worki
Three use cases in which in my opinion the behavior is clearly incorrect:
Case 1:
1. Put DVD in drive while logged in. DVD is mounted.
2. Reboot computer and log back in. DVD is not mounted. It should be.
Case 2:
1. Put DVD in drive before logging in. DVD is not mounted.
2. Log in. DVD is n
Adam Williamson (awill...@redhat.com) said:
> On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 13:10 -0400, Jonathan Kamens wrote:
>
> > Yes, I'm aware of that, but that's not what I want.
> >
> > If it is the position of the Fedora developers that /run/media/$USER
> > is the right place for stuff to be mounted, and I don
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 15:17, Frank Murphy wrote:
> No, just studied sw design for a bit.
:))
FC
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
On 18/04/12 19:15, Fernando Cassia wrote:
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 15:10, Frank Murphy mailto:frankl...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Unfortunately CUA is going (gone) the way of the DoDo
Hi Frank,
What, you read my rant? :)
http://news.techeye.net/software/software-gui-design-going-to-hell-in-a-ba
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 15:10, Frank Murphy wrote:
> Unfortunately CUA is going (gone) the way of the DoDo
Hi Frank,
What, you read my rant? :)
http://news.techeye.net/software/software-gui-design-going-to-hell-in-a-basket
FC
--
During times of Universal Deceit, telling the truth becomes a
>
> On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 12:22 -0400, David wrote:
> > On 4/18/2012 11:11 AM, Dan Mashal wrote:
> > > My system is secure. Thanks for your concern.
> > >
> > Fedora 14 is EOL since one month after Fedora 16. Fedora 15 will be EOL
> > one month after Fedora 17. A long time with no security patches
On 18/04/12 19:07, Fernando Cassia wrote:
It has worked that way from the OS/2 Workplace Shell (whose paradigm
was ´everything is an object´) to Windows, too... (and previous Gnome
versions).
Unfortunately CUA is going (gone) the way of the DoDo
--
Regards,
Frank
"Jack of all, fubars"
--
te
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 14:48, Richard Ryniker wrote:
> I do not think a click on nothing is persuasively intuative as a way to
> create an application launcher.
Right clicking over something to obtain a pop-up menu of actions to
perform on it is an almost universal metaphor in the GUI world. If
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 14:59, Joachim Backes
wrote:
> I think that should be done by alacarte, but it's broken actually.
Joachim,
I appreciate your reply, and don´t get me wrong, but anybody else
understands how counter-intuititive this whole thing is?. Why need to
call an external program to
On 04/18/2012 07:56 PM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 14:48, Richard Ryniker wrote:
>> I suspect your concern may be for an easy way to add new programs
>> to the Applications function, which is a more obscure matter. Something
>> that creates a .desktop file in the right way,
> That's still notabug, I think. See my comment. Even if it wasn't, the
> fault isn't anaconda's.
Then the bug should be moved to grub2, because it sure is a bug.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 14:48, Richard Ryniker wrote:
> I suspect your concern may be for an easy way to add new programs
> to the Applications function, which is a more obscure matter. Something
> that creates a .desktop file in the right way, perhaps?
Exactly.
FC
--
During times of Universa
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 05:55, Jan Wildeboer wrote:
> On 18.04.2012 07:46, Fernando Cassia wrote:
>> Am I missing something obvious?
> Run program, right-click entry in sidebar, click Add to Favorites, perhaps?
> Jan
who mentioned favorites??
Let me repeat:
I download a Java app for instance. A
>But no, right clicking on empty space doesn't do diddly squat in the
>Gnome 3 Applications screen.
I do not think a click on nothing is persuasively intuative as a way to
create an application launcher.
Who wants diddly squats littering the screen, anyway?
For programs that can be found through
Adam Williamson wrote:
>> I did test upgrade with yum following info on
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upgrading_Fedora_using_yum
>>
>> After doing succesfull usrmove i did upgrade with:
>> yum --releasever=17 update rpm
>> rm -f /var/lib/rpm/__*
>> rpm --rebuilddb
>> yum --releasever=17 distro-
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Felix Miata wrote:
> On 2012/04/18 09:42 (GMT-0700) Tommy Pham composed:
>
>> Tried a i386 F17 Beta on an old Dell Optiplex GX280 machine here at
>> work and works fine. However my new upgraded home machine fails :(
>
>
>> Hardware info:
>
>
>> * Gigabyte GA-990F
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 13:00, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> Should I file a bug fix about this?
>
> No, you'd be wasting your time. It's hidden intentionally because it's
> considered deprecated in GNOME 3. The GNOME devs don't like the whole
> session handling stuff and consider it fundamentally t
I can upgrade. I know how to.
It's actually a Virtualbox VM running on a quad core AMD box with 16GB of
RAM.
Yes, it is natted.
Yes SSH is open to the internet.
Yes nginx is open to the internet.
Yes other ports are open to the internet.
No I've never gotten hacked.
Any other questions?
Tha
On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 13:10 -0400, Jonathan Kamens wrote:
> Yes, I'm aware of that, but that's not what I want.
>
> If it is the position of the Fedora developers that /run/media/$USER
> is the right place for stuff to be mounted, and I don't have a
> particular problem with that decision, then I
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 14:00, Felix Miata wrote:
> Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 ** a11y rocks!
>
> Felix Miata *** http://fm.no-ip.com/
> --
Another OS/2 user joins the Fedora Family. I remember you from the
OS/2 lists Felix, welcome. :)
FC
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproj
On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 12:05 -0500, John Morris wrote:
> It is behind a NAT on a home network so I don't worry too much about it
> getting hacked. Firefox is almost certainly vulnerable but you rarely
> see active attacks in the wild against Linux browsers, especially if you
> don't hang out at do
On Wed, 2012-03-14 at 18:03 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-03-13 at 06:04 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote:
>
> > One remark to this paragraph:
> >
> > > It is theoretically possible that the situation could arise where
> > > a release candidate is requested and built, and results in multip
On 04/18/2012 01:06 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> If you set a specific mount location for a device in that tool - i.e. in
> fstab - it will be used even if the device is connected after login.
Yes, I'm aware of that, but that's not what I want.
If it is the position of the Fedora developers that /
On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 12:15 -0400, Jonathan Kamens wrote:
> OK, so I took a look at the GNOME "Disks" utility, which I was finally
> able to get to run without crashing, and as far as I can tell, it
> doesn't resolve my main complaint with the new F17 behavior.
>
> Yes, I can use the Disks utility
On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 12:22 -0400, David wrote:
> On 4/18/2012 11:11 AM, Dan Mashal wrote:
> > My system is secure. Thanks for your concern.
> >
> Fedora 14 is EOL since one month after Fedora 16. Fedora 15 will be EOL
> one month after Fedora 17. A long time with no security patches of any
> kind
On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 09:42 -0700, Tommy Pham wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 1:14 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Tue, 2012-04-17 at 09:50 -0700, Tommy Pham wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Has anyone tried the recent beta released on DVD?
> >
> > Yes.
> >
> >> Does it give
> >> various install optio
On 2012/04/18 09:42 (GMT-0700) Tommy Pham composed:
Tried a i386 F17 Beta on an old Dell Optiplex GX280 machine here at
work and works fine. However my new upgraded home machine fails :(
Hardware info:
* Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD5 AM3+ AMD 990FX SATA 6Gb/s USB 3.0 ATX
* 3ware 9650SE-8LPML wit
I know Fedora 14 is EOL.
And sorry, I'm not that type. Try again.
Dan
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 9:55 AM, Rick Stevens
wrote:
> On 04/18/2012 09:22 AM, David wrote:
>
>> On 4/18/2012 11:11 AM, Dan Mashal wrote:
>>
>>> My system is secure. Thanks for your concern.
>>>
>>> Dan
>>>
>>
>>
>> Fedora 14
On 04/18/2012 09:22 AM, David wrote:
On 4/18/2012 11:11 AM, Dan Mashal wrote:
My system is secure. Thanks for your concern.
Dan
Fedora 14 is EOL since one month after Fedora 16. Fedora 15 will be EOL
one month after Fedora 17. A long time with no security patches of any
kind for any package
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 1:14 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-04-17 at 09:50 -0700, Tommy Pham wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Has anyone tried the recent beta released on DVD?
>
> Yes.
>
>> Does it give
>> various install options like F16?
>
> Yes.
>
>> The alpha F17 only installed bare
>> minimal
On 4/18/2012 11:11 AM, Dan Mashal wrote:
> My system is secure. Thanks for your concern.
>
> Dan
Fedora 14 is EOL since one month after Fedora 16. Fedora 15 will be EOL
one month after Fedora 17. A long time with no security patches of any
kind for any package for you.
I know the type. 'I use L
On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 08:06 -0700, Dan Mashal wrote:
> For what? Everything works fine.
For you, and for all those other people you're kindly allowing access to
your box...=)
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happ
OK, so I took a look at the GNOME "Disks" utility, which I was finally
able to get to run without crashing, and as far as I can tell, it
doesn't resolve my main complaint with the new F17 behavior.
Yes, I can use the Disks utility to configure removable devices, e.g.,
my DVD drive, to mount on sta
On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 01:49 -0700, Dan Mashal wrote:
> Well that's an Anaconda bug isn't it? :)
>
>
> Still not a reason for a rolling release.
Why is it a bug at all? Why wouldn't you want that?
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adam
On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 04:44 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Apr 2012 00:56:04 -0700
> Dan Mashal wrote:
>
> > I never had any issues with the DVD alpha or beta minus btrfs.
> >
> > Did you do any custom partitioning?
>
> My problems came way before partitioning. It simply couldn't
> find
On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 02:11 -0300, Fernando Cassia wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 00:09, Fernando Cassia
> wrote:
> So, Why-oh-why doesn't 'startup applications' appear in the
> list of apps under "system tools" or in the "System settings"
> folder view, specificall
On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 10:23 +0200, Stijn Hoop wrote:
> 2. "I have a plugged-in USB disk and I am at the physical console
>however I need to find the name of my USB disk in the folder list
>and click on it before I can use any files on it"
>
> This is what I personally object to, and I sus
On Tue, 2012-04-17 at 17:39 -0500, Michael Hennebry wrote:
> I've booted F16.
>
> On Tue, 17 Apr 2012, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> > See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804835 .
> >
> > As we understand it at present, you can't 'chainload' grub2 that way.
> > The correct way to 'chainl
Folks,
All was well with my F17 system until yesterday night when I did a yum
update and rebooted.
Now, I get the Fedora logo ¨filling up¨ until it switches to text mode and
I see it shows
"started display manager" and hangs there.
Of course I can log-in in text mode via ctrl-alt-f2, but for some
My system is secure. Thanks for your concern.
Dan
-Original Message-
From: test-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[mailto:test-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of David
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2012 8:10 AM
To: test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: Re: F17 Beta DVD install opti
On 4/18/2012 11:06 AM, Dan Mashal wrote:
> For what? Everything works fine.
>
> Dan
For the security of your system?
> -Original Message-
> From: test-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> [mailto:test-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Josh Boyer
> Sent: Wednesday, April 18,
For what? Everything works fine.
Dan
-Original Message-
From: test-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[mailto:test-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Josh Boyer
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2012 4:52 AM
To: For testing and quality assurance of Fedora releases
Subject: Re: F17 Beta
Compose started at Wed Apr 18 08:15:05 UTC 2012
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[389-ds-base]
389-ds-base-1.2.11-0.1.a1.fc18.x86_64 requires libdb-5.2.so()(64bit)
[aeolus-conductor]
aeolus-conductor-0.4.0-2.fc17.noarch requires ruby
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 4:49 AM, Dan Mashal wrote:
> Well that's an Anaconda bug isn't it? :)
>
> Still not a reason for a rolling release.
>
> I quite enjoy Fedora 14.
Please, if you do nothing else, upgrade your kernel manually.
josh
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubs
Compose started at Wed Apr 18 08:15:05 UTC 2012
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[aeolus-conductor]
aeolus-conductor-0.4.0-2.fc17.noarch requires ruby(abi) = 0:1.8
[aeolus-configserver]
aeolus-configserver-0.4.5-1.fc17.noarch require
> On Tue, 2012-04-17 at 08:42 -0700, Brian C. Lane wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 12:08:04PM +0100, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2012-04-16 at 10:11 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote:
> > >
> > > > > [1] "The installer must boot (if appropriate) and run on all
> > > > > primary
> > > > > archit
Ok, will test tomorrow.
Dan
-Original Message-
From: test-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[mailto:test-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Tom Horsley
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2012 2:01 AM
To: test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: Re: Hey! Hard disk install of DVD iso works!
On 18.04.2012 07:46, Fernando Cassia wrote:
Am I missing something obvious?
Run program, right-click entry in sidebar, click Add to Favorites, perhaps?
Jan
--
Jan H Wildeboer|
EMEA Open Source Affairs | Office: +49 (0)89 205071-207
Red Hat GmbH | Mobi
On Wed, 18 Apr 2012 01:46:54 -0700
Dan Mashal wrote:
> Just use whatever the default options are for upgrading or "replace
> existing linux system" with all default options for now,
> That should do it.
I'm not upgrading. I'm installing from scratch in a different
partition.
--
test mailing list
Well that's an Anaconda bug isn't it? :)
Still not a reason for a rolling release.
I quite enjoy Fedora 14.
Thanks,
Dan
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 1:48 AM, Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Apr 2012 01:06:42 -0700
> Dan Mashal wrote:
>
> > You can install updates during the initial OS install. Jus
On Wed, 18 Apr 2012 01:06:42 -0700
Dan Mashal wrote:
> You can install updates during the initial OS install. Just select updates
> and updates-testing repo. You will need network when you do this.
You can do that, but then you find you can't restrict the install
to packages only appearing on the
Just use whatever the default options are for upgrading or "replace
existing linux system" with all default options for now,
That should do it.
I will double check tomorrow for you.
Dan
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 1:44 AM, Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Apr 2012 00:56:04 -0700
> Dan Mashal wrote:
On Wed, 18 Apr 2012 00:56:04 -0700
Dan Mashal wrote:
> I never had any issues with the DVD alpha or beta minus btrfs.
>
> Did you do any custom partitioning?
My problems came way before partitioning. It simply couldn't
find the disk image given on the repo=hd:yadda-yadda kernel
command line. Wit
Hello,
On Mon, 16 Apr 2012 15:50:47 -0400
Jonathan Kamens wrote:
> I am not talking about static mounts. I'm talking about if I have a
> removable device inserted / plugged in / whatever, then when I log
> in, I should see it. This is what users expect. Period.
>
> Bugzillad: https://bugzilla.r
You can install updates during the initial OS install. Just select updates
and updates-testing repo. You will need network when you do this.
So why do we need a "rolling release" again?
Dan
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 8:02 PM, John Wendel wrote:
> On 04/17/2012 01:43 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On
I just installed the F17 Beta from DVD in a VBox VM. After installing and
updating I
went to "Install Guest Additions". The CD image was mounted and then a dialog
box
popped up to inform that the CD had software on it that wanted to run when the
CD was
loaded. But the dialog box was grayed ou
I never had any issues with the DVD alpha or beta minus btrfs.
Did you do any custom partitioning?
Dan
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 5:02 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-04-17 at 18:13 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote:
> > Unlike the Alpha DVD iso, I was able to install f17
> > Beta using the hard
93 matches
Mail list logo
