Greetings,
Today is the another test day for Fedora 17 Beefy Miracle. All the events
take place in #fedora-test-day on Freenode IRC.
As always, the more testing we can get, the better. Kernel developers and QA
team members will be on hand to help with testing and debugging.
The testing is easy
On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 18:09 -0600, Peter Gueckel wrote:
> Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> > Could you try one?
>
> I have to pay when I go over my monthly GB download limit.
>
> > [EFI]'s a system firmware level thing.
>
> That's what I thought, but, having googled it numerous times, it seems to be
Adam Williamson wrote:
> Could you try one?
I have to pay when I go over my monthly GB download limit.
> [EFI]'s a system firmware level thing.
That's what I thought, but, having googled it numerous times, it seems to be
quite mysterious, still, and straight answers are hard to come by.
--
On Mon, 2012-03-12 at 17:09 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Adamwill/Draft_QA_Fedora_17_Install_Results_Template
>
> Unless anyone comes up with a bright idea to do this better, I'll go
> ahead and put it into practice ahead of TC2. Thanks!
Well, I lied about
On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 14:31 -0600, Peter Gueckel wrote:
> Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> > Do early 17 DVDs work for you? Have you tried?
>
> This is the first Fedora 17 disk I have tried.
>
> > The 17 Beta TCs should still be available at stage/, and the
> > Alpha is of course available 'officially
On Wed, 2012-02-22 at 13:35 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 08:04 -0500, Josef Skladanka wrote:
> > This testcase [1] should ensure, that if the user uses LiveCD tools to
> > transfer the Fedora Live.iso to USB stick, the boot process works 'as
> > expected'.
> >
> > I prop
The various install repository _default tests aside from DVD and
mirrorlist (which don't require explicit repo selection) -
HTTP/FTP_default , NFS_default, NFSISO_default, Hard_drive_default - all
rely on the 'askmethod' parameter which used to bring up an interactive
list of possible repository lo
Adam Williamson wrote:
> Do early 17 DVDs work for you? Have you tried?
This is the first Fedora 17 disk I have tried.
> The 17 Beta TCs should still be available at stage/, and the
> Alpha is of course available 'officially'.
I didn't bother with any of the alphas. Particularly, because of the
On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 13:32 -0600, Peter Gueckel wrote:
> Peter Gueckel wrote:
>
> > Adam Williamson wrote:
> >
> >> Did you checksum it?
> >
> > No, I know I should have, but I didn't. I was too lazy to check.
> >
>
> OK. I finally bothered to checksum it and it is OK.
Bit confused then, rea
Peter Gueckel wrote:
> Adam Williamson wrote:
>
>> Did you checksum it?
>
> No, I know I should have, but I didn't. I was too lazy to check.
>
OK. I finally bothered to checksum it and it is OK.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org
Adam Williamson wrote:
> Did you checksum it?
No, I know I should have, but I didn't. I was too lazy to check.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
The following Fedora 15 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-3414/python-sqlalchemy0.5-0.5.8-9.fc15
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-4417/mingw-libtasn1-2.12-1.fc15
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-4
The following Fedora 16 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-3412/python-sqlalchemy0.5-0.5.8-9.fc16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-4409/mingw-libtasn1-2.12-1.fc16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-4
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 7:26 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
> This bug casually mentions that an app (swell-foop) menu has
> moved from the app itself to the gnome-shell panel:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=803430#c4
>
> My reaction to this is "What in the $#@! is going on?!?".
>
> Is gn
Sorry - that was supposed to be a private message.
On 03/26/2012 10:34 AM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
See figure.1 -- nothing new under the Sun since VAX/VMS
On 03/26/2012 10:26 AM, Tom Horsley wrote:
This bug casually mentions that an app (swell-foop) menu has
moved from the app it
See figure.1 -- nothing new under the Sun since VAX/VMS
On 03/26/2012 10:26 AM, Tom Horsley wrote:
This bug casually mentions that an app (swell-foop) menu has
moved from the app itself to the gnome-shell panel:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=803430#c4
My reaction to this is "Wha
This bug casually mentions that an app (swell-foop) menu has
moved from the app itself to the gnome-shell panel:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=803430#c4
My reaction to this is "What in the $#@! is going on?!?".
Is gnome 3 now being turned into ubuntu unity where
no apps have menu b
* Michael Schwendt [2012-03-26 12:29]:
> On Mon, 26 Mar 2012 12:18:38 -0400, DB (Deepak) wrote:
>
> > * Frank Murphy [2012-03-26 12:13]:
> > > On 26/03/12 17:03, Deepak Bhole wrote:
> > >
> > > >Bug against rkhunter or the Java (OpenJDK) package? AFAIK none of the
> > > >OpenJDK packages create
On 26/03/12 17:18, Deepak Bhole wrote:
Weird. It is not on my system. Not listed here either:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=2879224
it is as /lib is now /usr/lib since convertfs
filed bz against rkh
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=806972
--
Regards,
Frank
"Jac
On Mon, 26 Mar 2012 12:18:38 -0400, DB (Deepak) wrote:
> * Frank Murphy [2012-03-26 12:13]:
> > On 26/03/12 17:03, Deepak Bhole wrote:
> >
> > >Bug against rkhunter or the Java (OpenJDK) package? AFAIK none of the
> > >OpenJDK packages create /lib/java . Might be worth looking into what
> > >doe
* Frank Murphy [2012-03-26 12:13]:
> On 26/03/12 17:03, Deepak Bhole wrote:
>
> >Bug against rkhunter or the Java (OpenJDK) package? AFAIK none of the
> >OpenJDK packages create /lib/java . Might be worth looking into what
> >does (rpm -qf).
> >
> rpm -qf /lib/java
> jpackage-utils-1.7.5-16.fc17.
On 26/03/12 17:03, Deepak Bhole wrote:
Bug against rkhunter or the Java (OpenJDK) package? AFAIK none of the
OpenJDK packages create /lib/java . Might be worth looking into what
does (rpm -qf).
rpm -qf /lib/java
jpackage-utils-1.7.5-16.fc17.i686
--
Regards,
Frank
"Jack of all, fubars"
--
test
* Frank Murphy [2012-03-26 12:00]:
> 16:46:00] Warning: Checking for possible rootkit files and
> directories [ Warning ]
> [16:46:00] Found directory '/lib/java'. Possible rootkit:
> Rootkit component
>
>
> rkhunter-1.3.8-14.fc17.noarch
>
> As /lib/java is empty, guessing false positi
16:46:00] Warning: Checking for possible rootkit files and directories [
Warning ]
[16:46:00] Found directory '/lib/java'. Possible rootkit:
Rootkit component
rkhunter-1.3.8-14.fc17.noarch
As /lib/java is empty, guessing false positive.
Is it worth filing a bz.
--
Regards,
Frank
"J
On Sat, 2012-03-24 at 11:58 -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> Here's a strange pathology that just bit me for the first time in a while,
> though I've seen it before. I'm not sure where to file a bug on this
> one...
There's several levels of "X locked up" pathology, let's see if I can
shed some li
#282: Test Day proposal - ABRT & deduplication service
---+---
Reporter: rmarko| Owner:
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 17
Component: Test Day |Version:
Resolution:| Keywo
Please join us on irc.freenode.net in #fedora-meeting-1 for this
important meeting. Will the Beefy Miracle live up to the latter half of
its name? Attend this meeting and find out! :)
Wednesday, March 28, 2012 @21:00 UTC (17:00 EDT/14:00 PDT)
"Before each public release Development, QA and Rel
#282: Test Day proposal - ABRT & deduplication service
---+---
Reporter: rmarko| Owner:
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 17
Component: Test Day |Version:
Resolution:| Keywo
On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 10:04:26PM +0100, Sven Lankes wrote:
> I don't think so. Installing a new dracut is a prerequiste for the
> convertfs step.
For reference:
This update:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dracut-013-22.fc16
fixed the issue for me.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/sho
Compose started at Mon Mar 26 08:15:04 UTC 2012
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[HippoDraw]
HippoDraw-devel-1.21.3-2.fc17.i686 requires python-numarray
HippoDraw-devel-1.21.3-2.fc17.x86_64 requires python-numarray
HippoDraw-
On 03/26/2012 03:31 AM, Peter Gueckel wrote:
Then the computer rebooted, read the DVD, said it would boot it in 3 seconds,
then a message appeared in the upper left corner about "trying to allocate 1135
pages... for vmlinuz" (I think it said).
Sounds like a kernel bug so go and file it.
You pr
31 matches
Mail list logo
