On Sat, 2012-03-24 at 19:32 -0700, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
> X wedged on me again while I was running Gnome.
> I rebooted and started Xfce. It wedged after some minutes.
>
> I then installed the current Nvidia proprietary driver. The computer
> has not
> wedged for a few hours. Thi
On Sat, 2012-03-24 at 21:09 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 03/24/2012 08:34 PM, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> > On Sat, 24 Mar 2012 12:23:26 -0700
> > Adam Williamson wrote:
> >
> >> Jonathan, Chuck - if you try holding down a key that ought to do
> >> something for half a second instead of
X wedged on me again while I was running Gnome.
I rebooted and started Xfce. It wedged after some minutes.
I then installed the current Nvidia proprietary driver. The computer
has not
wedged for a few hours. This suggests the problem lies
with the default X server for my GTX 460SE ... or an
> Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2012 19:37:38 -0300
> Subject: Re: Weird rawhide desktop behavior
> From: look...@gmail.com
> To: test@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
> On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 2:58 PM, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> > Here's a strange pathology that just bit me for the first time in a while,
> > thoug
The following Fedora 15 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-3414/python-sqlalchemy0.5-0.5.8-9.fc15
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-4417/mingw-libtasn1-2.12-1.fc15
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-4
The following Fedora 16 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-3412/python-sqlalchemy0.5-0.5.8-9.fc16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-4409/mingw-libtasn1-2.12-1.fc16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-4
On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 2:58 PM, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> Here's a strange pathology that just bit me for the first time in a while,
> though I've seen it before. I'm not sure where to file a bug on this
> one...
>
> In short: I'll be working away, minding my own business, when the desktop
> goes
On 03/24/2012 08:34 PM, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
On Sat, 24 Mar 2012 12:23:26 -0700
Adam Williamson wrote:
Jonathan, Chuck - if you try holding down a key that ought to do
something for half a second instead of just pressing it, does it work?
I'll try that next time the problem hits. I don't h
On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 08:57:38PM +, Peter Robinson wrote:
Hi Peter,
> Your missing the convertfs section which involves the steps dealing
> with grub configs and rebooting.
I don't think so. Installing a new dracut is a prerequiste for the
convertfs step.
--
sven === jabber/xmpp: s...@la
On Sat, 24 Mar 2012 11:58:15 -0600
Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> Here's a strange pathology that just bit me for the first time in a
> while, though I've seen it before. I'm not sure where to file a bug
> on this one...
>
> In short: I'll be working away, minding my own business, when the
> desktop
On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 8:35 PM, Sven Lankes wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I just tried updating an up-to-date F16 install to F17 according to
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upgrading_Fedora_using_yum#Fedora_16_-.3E_Fedora_17
>
> # yum --releasever=17 update dracut
>
> tries to update filesystem to 3-2.fc17
On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 09:35:52PM +0100, Sven Lankes wrote:
> # yum --releasever=17 update dracut
Note: I did install rpm on it's own because doing the "update dracut
rpm" failed the same way.
Versions installed:
[root@machine tmp]# rpm -qa rpm dracut
rpm-4.9.1.2-14.fc17.x86_64
dracut-013-20.f
Hi!
I just tried updating an up-to-date F16 install to F17 according to
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upgrading_Fedora_using_yum#Fedora_16_-.3E_Fedora_17
# yum --releasever=17 update dracut
tries to update filesystem to 3-2.fc17 which contains the safeguard
against running on a non-USRMOVE conv
On Sat, 24 Mar 2012 12:23:26 -0700
Adam Williamson wrote:
> Jonathan, Chuck - if you try holding down a key that ought to do
> something for half a second instead of just pressing it, does it work?
I'll try that next time the problem hits. I don't have any real way to
provoke it now, though, so
On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 7:24 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-03-24 at 12:21 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
>> I pretty much agree, every time we've talked about it we've figured
>> there's not actually a whole lot that needs to be done. The biggest
>> thing really is to make sure there
On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 7:21 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-03-24 at 16:37 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
>> On 03/24/2012 04:22 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> > That's not entirely true, in the short term we likely won't use
>> > anaconda, in the medium to long term we plan to use
On Sat, 2012-03-24 at 12:21 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> I pretty much agree, every time we've talked about it we've figured
> there's not actually a whole lot that needs to be done. The biggest
> thing really is to make sure there are people with every supported ARM
> target device who are wil
On Sat, 2012-03-24 at 11:43 -0700, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
> On 03/24/2012 11:12 AM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> > On 03/24/2012 05:58 PM, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> >> Here's a strange pathology that just bit me for the first time in a
> >> while,
> >> though I've seen it before.
On Sat, 2012-03-24 at 16:37 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 03/24/2012 04:22 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > That's not entirely true, in the short term we likely won't use
> > anaconda, in the medium to long term we plan to use anacona
> > exclusively, whether that be on the server style
On Sat, 2012-03-24 at 16:22 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 03/24/2012 03:55 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > The big difference is that ARM doesn't currently use, or plan to use,
> > anaconda for deployment. They work by building images specific to
> > particular target devices, which you
On 03/24/2012 11:12 AM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
On 03/24/2012 05:58 PM, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
Here's a strange pathology that just bit me for the first time in a
while,
though I've seen it before. I'm not sure where to file a bug on this
one...
In short: I'll be working away, minding
On 03/24/2012 05:58 PM, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
Here's a strange pathology that just bit me for the first time in a while,
though I've seen it before. I'm not sure where to file a bug on this
one...
In short: I'll be working away, minding my own business, when the desktop
goes completely dead -
Here's a strange pathology that just bit me for the first time in a while,
though I've seen it before. I'm not sure where to file a bug on this
one...
In short: I'll be working away, minding my own business, when the desktop
goes completely dead - no response to any key or mouse events. That sai
The following Fedora 17 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-3373/python-sqlalchemy0.5-0.5.8-9.fc17
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-4451/mingw-libtasn1-2.12-1.fc17
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-4
On 03/24/2012 04:22 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
That's not entirely true, in the short term we likely won't use
anaconda, in the medium to long term we plan to use anacona
exclusively, whether that be on the server style hardware using
traditional install methods (gui, text or kickstart) or to buil
On 03/24/2012 03:55 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
The big difference is that ARM doesn't currently use, or plan to use,
anaconda for deployment. They work by building images specific to
particular target devices, which you just dump onto the device and then
boot.
Which only means that the relevant
On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-03-24 at 13:00 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
>> On 03/23/2012 09:36 PM, Paul Whalen wrote:
>> > A ticket was previously opened up to address the issue of incorporating
>> > ARM into the existing QA tests
>> > (http://
On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 3:14 AM, John Reiser wrote:
> On 03/23/2012 02:36 PM, Paul Whalen wrote [has been snipped]:
>
>> We have recently opened up discussions with developers and the community,
>> engaging in a variety of topics to understand the requirements of moving
>> the ARM secondary arch t
On Sat, 2012-03-24 at 13:00 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 03/23/2012 09:36 PM, Paul Whalen wrote:
> > A ticket was previously opened up to address the issue of incorporating ARM
> > into the existing QA tests (http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/277),
> > and begin the discussio
# LXDE; Gnome; KDE; sugar; Xfce installed [1]
Running Sugar-Desktop :KDE DaemonSecretService keeps popping up, does not save
password
- Telepathy Authentication Handler pops up in sugar-desktop asks Password for
KDE Wallet then for Jabber Password which is direct conflict with
jabber.sugarlabs
On 03/23/2012 09:36 PM, Paul Whalen wrote:
A ticket was previously opened up to address the issue of incorporating ARM
into the existing QA tests (http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/277), and
begin the discussion of what work is still needed. I would like to revisit this
on the mailing l
Compose started at Sat Mar 24 08:15:03 UTC 2012
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[HippoDraw]
HippoDraw-devel-1.21.3-2.fc17.i686 requires python-numarray
HippoDraw-devel-1.21.3-2.fc17.x86_64 requires python-numarray
HippoDraw-
32 matches
Mail list logo
