On Fri, 2012-03-23 at 23:02 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-03-24 at 05:47 +, Andre Robatino wrote:
> > Adam Williamson redhat.com> writes:
> >
> > > On Fri, 2012-03-23 at 20:24 -0400, Andre Robatino wrote:
> > > > The DVD no longer offers to do a mediacheck (I haven't checked th
On Sat, 2012-03-24 at 05:47 +, Andre Robatino wrote:
> Adam Williamson redhat.com> writes:
>
> > On Fri, 2012-03-23 at 20:24 -0400, Andre Robatino wrote:
> > > The DVD no longer offers to do a mediacheck (I haven't checked the
> > > behavior of the live images). Is this reported?
> >
> > A q
Adam Williamson redhat.com> writes:
> On Fri, 2012-03-23 at 20:24 -0400, Andre Robatino wrote:
> > The DVD no longer offers to do a mediacheck (I haven't checked the
> > behavior of the live images). Is this reported?
>
> A quick search of bugz.fedoraproject.org/anaconda doesn't show anything
>
On Fri, 2012-03-23 at 20:24 -0400, Andre Robatino wrote:
> The DVD no longer offers to do a mediacheck (I haven't checked the
> behavior of the live images). Is this reported?
A quick search of bugz.fedoraproject.org/anaconda doesn't show anything
relevant, so I'm guessing 'no' - can you report it
On Fri, 2012-03-23 at 20:14 -0700, John Reiser wrote:
> On 03/23/2012 02:36 PM, Paul Whalen wrote [has been snipped]:
>
> > We have recently opened up discussions with developers and the community,
> > engaging in a variety of topics to understand the requirements of moving
> > the ARM secondary a
On 03/23/2012 02:36 PM, Paul Whalen wrote [has been snipped]:
> We have recently opened up discussions with developers and the community,
> engaging in a variety of topics to understand the requirements of moving
> the ARM secondary arch to primary ( details
> -https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Feat
The following Fedora 15 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-3414/python-sqlalchemy0.5-0.5.8-9.fc15
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-4417/mingw-libtasn1-2.12-1.fc15
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-3
The DVD no longer offers to do a mediacheck (I haven't checked the
behavior of the live images). Is this reported?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
+infinity :-)
--
Jan H Wildeboer|
EMEA Open Source Affairs | Office: +49 (0)89 205071-207
Red Hat GmbH | Mobile: +49 (0)174 33 23 249
Technopark II, Haus C | Fax:+49 (0)89 205071-111
Werner-von-Siemens-Ring 11 -15 |
85630 Grasbrunn
Good day,
By way of introduction - I'm Paul Whalen, recently hired by Red Hat to look at
introducing QA testing for Fedora ARM. I have been working in the ARM space
since Seneca College took on the task of hosting the Fedoa Koji Build System in
May of 2010.
With an increase of consumer and soo
As per the Fedora 17 schedule [1], Fedora 17 Beta Release Candidate 1
(RC1) is now available for testing. Content information, including
changes, can be found at https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5141 .
Please see the following pages for download links (including delta ISOs)
and testing instr
Hey, everyone. I'm sorry this is late, my bad for not getting it up
earlier. :(
The Retrospective page for Fedora 17 QA is now up:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_17_QA_Retrospective
We use the retrospective page to track things that went well and things
that didn't go so well during the F
On Fri, 2012-03-23 at 19:21 +0100, Joachim Backes wrote:
> On 03/23/2012 07:02 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Fri, 2012-03-23 at 10:06 +0100, Joachim Backes wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> after having updated to gnome-shell-3.3.92-1.fc17.x86_64 (included in
> >> the todays updates) and restarting gno
On 03/23/2012 07:02 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-03-23 at 10:06 +0100, Joachim Backes wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> after having updated to gnome-shell-3.3.92-1.fc17.x86_64 (included in
>> the todays updates) and restarting gnome-shell with alt+f2->r, the
>> desktop is mangled: a second nautilus
On Fri, 2012-03-23 at 09:43 -0700, Tom London wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 9:28 AM, Joachim Backes
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm running inside F17 VirtualBox-4.1-4.1.10_76795_fedora16-1.x86_64
> > from virtualbox.org flawlessly until today morning. But after having
> > applied all F17 updates
On Fri, 2012-03-23 at 10:06 +0100, Joachim Backes wrote:
> Hi,
>
> after having updated to gnome-shell-3.3.92-1.fc17.x86_64 (included in
> the todays updates) and restarting gnome-shell with alt+f2->r, the
> desktop is mangled: a second nautilus desktop window is appears on the
> screen, shifted f
On Fri, 2012-03-23 at 07:15 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 02:17:46 -0600,
>Tim Flink wrote:
> >Since there is only one currently proposed blocker and F17 beta RC1
> >should land sometime Friday, there isn't much point in having a blocker
> >meeting.
> >
> >Instead, pl
On 03/23/2012 05:43 PM, Tom London wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 9:28 AM, Joachim Backes
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm running inside F17 VirtualBox-4.1-4.1.10_76795_fedora16-1.x86_64
>> from virtualbox.org flawlessly until today morning. But after having
>> applied all F17 updates (a lot!!) and tr
The following Fedora 17 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-3373/python-sqlalchemy0.5-0.5.8-9.fc17
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-4451/mingw-libtasn1-2.12-1.fc17
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-4
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 9:28 AM, Joachim Backes
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm running inside F17 VirtualBox-4.1-4.1.10_76795_fedora16-1.x86_64
> from virtualbox.org flawlessly until today morning. But after having
> applied all F17 updates (a lot!!) and trying to start VirtualBox,
>
> 1. VirtualBox crashes
Hi,
I'm running inside F17 VirtualBox-4.1-4.1.10_76795_fedora16-1.x86_64
from virtualbox.org flawlessly until today morning. But after having
applied all F17 updates (a lot!!) and trying to start VirtualBox,
1. VirtualBox crashes immediately if starting the virtual machine
2. Immeditately after t
#290: Proposed Test Day - KDE 4.8
---+
Reporter: martix| Owner:
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 17
Component: Test Day |Version:
Resolution:| Keywords:
#290: Proposed Test Day - KDE 4.8
---+
Reporter: martix| Owner:
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 17
Component: Test Day |Version:
Resolution:| Keywords:
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 7:36 PM, Joshua Andrews wrote:
> I had packagekit to check for updates once a day but it seem like every 2
> minutes yumBackend.py is running using a lot of CPU.
>
> I set Packagekit to check for updates never and yumBackend.py is still at
> it.. I'd like to use my CPU for
> On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 02:17:46 -0600,
>Tim Flink wrote:
> >Since there is only one currently proposed blocker and F17 beta RC1
> >should land sometime Friday, there isn't much point in having a
> >blocker
> >meeting.
> >
> >Instead, please test beta RC1 once it lands. There are a lot of
>
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 02:17:46 -0600,
Tim Flink wrote:
Since there is only one currently proposed blocker and F17 beta RC1
should land sometime Friday, there isn't much point in having a blocker
meeting.
Instead, please test beta RC1 once it lands. There are a lot of
accepted blocker bugs -
Compose started at Fri Mar 23 08:15:06 UTC 2012
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[HippoDraw]
HippoDraw-devel-1.21.3-2.fc17.i686 requires python-numarray
HippoDraw-devel-1.21.3-2.fc17.x86_64 requires python-numarray
HippoDraw-
Hi,
after having updated to gnome-shell-3.3.92-1.fc17.x86_64 (included in
the todays updates) and restarting gnome-shell with alt+f2->r, the
desktop is mangled: a second nautilus desktop window is appears on the
screen, shifted from the left/top corner by about 1 inch.
Anybody sees this too?
Kin
Since there is only one currently proposed blocker and F17 beta RC1
should land sometime Friday, there isn't much point in having a blocker
meeting.
Instead, please test beta RC1 once it lands. There are a lot of
accepted blocker bugs - the fixes for them will need testing and
verification.
So, o
29 matches
Mail list logo
