#271: L10N and i18n Test Day
---+---
Reporter: aalam | Owner: jdulaney
Type: task | Status: assigned
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 17
Component: Test Day |Version:
Resolution:| Keywords:
Blocke
The following Fedora 17 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-2123/glibc-2.15-23.fc17
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-2187/krb5-1.10-4.fc17
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-1800/xulrunner-10.0.1-3.fc17
On 02/16/2012 10:42 PM, Ian Pilcher wrote:
> I'm willing to bet that I wouldn't be getting a "NameError: global name
> 'BRFSError' is not defined" traceback if it were. (BTRFSError anyone?)
Apparently it's not BTRFSError either.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=796013
--
=
#271: L10N and i18n Test Day
---+---
Reporter: aalam | Owner: jdulaney
Type: task | Status: assigned
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 17
Component: Test Day |Version:
Resolution:| Keywords:
Blocke
The following Fedora 16 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-0730/jetty-6.1.26-8.fc16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-2162/glibc-2.14.90-24.fc16.6
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-1268/drupal7-7.12-1.
The following Fedora 15 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-1283/drupal6-6.24-1.fc15
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-2144/glibc-2.14.1-6
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-0752/jetty-6.1.26-7.fc15
h
On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 16:03:30 -0800
Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
> RC4 installed unhandled exception on simple storage devices check.
> Unfortunately, upload of traceback failed also.
>
> RC3 did install on a different computer with just one hard disk.
Sounds kind of like https://bugzilla
RC4 installed unhandled exception on simple storage devices check.
Unfortunately, upload of traceback failed also.
RC3 did install on a different computer with just one hard disk.
--
Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R c...@omen.com www.omen.com
Developer of Industrial ZMODEM(Tm) for Embedded App
#271: L10N and i18n Test Day
---+---
Reporter: aalam | Owner: jdulaney
Type: task | Status: assigned
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 17
Component: Test Day |Version:
Resolution:| Keywords:
Blocke
On Tue, 2012-02-21 at 16:35 -0700, Michal Jaegermann wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 05:12:13PM -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
> > On Tue, 2012-02-21 at 13:10 -0700, Michal Jaegermann wrote:
> >
> > > Running 'LIBGL_ALWAYS_SOFTWARE=1 gnome-shell --replace', as proposed by
> > > drago01, indeed starts
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 05:12:13PM -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-02-21 at 13:10 -0700, Michal Jaegermann wrote:
>
> > Running 'LIBGL_ALWAYS_SOFTWARE=1 gnome-shell --replace', as proposed by
> > drago01, indeed starts an intended mode gnome session, both before and
> > after installing
On Tue, 2012-02-21 at 13:10 -0700, Michal Jaegermann wrote:
> Running 'LIBGL_ALWAYS_SOFTWARE=1 gnome-shell --replace', as proposed by
> drago01, indeed starts an intended mode gnome session, both before and
> after installing these scratch packages, but results are spectacularly
> useless. 'gnome-
On Thu, 2012-02-16 at 04:55 -0500, Kamil Paral wrote:
> > > 2. Ask Anaconda team to provide us with their "official" and
> > > supported solution.
> > >
> > > After inspecting updates.img, there is a lot of code copied from
> > > (some old version of) anaconda. That doesn't seem to me as a good
>
As per the Fedora 17 schedule [1], Fedora 17 Alpha Release Candidate 4
(RC4) is now available for testing. Content information, including
changes, can be found at https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5083 .
Please see the following pages for download links (including delta ISOs)
and testing inst
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 11:13:19AM -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-02-20 at 23:52 -0700, Michal Jaegermann wrote:
> > I am asking because on my rawhide installation
> > (Radeon RV280 graphics card) I am surely not observing anything of that
> > sort.
> Yeah, ugly corner case.
.
>
>
On Tue, 2012-02-21 at 13:10 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-02-21 at 12:08 -0500, mwesten wrote:
>
> > FYI - I can get the shell with this on RV200 in F17ARC2 (Live), but the
> > processor gets pegged at 100% continuously and it's not usable.
>
> Performance reports for software gnome-
On Tue, 2012-02-21 at 12:08 -0500, mwesten wrote:
> FYI - I can get the shell with this on RV200 in F17ARC2 (Live), but the
> processor gets pegged at 100% continuously and it's not usable.
Performance reports for software gnome-shell need to include the CPU
speed and model to be informative.
T
F17.Xfce 64bit
This is in messages:
Feb 21 19:37:37 testvm gnome-keyring-daemon[1596]: couldn't set
environment variable in session: The name org.gnome.SessionManager was
not provided by any .service files
Feb 21 19:37:37 testvm gnome-keyring-daemon[1596]: couldn't set
environment variable in ses
Kamil Paral redhat.com> writes:
> The new feature is implemented and should be part of the next anaconda release
(17.9 probably). We just use
> 'traceback' boot option. Once a new compose with the new anaconda is ready,
I'll re-write the test cases.
The 'traceback' boot option does NOT appear to
Hey, folks. Just another quick F17 Alpha status note.
I'm going to request an RC4 compose soon, to fix the following new
blocker:
http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=794835 "kde desktop
unresponsive in F17 virt-manager, compositing+llvmpipe too slow, not
ready"
We will also pull in these
Hello,
I just pushed fixed openldap to updates-testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/openldap-2.4.29-3.fc17
Please, test it and give it some karma! Especially SSSD users.
Thanks & Regards,
Jan
>
> Accepted NTH
>
>
> 6. http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771484
On 02/21/2012 05:14 AM, drago01 wrote:
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 7:52 AM, Michal Jaegermann wrote:
At https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Gnome_shell_software_rendering
I am reading "The standard Gnome 3 experience is now available on all
hardware". Is this a plan, a wish or this is supposed
On Mon, 2012-02-20 at 23:52 -0700, Michal Jaegermann wrote:
> At https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Gnome_shell_software_rendering
> I am reading "The standard Gnome 3 experience is now available on all
> hardware". Is this a plan, a wish or this is supposedly describing the
> current situati
As per the Fedora 17 schedule [1], Fedora 17 Alpha Release Candidate 3
(RC3) is now available for testing. Content information, including
changes, can be found at https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5083 .
Please see the following pages for download links (including delta ISOs)
and testing inst
#271: L10N and i18n Test Day
---+---
Reporter: aalam | Owner: jdulaney
Type: task | Status: assigned
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 17
Component: Test Day |Version:
Resolution:| Keywords:
Blocke
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 7:52 AM, Michal Jaegermann wrote:
> At https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Gnome_shell_software_rendering
> I am reading "The standard Gnome 3 experience is now available on all
> hardware". Is this a plan, a wish or this is supposedly describing the
> current situatio
This package is obsolete. Maintainer of Revisor hasn't worked on it for
year and lot of things changed since then. This package should be
removed from repositories.
On Mon, 2012-02-20 at 20:27 -0600, kevin martin wrote:
> Loks like you don't have the 32 bit version of anaconda installed and
> that
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 12:42 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-02-20 at 20:59 +0100, drago01 wrote:
>> We currently don't have any explicit criterion that mandates that
>> keyboard layouts choose in the installer should work in the installed
>> system.
>> As a maintainer of one of the pac
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 12:28:02PM -0500, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
> How do I get the numlock the turn off? (please don't tell me to
> press the NumLock key!! It doesn't work in rawhide right now. :-) )
Already fixed upstream:
http://git.gnome.org/browse/gnome-settings-daemon/commit/?id=ebca1ce128
29 matches
Mail list logo
