Hey, folks. Here's another Alpha status report, focusing on open
blocker/NTH issues and updates that need karma.
As always, https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Current_Release_Blockers lists
open blockers more or less in real time.
Here's a quick summary of requested actions for the impatient:
* anyo
The following Fedora 17 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-1800/xulrunner-10.0.1-3.fc17
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-1794/thunderbird-10.0.1-2.fc17
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-1892/libpng-1
On 02/17/2012 02:27 PM, FRank Murphy wrote:
On 17/02/12 20:52, John Dulaney wrote:
I say, write it in Fortran!
Cobol.
I'd vote for PL/1, APL, Ada, or BCPL. But let's get really odd...
how about Lisp? After all, we want Anaconda to self-extend to handle
all possible conditions, don't we?
The following Fedora 15 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-1534/glpi-0.78.5-3.svn17464.fc15
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-1283/drupal6-6.24-1.fc15
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-1553/rocksndiam
The following Fedora 16 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-1519/glpi-0.80.7-1.fc16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-1567/rocksndiamonds-3.3.0.1-5.fc16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-1592/nagios-3.3
On 17/02/12 20:52, John Dulaney wrote:
I say, write it in Fortran!
Cobol.
--
Regards
Frank "Jack of all Fubars"
Learning "Till the day I die"
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
On Fri, 2012-02-17 at 13:18 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-02-17 at 22:14 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > On Fri, 17 Feb 2012 13:07:44 -0800, AW (Adam) wrote:
> >
> > > > As mentioned before, "Show Plymouth boot screen" mentioned "FAILED".
> > > > It asked me to check
> > >
> > >
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 10:03:42PM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>
> No idea how long to wait for something to happen. Got impatient
> after approx. a minute. ;)
As I learned on another occasion a "standard timeout for a stuck
'compatibility' service" is five minutes. If that was that then
you
On Fri, 2012-02-17 at 22:14 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Feb 2012 13:07:44 -0800, AW (Adam) wrote:
>
> > > As mentioned before, "Show Plymouth boot screen" mentioned "FAILED".
> > > It asked me to check
> >
> > I've seen that fail in all my test installs, but it hasn't actually
> >
On Fri, 2012-02-17 at 22:14 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Feb 2012 13:07:44 -0800, AW (Adam) wrote:
>
> > > As mentioned before, "Show Plymouth boot screen" mentioned "FAILED".
> > > It asked me to check
> >
> > I've seen that fail in all my test installs, but it hasn't actually
> >
On Fri, 17 Feb 2012 13:07:44 -0800, AW (Adam) wrote:
> > As mentioned before, "Show Plymouth boot screen" mentioned "FAILED".
> > It asked me to check
>
> I've seen that fail in all my test installs, but it hasn't actually
> prevented boot.
Package "plymouth" was not installed here. Huh?
That a
On Fri, 2012-02-17 at 22:03 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Feb 2012 12:04:50 -0800, AW (Adam) wrote:
>
> > > Next I'll try to reinstall without enabling "updates".
>
> News:
>
> DVD image on hdd based installation of RC2 also locks up when booting.
> Not much on the screen except fo
On Fri, 17 Feb 2012 12:04:50 -0800, AW (Adam) wrote:
> > Next I'll try to reinstall without enabling "updates".
News:
DVD image on hdd based installation of RC2 also locks up when booting.
Not much on the screen except for loading initial RAM disk and two
lines related to checking/mounting an LV
> Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 09:29:01 -0500
> From: clum...@redhat.com
> To: test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Subject: Re: Anaconda should be rewritten in a compiled language!
>
> > Just kidding ... sort of.
> >
> > I'm willing to bet that I wouldn't be getting a "NameError: global name
> > 'BRFSErro
On Fri, 2012-02-17 at 21:44 +0100, Brendan Jones wrote:
> On 02/17/2012 09:04 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Fri, 2012-02-17 at 20:58 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> >> First boot locks up. Rebooted, locked up again. Rebooted without "rhgb
> >> quiet",
> >> locked up again: Failed to Show Plym
On 02/17/2012 09:04 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2012-02-17 at 20:58 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
First boot locks up. Rebooted, locked up again. Rebooted without "rhgb quiet",
locked up again: Failed to Show Plymouth boot screen. [FAILED]
Then a few more messages, but no LUKS passphra
On Fri, 2012-02-17 at 20:58 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> First boot locks up. Rebooted, locked up again. Rebooted without "rhgb quiet",
> locked up again: Failed to Show Plymouth boot screen. [FAILED]
> Then a few more messages, but no LUKS passphrase prompt yet.
>
> The only differences in
First boot locks up. Rebooted, locked up again. Rebooted without "rhgb quiet",
locked up again: Failed to Show Plymouth boot screen. [FAILED]
Then a few more messages, but no LUKS passphrase prompt yet.
The only differences in installing default GNOME Desktop compared with
TC2: I added a LUKS en
On Fri, 17 Feb 2012 10:11:32 -0700, AW (Adam) wrote:
> Oh, wait. I assumed the title of this thread was a typo, but maybe not.
> We are now on *RC2*, not TC2. TC2 is very outdated, please test with
> RC2.
Yeah, TC2, but I've heard that RC2 also does not install ConsoleKit,
which breaks Pulse Aud
==
#fedora-bugzappers: F17-alpha-blocker-review-4
==
Minutes:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-bugzappers/2012-02-17/f17-alpha-blocker-review-4.2012-02-17-17.00.html
Minutes (text):
http://meetbot.fedo
The following Fedora 17 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-1800/xulrunner-10.0.1-3.fc17
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-1794/thunderbird-10.0.1-2.fc17
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-1892/libpng-1
On 2012-02-17 7:39, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 14:52:35 -0800, AW (Adam) wrote:
> * GDM refused to let me log in.
>
> * Virtual console refused to let me log in. Not superuser either.
>Error message was cleared too quickly. Permission denied?
Did you do a network install
On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 14:52:35 -0800, AW (Adam) wrote:
> > * Network Manager stuck in a loop trying to bring up a secondary LAN
> >connection, which is offline currently. It fails, but retries.
> >
> > * Network Manager didn't bring up my primary DHCP based connection. Why
> > not?
> >
> >
On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 14:52:35 -0800, AW (Adam) wrote:
> > * GDM refused to let me log in.
> >
> > * Virtual console refused to let me log in. Not superuser either.
> >Error message was cleared too quickly. Permission denied?
>
> Did you do a network install? If so you likely got an older sy
> Just kidding ... sort of.
>
> I'm willing to bet that I wouldn't be getting a "NameError: global name
> 'BRFSError' is not defined" traceback if it were. (BTRFSError anyone?)
>
> Bugzilla at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=794504.
You know, redoing it in Haskell really would solve
Compose started at Fri Feb 17 08:15:11 UTC 2012
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[HippoDraw]
HippoDraw-devel-1.21.3-2.fc17.i686 requires python-numarray
HippoDraw-devel-1.21.3-2.fc17.x86_64 requires python-numarray
HippoDraw-
26 matches
Mail list logo