On Sat, 2012-02-04 at 17:16 +, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On 04/02/12 17:07, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> > I don't think any code has yet been added to anaconda to do the /usr
> > move preparation stuff on upgrade; so it seems quite likely that
> > the /usr move is the source of the problem here.
>
The following Fedora 15 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-1077/wicd-1.7.0-11.fc15
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-0888/curl-7.21.3-13.fc15
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-0917/znc-0.204-3.fc15
The following Fedora 16 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-1059/wicd-1.7.0-10.fc16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-1192/usbmuxd-1.0.7-3.fc16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-0730/jetty-6.1.26-8.fc16
On 04/02/12 18:27, Tom London wrote:
I recovered by downloading nss-softokn-3.13.1-20.fc17 packages from
koji, expanding them (on a Mac :-( ), and then copying the appropriate
files to /usr/lib64.
Will test in the morning.
Now that rpm was working again, I could 'rpm -Uvh --force' the -20
On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 7:03 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
>
>
> yum update gives the following:
>
> cannot open shared object or file libfreebl3.so
> too many symbolic links to follow.
>
> Can someone post TC1 see if they can confirm this?
> Or it's a reinstall.
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Frank Murphy, frien
On 04/02/12 17:07, Adam Williamson wrote:
I don't think any code has yet been added to anaconda to do the /usr
move preparation stuff on upgrade; so it seems quite likely that
the /usr move is the source of the problem here.
The switch back to Rawhide?
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy, friend of fed
On 04/02/12 17:08, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sat, 2012-02-04 at 13:03 +, Frank Murphy wrote:
Looking at the test matrix.
Couldn't see a test about upgrading From F16.
There's eight 'upgrade' tests, all at the very bottom of the whole
matrix.
duh! Just looked at the boot.iso bit.
--
Rega
Several tests in the install test matrix require the above option, but when
anaconda attempts to start after downloading the file, I get the text-based
traceback (not the expected GUI error) at
http://robatino.fedorapeople.org/traceback.xwd.gz
(use "display traceback.xwd.gz" to view, where displa
On Sat, 2012-02-04 at 13:03 +, Frank Murphy wrote:
> Looking at the test matrix.
> Couldn't see a test about upgrading From F16.
There's eight 'upgrade' tests, all at the very bottom of the whole
matrix.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi
On Sat, 2012-02-04 at 15:45 +, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On 04/02/12 15:37, Mike Chambers wrote:
> > On Sat, 2012-02-04 at 13:03 +, Frank Murphy wrote:
> >> Looking at the test matrix.
> >> Couldn't see a test about upgrading From F16.
> >> Which it did sucessfully.
> >>
> >> and it reboot to F
On 04/02/12 15:37, Mike Chambers wrote:
On Sat, 2012-02-04 at 13:03 +, Frank Murphy wrote:
Looking at the test matrix.
Couldn't see a test about upgrading From F16.
Which it did sucessfully.
and it reboot to F17 kernel.
The /usr move stuff didn't cause any problems when you did the upgrad
On Sat, 2012-02-04 at 13:03 +, Frank Murphy wrote:
> Looking at the test matrix.
> Couldn't see a test about upgrading From F16.
> Which it did sucessfully.
>
> and it reboot to F17 kernel.
The /usr move stuff didn't cause any problems when you did the upgrade?
Was that through the installer
yum update gives the following:
cannot open shared object or file libfreebl3.so
too many symbolic links to follow.
Can someone post TC1 see if they can confirm this?
Or it's a reinstall.
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy, friend of fedoraproject
UTF_8 Encoded
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedorapro
Looking at the test matrix.
Couldn't see a test about upgrading From F16.
Which it did sucessfully.
and it reboot to F17 kernel.
But with "rhgb quiet" removed.
Some of the "ok" looked like Cyrillic?
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy, friend of fedoraproject
UTF_8 Encoded
--
test mailing list
test@lists
On 04/02/12 10:38, Frank Murphy wrote:
Same error with the netinstall.iso TC1
Found a bz:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784439
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy, friend of fedoraproject
UTF_8 Encoded
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedo
As there are no current LiveCD for testing.
Using the last working Xfce.
Fedora-17-Nightly-20120130.09-x86_64-Live-xfce
Anyhow, cant send a bz due to xml-rpc
No Fedora release "17"
Same error with the netinstall.iso TC1
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy, friend of fedoraproject
UTF_8 Encoded
--
test m
16 matches
Mail list logo