you forgot to convert with dracut before yum upgrade... right??
Am 30.01.2012 22:11 schrieb "Orion Poplawski" :
> On 01/30/2012 12:17 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
>
>> On 01/27/2012 06:10 AM, Harald Hoyer wrote:
>>
>>> Until the rawhide repository gets all the converted rpms, use the
>>> f17-usrmove
As always, minutes and IRC transcript available on the wiki at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Meetings/20120130
Next meeting is scheduled for 2012-02-06 at 1600 UTC in #fedora-meeting.
If you have topics you think we should bring up at the meeting, please
add them to the Wiki page at
https
On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 21:56 -0500, Jon Stanley wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 8:49 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> > Yeah, this is kind of problematic, because I don't really want the
> > release criteria to prescribe exactly what the 'minimal' package set
> > should include. Perhaps we should j
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 8:49 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Yeah, this is kind of problematic, because I don't really want the
> release criteria to prescribe exactly what the 'minimal' package set
> should include. Perhaps we should just explicitly refer to 'the
> installer's "minimal" package set
On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 19:57 -0500, Jon Stanley wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 7:38 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> > We could phrase it a little bit more similarly to the existing default
> > install criterion:
> >
> > "The installer must be able to complete package installation with the
> > def
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 7:38 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> We could phrase it a little bit more similarly to the existing default
> install criterion:
>
> "The installer must be able to complete package installation with the
> default package set for each supported installation method"
>
> Perhaps
On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 11:29 -0500, Petr Schindler wrote:
> I propose final criterion:
>
> "The installer must be able to handle the failure and report the
> issue. The installer must be also able to access debug mode."
>
> We have test case for this - [1]. It's useful to have this feature.
>
>
On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 20:40 +, Andre Robatino wrote:
> Petr Schindler redhat.com> writes:
>
> >
> > Test case [1] is marked as alpha release level in [2]. I propose to change
> > it
> to beta. We have beta criterion
> > "The network installation image, DVD image, and live images for
> relea
On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 18:02 +, Andre Robatino wrote:
> Petr Schindler redhat.com> writes:
>
> > I propose new final criterion:
> >
> > "There must be published correct checksum for each ISO media. Also if there
> > is
> embedded checksum on ISO
> > media, it must be correct."
> >
> > I
On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 11:37 -0500, Petr Schindler wrote:
> I propose new test cases [1]. This test case is related to final criterion:
>
> "All services in a default install must start properly"
>
> We don't have test case for this right now.
>
> [1]
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Pschin
On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 11:36 -0500, Petr Schindler wrote:
> I propose new test case [1]. This test case is related to final criterion:
>
> "The installed system must run normally if the user chooses to install
> without SELinux"
>
> There is no test case for this now.
>
> I have one note on this
On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 11:35 -0500, Petr Schindler wrote:
> I propose to enhance alpha criterion
>
> "The installer must be able to report failures to Bugzilla, with appropriate
> information included"
> to
> "The installer must be able to report failures to Bugzilla, remote system and
> local
On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 11:33 -0500, Petr Schindler wrote:
> I propose to remove [1] test case as we don't need it anymore. EFI
> booting is handled by regular image.
>
> [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Boot_Methods_efidisk.img
Ack. For F17, I believe, the plan is not to ship an efid
On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 11:28 -0500, Petr Schindler wrote:
> I propose new beta criterion:
>
> "The installer must be able to use updates.img obtained by any supported way"
>
> I think, that this should be at criteria too. There are test cases which uses
> this feature - [1], [2]
>
> [1]
> http
On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 11:26 -0500, Petr Schindler wrote:
> I propose new alpha criterion:
>
> "The installer must be able to download and apply updates.img file
> using a HTTP url and use it"
Small proofread suggestion:
"The installer must be able to download and use an [[Anaconda/Updates|
inst
On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 11:25 -0500, Petr Schindler wrote:
> I propose new beta criterion:
>
> "The installer must be able to install system with minimal usable set of
> packages."
>
> There is test case [1] associated with alpha, I'd change it to beta release
> level.
>
> [1]
> https://fedora
On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 11:23 -0500, Petr Schindler wrote:
> I propose new final criterion:
>
> "The installer must be able to run memory test."
>
> This feature is very useful and should work. We have test case for
> this yet [1]. I'd move it to final release level.
>
> [1] https://fedoraprojec
On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 11:23 -0500, Petr Schindler wrote:
> I propose new final criterion:
>
> "There must be published correct checksum for each ISO media. Also if
> there is embedded checksum on ISO media, it must be correct."
Small grammar fixes:
"A correct checksum published for each officia
On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 11:21 -0500, Petr Schindler wrote:
> Test case [1] is associated with alpha release level in [2]. I propose to
> change it to beta level, where is criterion: "The installer must be able to
> use all kickstart delivery methods."
>
> [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Test
On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 11:20 -0500, Petr Schindler wrote:
> Test case [1] is marked as alpha release level in [2]. I propose to change it
> to beta. We have beta criterion "The network installation image, DVD image,
> and live images for release-blocking desktops must meet current size
> requirem
On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 08:17 -0500, Josef Skladanka wrote:
> This testcase [1] should ensure, that if the user uses USB stick and
> transfers the DVD.iso to it using Livecd-iso-to-disk, the installation can be
> successfully finished.
> Installer should be able to use the DVD local package source
On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 07:58 -0500, Josef Skladanka wrote:
> This testcase [1] should ensure, that if the user uses dd to transfer the
> Fedora Live.iso to USB stick, the boot process works 'as expected'.
>
> I propose this as a Alpha verification testcase.
>
> ---
>
> =
On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 11:18 +, Frank Murphy wrote:
> Any idea on when /usrmove nightlies.
> Might be ready for testing.
Nightlies won't include the /usr move stuff until it's tagged into
Rawhide, but tflink is trying to build a special boot.iso with the /usr
move packages included. So far he's
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 4:07 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Josh Boyer (jwbo...@gmail.com) said:
>> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 3:52 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
>> > Rob Healey (robheal...@gmail.com) said:
>> >> Can anyone tell me if rpmfusion's rawhide packages have been updated yet
>> >> for rpm guard
On 01/30/2012 12:17 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 01/27/2012 06:10 AM, Harald Hoyer wrote:
Until the rawhide repository gets all the converted rpms, use the f17-usrmove
repository to update the system after the filesystem conversion and disable
rawhide in the file /etc/yum.repos.d/fedora-rawhide
Josh Boyer (jwbo...@gmail.com) said:
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 3:52 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > Rob Healey (robheal...@gmail.com) said:
> >> Can anyone tell me if rpmfusion's rawhide packages have been updated yet
> >> for rpm guard?
> >
> > Given that, at best, rpmfusion builds against rawhid
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 3:52 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Rob Healey (robheal...@gmail.com) said:
>> Can anyone tell me if rpmfusion's rawhide packages have been updated yet
>> for rpm guard?
>
> Given that, at best, rpmfusion builds against rawhide/branched Fedora,
> and that the converted packag
The following Fedora 15 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-0888/curl-7.21.3-13.fc15
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-0939/moodle-1.9.16-1.fc15
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-0917/znc-0.204-3.fc15
The following Fedora 16 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-0913/moodle-2.0.7-1.fc16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-0921/znc-0.204-3.fc16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-0941/bip-0.8.8-2.fc16
ht
Martin Langhoff (martin.langh...@gmail.com) said:
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 3:47 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > Assuming /bin -> /usr/bin link is packaged, yes.
>
> Wow, it follows the symlink created by a 3rd package.
Technically, the link doesn't even need to be packaged; as long as /bin
exis
Rob Healey (robheal...@gmail.com) said:
> Can anyone tell me if rpmfusion's rawhide packages have been updated yet
> for rpm guard?
Given that, at best, rpmfusion builds against rawhide/branched Fedora,
and that the converted packages only live in the side repository at the
moment... no.
It's no
Jef Spaleta (jspal...@gmail.com) said:
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 10:17 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> > I suppose I could add in the i386 repo...
>
> Is this just a side effect of the special repository structure? For
> rawhide itself, once tagged in, would the 32bit packages be available
> on th
Martin Langhoff (martin.langh...@gmail.com) said:
> On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 8:10 AM, Harald Hoyer wrote:
> > Fedora 17 will locate the entire base operating system in /usr. The
> > directories
> > /bin, /sbin, /lib, /lib64 will only be symlinks:
> > /bin → /usr/bin
>
> Interesting!
>
> Do we
Petr Schindler redhat.com> writes:
>
> Test case [1] is marked as alpha release level in [2]. I propose to change it
to beta. We have beta criterion
> "The network installation image, DVD image, and live images for
release-blocking desktops must meet
> current size requirements" for this.
>
> [
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 10:17 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> I suppose I could add in the i386 repo...
Is this just a side effect of the special repository structure? For
rawhide itself, once tagged in, would the 32bit packages be available
on the 64bit system without additional intervention? Or i
On 01/27/2012 06:10 AM, Harald Hoyer wrote:
Until the rawhide repository gets all the converted rpms, use the f17-usrmove
repository to update the system after the filesystem conversion and disable
rawhide in the file /etc/yum.repos.d/fedora-rawhide.repo
Add f17-usrmove in the file /etc/yum.repo
Petr Schindler redhat.com> writes:
> I propose new final criterion:
>
> "There must be published correct checksum for each ISO media. Also if there is
embedded checksum on ISO
> media, it must be correct."
>
> I think we should check this. We have already test case [1]. I propose to
change r
I propose new test cases [1]. This test case is related to final criterion:
"All services in a default install must start properly"
We don't have test case for this right now.
[1]
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Pschindl/Draft_QA_Testcase_Services_start
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedo
I propose new test case [1]. This test case is related to final criterion:
"The installed system must run normally if the user chooses to install without
SELinux"
There is no test case for this now.
I have one note on this. There is used noselinux option, but it doesn't work
now. I filled bug
I propose to enhance alpha criterion
"The installer must be able to report failures to Bugzilla, with appropriate
information included"
to
"The installer must be able to report failures to Bugzilla, remote system and
local disk, with appopriate information included"
Especially saving failures
I propose to remove [1] test case as we don't need it anymore. EFI booting is
handled by regular image.
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Boot_Methods_efidisk.img
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
I propose final criterion:
"The installer must be able to handle the failure and report the issue. The
installer must be also able to access debug mode."
We have test case for this - [1]. It's useful to have this feature.
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Anaconda_traceback_debug_
I propose new beta criterion:
"The installer must be able to use updates.img obtained by any supported way"
I think, that this should be at criteria too. There are test cases which uses
this feature - [1], [2]
[1]
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Anaconda_updates.img_via_installatio
I propose new alpha criterion:
"The installer must be able to download and apply updates.img file using a HTTP
url and use it"
We have test cases for this [1], but no criterion. I think it's pretty
importing -> alpha.
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Anaconda_updates.img_via_URL
I propose new beta criterion:
"The installer must be able to install system with minimal usable set of
packages."
There is test case [1] associated with alpha, I'd change it to beta release
level.
[1]
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Package_Sets_Minimal_Package_Install
--
test ma
I propose new final criterion:
"The installer must be able to run memory test."
This feature is very useful and should work. We have test case for this yet
[1]. I'd move it to final release level.
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Memtest86
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedora
I propose new final criterion:
"The installer must be able to run memory test."
This feature is very useful and should work. We have test case for this yet
[1]. I'd move it to final release level.
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Memtest86
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedora
I propose new final criterion:
"There must be published correct checksum for each ISO media. Also if there is
embedded checksum on ISO media, it must be correct."
I think we should check this. We have already test case [1]. I propose to
change release level for this test case to final.
[1]
Test case [1] is associated with alpha release level in [2]. I propose to
change it to beta level, where is criterion: "The installer must be able to use
all kickstart delivery methods."
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Kickstart_Http_Server_Ks_Cfg
[2] https://fedoraproject.org/wik
Test case [1] is marked as alpha release level in [2]. I propose to change it
to beta. We have beta criterion "The network installation image, DVD image, and
live images for release-blocking desktops must meet current size requirements"
for this.
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_M
Hi,
as an output of my work on [1] I'd like to propose some new testcases, criteria
and some modifications of present ones. It would be great if you look at them
and whether you will have some suggestions, please let me know (on mailing
list).
Regards
Petr Schindler
[1] https://fedorahosted.o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/29/2012 05:33 PM, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> On 01/27/2012 04:08 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>> On 01/27/2012 08:10 AM, Harald Hoyer wrote:
>>> The packages, which are about to land in rawhide, are at this
>>> moment available via the ‘f17-us
This testcase [1] should ensure, that if the user uses USB stick and transfers
the DVD.iso to it using Livecd-iso-to-disk, the installation can be
successfully finished.
Installer should be able to use the DVD local package source options, but this
is caused by the way LITD writes the image to t
This testcase [1] should ensure, that if the user uses USB stick and transfers
the DVD.iso to it using dd, the installation can be successfully finished.
Even though this technically is DVD.iso, we do not require anaconda to
successfully use the DVD local package source options (F17 Alpha Release
This testcase [1] should ensure, that if the user uses LiveCD tools to transfer
the Fedora Live.iso to USB stick, the boot process works 'as expected'.
I propose this as a Alpha verification testcase.
---
= Description =
This test verifies that Fedora Live Image can be
This testcase [1] should ensure, that if the user uses Livecd-iso-to-disk to
transfer the Fedora Live.iso to USB stick, the boot process works 'as expected'.
I propose this as a Alpha verification testcase.
---
= Description =
This test verifies that Fedora Live Image c
This testcase [1] should ensure, that if the user uses dd to transfer the
Fedora Live.iso to USB stick, the boot process works 'as expected'.
I propose this as a Alpha verification testcase.
---
= Description =
This test verifies that Fedora Live Image can be booted fro
Hello,
as per [1] and [2], I'd like to propose five new testcases, which focus on
testing the ability to boot/install Fedora using USB stick as the
installation/boot medium. Even though, there is no Release Criterion specifying
the supported installation media, the [2] mentions 'Common Boot med
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 10:10 PM, Harald Hoyer wrote:
> Hello Testers and rawhide Users,
>
> Fedora 17 will locate the entire base operating system in /usr.
> [...]
You guys really are going to do this?
If it were I, instead of combining, I'd be working through the list of
what is where and star
Compose started at Mon Jan 30 08:15:10 UTC 2012
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[aunit]
aunit-2010-3.fc16.i686 requires libgnat-4.6.so
aunit-2010-3.fc16.x86_64 requires libgnat-4.6.so()(64bit)
[autotrust]
autotrust-0.3.1-7.f
Any idea on when /usrmove nightlies.
Might be ready for testing.
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy, friend of fedoraproject
UTF_8 Encoded
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
61 matches
Mail list logo
