Fedora 15 updates-testing report

2012-01-28 Thread updates
The following Fedora 15 Security updates need testing: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-0888/curl-7.21.3-13.fc15 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-0939/moodle-1.9.16-1.fc15 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-0917/znc-0.204-3.fc15

Fedora 16 updates-testing report

2012-01-28 Thread updates
The following Fedora 16 Security updates need testing: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-0913/moodle-2.0.7-1.fc16 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-0921/znc-0.204-3.fc16 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-0941/bip-0.8.8-2.fc16 h

F17's unified usrmove

2012-01-28 Thread Rob Healey
Greetings: On 28/01/12 02:22, Adam Williamson wrote: > suggest we want at least: > > * two or three successful tests of the yum process with an existing > Rawhide install > I had no problems or dependency errors wih a fully updates rawhide system. x86_64 works beautifully I have updated an Rawh

Re: Fedora 17’s unified filesystem (/usr-move)

2012-01-28 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sat, 2012-01-28 at 16:31 +, Frank Murphy wrote: > On 28/01/12 02:22, Adam Williamson wrote: > > suggest we want at least: > > > > * two or three successful tests of the yum process with an existing > > Rawhide install > > I have updated an Rawhide to /usr no problems. > > > > * a successf

Re: Fedora 17’s unified filesystem (/usr-move)

2012-01-28 Thread Tom H
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 11:31 AM, Frank Murphy wrote: > On 28/01/12 02:22, Adam Williamson wrote: >> >> suggest we want at least: >> >> * two or three successful tests of the yum process with an existing >> Rawhide install > > I have updated an Rawhide to /usr no problems. +1 -- test mailing lis

Re: Fedora 17’s unified filesystem (/usr-move)

2012-01-28 Thread Frank Murphy
On 28/01/12 02:22, Adam Williamson wrote: suggest we want at least: * two or three successful tests of the yum process with an existing Rawhide install I have updated an Rawhide to /usr no problems. * a successful test of a fresh install with the /usr move packages (assuming we're in a stat

Re: F17's usrmove and rpmfusion?

2012-01-28 Thread Frank Murphy
On 28/01/12 11:45, Rob Healey wrote: Greetings: Can anyone tell me if rpmfusion's rawhide packages have been updated yet for rpm guard? Would not an rpmfusion list subscription. Be ideal for anyone using rpmfusion in a system. -- Regards, Frank Murphy, friend of fedoraproject UTF_8 Encoded

F17's usrmove and rpmfusion?

2012-01-28 Thread Rob Healey
Greetings: Can anyone tell me if rpmfusion's rawhide packages have been updated yet for rpm guard? -- Sincerely yours, Rob G. Healey -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

F17 Features list?

2012-01-28 Thread Frank Murphy
I prefer yum "upgrade\date" Currently, there seems to be nothing in features, that would warrent a clean install. Will any feature sneak in post branch? -- Regards, Frank Murphy, friend of fedoraproject UTF_8 Encoded -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admi

Re: F17's usrmove

2012-01-28 Thread Frank Murphy
On 28/01/12 10:21, Rob Healey wrote: Greetings: I did exactly as directed in this email, but I have one question... I was already updated to current rawhide, and it told me that I only had to update 73 files... Does this seem correct??? Probably, yes. As the email stated not all packages hav

F17's usrmove

2012-01-28 Thread Rob Healey
Greetings: I did exactly as directed in this email, but I have one question... I was already updated to current rawhide, and it told me that I only had to update 73 files... Does this seem correct??? -- Sincerely yours, Rob G. Healey -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubs