On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 16:37:48 -0600, BWI (Bruno) wrote:
> The error message in the configure test for SDL is:
> /usr/lib/gcc/i686-redhat-linux/4.7.0/../../../libSDL.so: undefined reference
> to `_XGetRequest'
>
That's a libX11 symbol. SDL accesses several X headers, but doesn't link
with any X l
If you don't currently have any 32-bit packages installed, you can just exclude
them like
yum --skip-broken --exclude=\*.i686 distro-sync
which is the command I normally use.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 17:53:56 -0800,
Rob Healey wrote:
> Greetings All:
>
> I know that in the past when I had a problem with yum, I was ask to paste
> in the entire yum output...
>
> I would if I could. I do not know if it is possible to capture the entire
> yum output with a fully-update
Greetings All:
I know that in the past when I had a problem with yum, I was ask to paste
in the entire yum output...
I would if I could. I do not know if it is possible to capture the entire
yum output with a fully-updated and installed FC16 x86_64 system as there
is over 700 packages...
Is the
#275: Create test plan for ARM
---+-
Reporter: jdulaney | Owner:
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone:
Component: Trac |Version:
Resolution:| Keywords:
Blocked By:| Blocking:
#275: Create test plan for ARM
--+--
Reporter: jdulaney | Owner:
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone:
Component: Trac | Version:
Keywords:| Blocked By:
Blocking:|
#271: L10N and i18n Test Day
---+---
Reporter: aalam | Owner:
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 17
Component: Test Day |Version:
Resolution:| Keywords:
Blocked By:
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 16:37:48 -0600,
Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>
> I was seeing this after the 4.7 mass rebuild was retagged into rawhide. So
> it may be there was a problem with the SDL rebuild. That would explain why
> I not not seeing it at home. That should be easy to test and then I may ha
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 15:03:26 -0600,
Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> I am having trouble rebuilding a couple of packages that use SDL in
> koji, but they build OK at home.
>
> Did something change recently with SDL that would have needed something
> added to buildrequires?
The error message in the
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 22:19:57 +0100,
Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 15:03:26 -0600, BWI (Bruno) wrote:
>
> > I am having trouble rebuilding a couple of packages that use SDL in
> > koji, but they build OK at home.
> >
> > Did something change recently with SDL that would have
The following Fedora 15 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2011-15560/nss-3.12.10-7.fc15
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2011-16284/krb5-1.9.2-4.fc15
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-0372/torque-3.0.3-1.fc15
The following Fedora 16 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-0435/wireshark-1.6.5-1.fc16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-0490/dhcp-4.2.3-5.P2.fc16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-0523/qt-4.8.0-7.fc1
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 15:03:26 -0600, BWI (Bruno) wrote:
> I am having trouble rebuilding a couple of packages that use SDL in
> koji, but they build OK at home.
>
> Did something change recently with SDL that would have needed something
> added to buildrequires?
Even if an SDL* maintainer happens
I am having trouble rebuilding a couple of packages that use SDL in
koji, but they build OK at home.
Did something change recently with SDL that would have needed something
added to buildrequires?
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/ma
#273: Improve browseability of validation matrix pages
--+---
Reporter: adamwill | Owner: adamwill
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: major| Miles
Michal Jaegermann harddata.com> writes:
> No idea. It still works for me after many reboots. Are you sure
> that you do not have any typos in /lib/systemd/system/syslog.socket?
> If not then what 'systemctl status syslog.socket' has to say?
> As https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=78165
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 05:54:21AM +, Andre Robatino wrote:
> Michal Jaegermann harddata.com> writes:
>
> > That would be most likely
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=781657
> > See comment #2 (and #3) in particular. It resolved that issue for me.
>
> The procedure described
#270: Proposed Test Day - Sugar Desktop
+---
Reporter: greenfeld | Owner: jdulaney
Type: task | Status: assigned
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 17
Component: Test Day |Version:
Resolution: |
18 matches
Mail list logo