On Fri, 2011-12-02 at 17:24 -0500, Tom Callaway wrote:
> IMHO, this seems like the sort of thing that would benefit from a
> discussion session at the upcoming FUDCon where there will be members of
> the Fedora Design team and the main coders of Bodhi. Not that I want to
> do it in secret, but com
On 11/22/2011 04:03 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Hey, folks.
>
> So in the recent proven tester discussion, and in various other threads,
> I've oft stated that the limits of the current Bodhi karma system are a
> significant problem, and the planned Bodhi 2.0 karma system has to
> potentially to
The following Fedora 15 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2011-15560/nss-3.12.10-7.fc15
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2011-16476/psi-0.14-7.fc15
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2011-14753/hardlink-1.0-12.fc15
The following Fedora 16 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2011-15196/openswan-2.6.37-1.fc16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2011-16075/nginx-1.0.10-1.fc16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2011-14920/kdeutils-4.
The following Fedora 14 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2011-14737/hardlink-1.0-12.fc14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2011-14202/xmlrpc3-3.0-6.fc14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2011-15127/openswan-2.6.33
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 7:36 AM, Rawhide Report
wrote:
>
> Broken deps for i386
> --
> kernel-PAE-modules-extra-3.2.0-0.rc4.git0.2.fc17.i686 requires
> kernel-PAE-i686 = 0:3.2.0-0.rc4.git0.2.fc17.PAE
This should be fixed with the next
Hey,
I'd appreciate some more testing for the colord update
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2011-16453 -- it fixes
a security bug (although very low severity one at that) and I would
like to push it to F16 as soon as possible. It's been sitting in
updates-testing for nearly a week n
