Re: Release criterion proposal: betanag removal

2011-11-30 Thread Dennis Gilmore
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 El Wed, 30 Nov 2011 09:01:03 -0800 Adam Williamson escribió: > On Wed, 2011-11-30 at 10:03 -0600, Mike Chambers wrote: > > On Tue, 2011-11-29 at 18:21 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > A straightforward release criterion proposal: we should have a >

[Test-Announce] Very belated 2011-09 Graphics Test Week recap

2011-11-30 Thread Adam Williamson
I know this is horribly late, but I just worked my way around to it! Sorry for that. Here's the recap of the Fedora 16 Graphics Test Week. The overall numbers of tests done and bugs filed are down significantly, because I was very busy and did not do a great job of arranging and promoting the even

Re: Is there a need for more Xen test cases for Fedora?

2011-11-30 Thread Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 04:54:05PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Tue, 2011-11-29 at 17:47 -0700, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > On 29 November 2011 17:40, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > Hey, folks. I'm working through the f16 QA retrospective, and one of the > > > suggestions is: > > > > > > "

[Test-Announce] AutoQA Upgrade to 0.7

2011-11-30 Thread Tim Flink
As a heads up, we're updating AutoQA to 0.7 today. I'm not expecting any issues during the update process but no new jobs will be run while we're updating the production systems. The update process shouldn't take much more than an hour, maybe two if we hit problems. If all goes well, you might not

Re: Todays yum dependency update issues....

2011-11-30 Thread Adam Jackson
On Wed, 2011-11-30 at 10:37 -0600, Kevin Martin wrote: > What's with the xserver-abi dependency problem (ie: > xorg-x11-drv-vesa-2.3.0-11.fc17.x86_64 requires: xserver-abi(ansic-2009) > >= 0 > --> Processing Dependency: xserver-abi(ansic-2009) >= 0 for package: > xorg-x11-drv-vesa-2.3.

Re: Release criterion proposal: betanag removal

2011-11-30 Thread Adam Williamson
On Wed, 2011-11-30 at 10:03 -0600, Mike Chambers wrote: > On Tue, 2011-11-29 at 18:21 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > > A straightforward release criterion proposal: we should have a criterion > > just to specify that the anaconda betanag screen (and any others we put > > in) should be removed for

Todays yum dependency update issues....

2011-11-30 Thread Kevin Martin
Skipped (dependency problems): boost-serializationx86_64 1.48.0-2.fc17 rawhide 158 k gvfs x86_64 1.11.0-4.fc17 fedo

Re: Release criterion proposal: betanag removal

2011-11-30 Thread Mike Chambers
On Tue, 2011-11-29 at 18:21 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > A straightforward release criterion proposal: we should have a criterion > just to specify that the anaconda betanag screen (and any others we put > in) should be removed for final. Right now this is one of those things > that's "just obvi

Re: proposal for naming blocker and NTH bugs

2011-11-30 Thread Kamil Paral
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 02:51, Andre Robatino > wrote: > > 17Alpha > > 17AlphaNTH > > 17Beta > > 17BetaNTH > > 17Final (or alternatively 17) > > 17FinalNTH (or alternatively 17NTH) > > Why not: > 17AlphaBlocker > 17AlphaNTH > 17BetaBlocker > 17BetaNTH > 17FinalBlocker > 17FinalNTH > ... verbosi

Re: Release criterion proposal: betanag removal

2011-11-30 Thread Kamil Paral
> A straightforward release criterion proposal: we should have a > criterion > just to specify that the anaconda betanag screen (and any others we > put > in) should be removed for final. Right now this is one of those > things > that's "just obvious" but that we ought to write down somewhere. How