As always, minutes and IRC transcript available on the wiki at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Meetings/2021
Next meeting is 2011-11-28 at 1600 UTC in #fedora-meeting. Please add
any proposed agenda items to the Wiki page at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Meetings/2028 . Thanks
The following Fedora 14 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2011-14737/hardlink-1.0-12.fc14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2011-14202/xmlrpc3-3.0-6.fc14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2011-15127/openswan-2.6.33
The following Fedora 15 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2011-15933/ReviewBoard-1.5.7-1.fc15
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2011-15560/nss-3.12.10-7.fc15
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2011-14753/hardlink-1.
The following Fedora 16 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2011-14727/hardlink-1.0-12.fc16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2011-15196/openswan-2.6.37-1.fc16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2011-16075/nginx-1.0.
On Mon, 2011-11-21 at 18:22 +0100, Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 4:26 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> [snip]
> >
> > So my next intuition would be to gdb the X server and see what's up. If
> > you find it waiting patiently on a call to select(), then the second
> > case is more likely
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 4:26 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
[snip]
>
> So my next intuition would be to gdb the X server and see what's up. If
> you find it waiting patiently on a call to select(), then the second
> case is more likely, and 'print AllClients' should show you an fd_set
> with only one bit
Greetings everyone,
A few updates on the upcoming FUDCon in Blacksburg, VA in January 2012:
* We will be having our second subsidy meeting on Wednesday, November
23rd. This meeting will be for evaluating and processing any available
subsidy monies for international attendees, as well as proces
On Mon, 2011-11-21 at 12:11 +0100, Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 7:00 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
>
> > If you debuginfo-install gnome-shell, attach with gdb instead of sending
> > SIGHUP, and run 'thread apply all backtrace', what do you get?
>
> As MJ whould have said... This is
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 7:00 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> If you debuginfo-install gnome-shell, attach with gdb instead of sending
> SIGHUP, and run 'thread apply all backtrace', what do you get?
>
> - ajax
>
As MJ whould have said... This is it ... ;-)
Gianluca
gnome-shell_debug.log.gz
Descript
