Re: I/O Bound Procs Clobbering Responsiveness

2011-11-07 Thread Jared K. Smith
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 10:06 PM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote: > This a subjective comment, but it seems that I/O bound procs > such as disk copy are seriously impacting GUI response more > than before. I noticed the same thing yesterday while trying to create a live usb key using livecd-is

Re: Fedora 17 and Gnome Shell...

2011-11-07 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 14:23:59 -0800, Rob Healey wrote: > Greetings: > > I know that Fc16 will be GA (General Audience) release day, but I was > wondering if there has been any schedule set for FC17 yet? There is a tentative schedule at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rbergero/F17DraftS

Re: gtk3-3.3.2-1/ fc16

2011-11-07 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Mon, 7 Nov 2011 14:19:17 -0800 Rob Healey wrote: > Hello! > > A few daysd ago, I tried something that seemed uncomplicated to me? > How sad that was? > > I enabled rawhide and disabled fedora updates updates-testing... > > I updated only gtk2 gtk2-devel gtk3 gtk3-devel on my fc16 machine.

Fedora 17 and Gnome Shell...

2011-11-07 Thread Rob Healey
Greetings: I know that Fc16 will be GA (General Audience) release day, but I was wondering if there has been any schedule set for FC17 yet? I know that FC17 is pre-Alpha, but can anyone tell me why I can go into Gnome Shell in fc16, but not FC17? -- Sincerely yours, Rob G. Healey -- test maili

gtk3-3.3.2-1/ fc16

2011-11-07 Thread Rob Healey
Hello! A few daysd ago, I tried something that seemed uncomplicated to me? How sad that was? I enabled rawhide and disabled fedora updates updates-testing... I updated only gtk2 gtk2-devel gtk3 gtk3-devel on my fc16 machine. I rebooted, and now the computer will not finish loading Gnome Shell

Re: How can I reply to a thread in the digest?

2011-11-07 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Mon, 2011-11-07 at 12:51 -0600, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote: > > I've switched off digest mode. Makes it easier to get past > > looong posts about dependencies et al. > > Now just switch off HTML and top-posting and you'll be set. +1 poc -- test mailing

Re: How can I reply to a thread in the digest?

2011-11-07 Thread Michael Cronenworth
Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote: > I've switched off digest mode. Makes it easier to get past > looong posts about dependencies et al. Now just switch off HTML and top-posting and you'll be set. -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org

Re: Nautilus 3.2.1 Does Not Work

2011-11-07 Thread Joachim Backes
On 11/07/2011 07:03 PM, James J Catchpole wrote: > I have been using Fedora 16 for some time now and Nautilus has never > worked. I assumed that it would be fixed but so far nothing has been > done. I have been watching for other posts regarding it but have seen > none so perhaps it is limited to m

Re: How can I reply to a thread in the digest?

2011-11-07 Thread Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R
I've switched off digest mode. Makes it easier to get past looong posts about dependencies et al. On 11/07/2011 10:17 AM, Jonathan Kamens wrote: On 11/5/2011 2:16 PM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote: I am running Thunderbird 7.01 on 64 bit Fedora 16 RC5. I tried installing the "undigestfy"

Re: Nautilus 3.2.1 Does Not Work

2011-11-07 Thread Matthias Clasen
On Mon, 2011-11-07 at 13:03 -0500, James J Catchpole wrote: > I have been using Fedora 16 for some time now and Nautilus has never > worked. I assumed that it would be fixed but so far nothing has been > done. I have been watching for other posts regarding it but have seen > none so perhaps it is l

Re: Nautilus 3.2.1 Does Not Work

2011-11-07 Thread Jonathan Kamens
1. It was entirely unnecessary for you to quote an entire list digest in a message that had nothing to do with anything in the digest. 2. You're going to need to be a lot more specific than "has never worked" if you expect anyone to be able to help you. As you pointed out, no one else has repo

Re: How can I reply to a thread in the digest?

2011-11-07 Thread Jonathan Kamens
On 11/5/2011 2:16 PM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote: I am running Thunderbird 7.01 on 64 bit Fedora 16 RC5. I tried installing the "undigestfy" plug-in but it complains the Fedora test list digest is in an improper format. It is, in fact, in an improper format. Mailman is violating RFC 1153

Nautilus 3.2.1 Does Not Work

2011-11-07 Thread James J Catchpole
I have been using Fedora 16 for some time now and Nautilus has never worked. I assumed that it would be fixed but so far nothing has been done. I have been watching for other posts regarding it but have seen none so perhaps it is limited to my system. I am currently at na

I/O Bound Procs Clobbering Responsiveness

2011-11-07 Thread Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R
This a subjective comment, but it seems that I/O bound procs such as disk copy are seriously impacting GUI response more than before. For example, switching windows can take 30 seconds or more. Indeed it appears the system has halted except that the clock seconds keep ticking away. Setup: R655

rawhide report: 20111107 changes

2011-11-07 Thread Rawhide Report
Compose started at Mon Nov 7 08:16:07 UTC 2011 Broken deps for x86_64 -- 4ti2-1.3.2-7.fc17.1.x86_64 requires libgmp.so.3()(64bit) 1:anerley-0.3.0-5.fc17.i686 requires libedataserver-1.2.so.15 1:anerley-0.3.0-5.fc17.i6

Re: Problems with blank uncompletely burned rewritable CD's in F16

2011-11-07 Thread Kamil Paral
> Hi, > > I'm trying to blank *uncompletely burned* rewritable CD's with > brasero: > brasero waits until such a CD is inserted, but nothing happens if I > insert the CD (Brasero does not recognize resp. has no access to such > a > CD in the CD drive). > > I'm using nautilus as file manager insid

Re: pushes to stable during freeze - process question

2011-11-07 Thread Kamil Paral
> On Thu, 27 Oct 2011 07:59:12 -0400 (EDT) > Kamil Paral wrote: > > > Quick question, > > > > how do rel-eng guys know which updates are OK to push to stable > > during freeze and which are not? For example we have the final > > freeze > > now. Some packages like this: > > https://admin.fedorapr

Fedora 14 updates-testing report

2011-11-07 Thread updates
The following Fedora 14 Security updates need testing: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/moodle-1.9.14-1.fc14 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/hardlink-1.0-12.fc14 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/freetype-2.4.2-6.fc14 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xml

Fedora 15 updates-testing report

2011-11-07 Thread updates
The following Fedora 15 Security updates need testing: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/moodle-1.9.14-1.fc15 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/freetype-2.4.4-6.fc15 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/hardlink-1.0-12.fc15 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ope

Fedora 16 updates-testing report

2011-11-07 Thread updates
The following Fedora 16 Security updates need testing: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/moodle-2.0.5-1.fc16 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/hardlink-1.0-12.fc16 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/openswan-2.6.37-1.fc16 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php

[Test-Announce] 2011-11-07 @ ** 16:00 UTC ** - Fedora QA Meeting

2011-11-07 Thread Adam Williamson
UPDATE: As Kamil pointed out, I screwed up the time thing entirely in the initial announcement for this meeting. So here's a corrected version. We will adjust the meeting time for DST changes just as we did last year, starting this week. So the meeting is at 16:00 UTC, which means that if your cloc

Re: [Test-Announce] 2011-11-07 @ 15:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting

2011-11-07 Thread Adam Williamson
On Mon, 2011-11-07 at 03:25 -0500, Kamil Paral wrote: > > WHAT: Fedora QA Meeting > > WHEN: 15:00 UTC (12:00 EST, 09:00 PST) > > WHERE: #fedora-meeting > > > > It's meeting time again! It's the first meeting of the post-Fedora 16 > > era, so time to dust off anything you've been sitting on through

Re: [Test-Announce] 2011-11-07 @ 15:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting

2011-11-07 Thread Kamil Paral
> WHAT: Fedora QA Meeting > WHEN: 15:00 UTC (12:00 EST, 09:00 PST) > WHERE: #fedora-meeting > > It's meeting time again! It's the first meeting of the post-Fedora 16 > era, so time to dust off anything you've been sitting on through the > release crunch. Also note that clocks went back in North Am