On Fri, 2011-11-04 at 21:06 +0100, Henrik Nordström wrote:
> fre 2011-11-04 klockan 11:53 -0600 skrev Kevin Fenzi:
>
> > If we do this, next cycle we should NOT do any 'two part' go/no-go
> > meetings.
>
> The "two part" meetings were both about critical blockers that were
> known and actively b
>users can renumber user files by:
> (1) chown --from OLD_OWNER:OLD_GROUP NEW_OWNER:NEW_GROUP /
I think a --recursive option may be needed in the chown command.
There are thorns in these bushes. It is not only user and group ids in
new systems that must change: this change will upset permissi
The release notes say:
"Upgrades from earlier Fedora releases will keep their configuration,
starting user accounts from 500."
Might be worth noting that that only user accounts starting at 1000 with
be listed in the login screen,
even for updates. (Unless that has recently changed.)
Might be w
The following Fedora 16 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/moodle-2.0.5-1.fc16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/hardlink-1.0-12.fc16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/openswan-2.6.37-1.fc16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php
On Fri, 2011-11-04 at 14:54 -0700, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
> Here is the anaconda storage log from the successful install
> with the loader going to the 2 TB drive not the 3 TB.
I think the log from the fail case (no 2TB disk present) might be a bit
easier to use, if you could get that
The following Fedora 14 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/moodle-1.9.14-1.fc14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/hardlink-1.0-12.fc14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/freetype-2.4.2-6.fc14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xml
The following Fedora 15 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/moodle-1.9.14-1.fc15
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/freetype-2.4.4-6.fc15
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/hardlink-1.0-12.fc15
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ope
On 4 November 2011 13:06, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Fri, 04 Nov 2011 11:55:00 -0700
> Adam Williamson wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 2011-11-04 at 11:53 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>>
>> > > I am concerned with the process as executed not matching the
>> > > documentation. I'd just like to see a change codified
On Fri, 2011-11-04 at 11:28 -0700, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
> Here is the new disk layout. 7 partitions, 6 less than 2TB.
> Installer will not pass go (NEXT) unless it has a small disk
> to put the loader on.
>
> GPT fdisk (gdisk) version 0.7.2
>
> Partition table scan:
>MBR: prot
On Fri, 04 Nov 2011 11:55:00 -0700
Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-11-04 at 11:53 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> > > I am concerned with the process as executed not matching the
> > > documentation. I'd just like to see a change codified that either
> > > allows moving the Go / No-Go meetin
On Fri, 2011-11-04 at 11:53 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > I am concerned with the process as executed not matching the
> > documentation. I'd just like to see a change codified that either
> > allows moving the Go / No-Go meeting when appropriate or just
> > schedule it closer to the readiness mee
On Fri, 2011-11-04 at 09:37 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 23:17:21 -0700,
> Adam Williamson wrote:
> >
> > It'd be great if we can work with the anaconda team closely to try and
> > get involved all along the line in the UI rewrite stuff, and see if that
> > can reduce
On Fri, 2011-11-04 at 09:18 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 12:50:43 +0100,
> Patrick Lists wrote:
> > On 11/04/2011 07:32 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > So to summarize: we're testing more, to higher standards, on a release
> > > that had extremely disruptive changes,
Here is the new disk layout. 7 partitions, 6 less than 2TB.
Installer will not pass go (NEXT) unless it has a small disk
to put the loader on.
GPT fdisk (gdisk) version 0.7.2
Partition table scan:
MBR: protective
BSD: not present
APM: not present
GPT: present
Found valid GPT with pr
#245: proventester request
--+-
Reporter: davidstrauss | Owner: jdulaney
Type: proventester request | Status: closed
Priority: major| Milestone:
On Fri, 4 Nov 2011 09:37:33 -0500
Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 23:17:21 -0700,
> Adam Williamson wrote:
...snip...
>
> > Yeah, agreed. I don't think there's any especial need for the
> > go/no-go to be an entire day ahead of the release readiness
> > meeting, in all hone
Dne 4.11.2011 13:19, Matthew Savage napsal(a):
> I just joined the triagers group and I would like to know where I can
> help out.
Feel free to ping me on #fedora-bugzappers anytime (I am usually around
CET business hours and in the evening).
We also maintain (well, more or less maintain)
https
On 11/03/2011 11:59 PM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
> Still picking up the pieces...
>
> After moving some large file systems off the first 3TB drive
> I zeroed the partition table and started with a BIOS partition.
> After setting up the various partitions the installer insisted
> on putt
On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 11:21:08PM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 22:08:58 +,
> Andre Robatino wrote:
> > For weeks, I had around 50 uninstallable updates in Rawhide. A few days ago
> > that
> > jumped to over 100.
>
> Some of it is due to an evolution-data-server
On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 23:17:21 -0700,
Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> It'd be great if we can work with the anaconda team closely to try and
> get involved all along the line in the UI rewrite stuff, and see if that
> can reduce the pressure around release times - let's put that on the
> table for
On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 12:50:43 +0100,
Patrick Lists wrote:
> On 11/04/2011 07:32 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > So to summarize: we're testing more, to higher standards, on a release
> > that had extremely disruptive changes, with fewer paid RH staff involved
> > than before. It was a bit of a
Compose started at Fri Nov 4 08:15:08 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
4ti2-1.3.2-7.fc17.1.x86_64 requires libgmp.so.3()(64bit)
1:anerley-0.3.0-5.fc17.i686 requires libedataserver-1.2.so.15
1:anerley-0.3.0-5.fc17.i6
Hi Guys,
I just joined the triagers group and I would like to know where I can help
out.
My name is Matt Savage and I live in Massachusetts. I have experience
using Ubuntu and Fedora for the last 3 years or so. I am a software
engineer that works on the mainframe. I work mostly with DB2, Cobol
On 11/04/2011 07:32 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> So to summarize: we're testing more, to higher standards, on a release
> that had extremely disruptive changes, with fewer paid RH staff involved
> than before. It was a bit of a perfect storm!
And the result is something you can all be proud of! Th
Hi,
I'm trying to blank *uncompletely burned* rewritable CD's with brasero:
brasero waits until such a CD is inserted, but nothing happens if I
insert the CD (Brasero does not recognize resp. has no access to such a
CD in the CD drive).
I'm using nautilus as file manager inside gnome-shell, and i
Still picking up the pieces...
After moving some large file systems off the first 3TB drive
I zeroed the partition table and started with a BIOS partition.
After setting up the various partitions the installer insisted
on putting the boot on the one 2TB drive I have in the system.
I then disconne
26 matches
Mail list logo
